> -Message d'origine-
> De : Felix Fietkau [mailto:n...@nbd.name]
> Envoyé : jeudi 15 février 2018 15:46
> À : Jean Pierre TOSONI; Kalle Valo
> Cc : linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; ath9k-de...@qca.qualcomm.com
> Objet : Re: [PATCH v2] ath9k: mark RSSI as invalid if
On 2018-02-14 17:26, Jean Pierre TOSONI wrote:
> ath9k returns a wrong RSSI value for frames received in a 30ms time
> window after a channel change. The correct value is typically 10dB
> below the returned value.
>
> This was found with a Atheros AR9300 Rev:3 chip (WLE350NX / JWX6083
> cards), du
less@vger.kernel.org; ath9k-
> > de...@qca.qualcomm.com
> > Objet : Re: [PATCH v2] ath9k: mark RSSI as invalid if frame received
> > during channel setup
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 07:51:28AM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
> > > James Cameron writes:
> >
> -Message d'origine-
> De : qu...@laptop.org [mailto:qu...@laptop.org]
> Envoyé : jeudi 15 février 2018 08:21
> À : Kalle Valo
> Cc : Jean Pierre TOSONI; linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; ath9k-
> de...@qca.qualcomm.com
> Objet : Re: [PATCH v2] ath9k: mark RSSI as
m.com
> Objet : Re: [PATCH v2] ath9k: mark RSSI as invalid if frame received
> during channel setup
>
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 8:26 AM, Jean Pierre TOSONI
> wrote:
> > ath9k returns a wrong RSSI value for frames received in a 30ms
> time
> > window after a channel c
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 07:51:28AM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
> James Cameron writes:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 04:26:42PM +, Jean Pierre TOSONI wrote:
> >> ath9k returns a wrong RSSI value for frames received in a 30ms time
> >> window after a channel change. The correct value is typically
James Cameron writes:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 04:26:42PM +, Jean Pierre TOSONI wrote:
>> ath9k returns a wrong RSSI value for frames received in a 30ms time
>> window after a channel change. The correct value is typically 10dB
>> below the returned value.
>
> How was your correct value dete
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 04:26:42PM +, Jean Pierre TOSONI wrote:
> ath9k returns a wrong RSSI value for frames received in a 30ms time
> window after a channel change. The correct value is typically 10dB
> below the returned value.
How was your correct value determined?
> This was found with a
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 8:26 AM, Jean Pierre TOSONI wrote:
> ath9k returns a wrong RSSI value for frames received in a 30ms time
> window after a channel change. The correct value is typically 10dB
> below the returned value.
>
> This was found with a Atheros AR9300 Rev:3 chip (WLE350NX / JWX6083
