On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 10:10 +, Jean Pierre TOSONI wrote:
> >
> > However, it looks like you're right and ieee80211_bss_info_update()
> > doesn't take the flag into account. Bit strange that we even have
> > the flag I guess, since we treat 0 as an invalid value in various
> > places, being too
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Johannes Berg [mailto:johan...@sipsolutions.net]
> Envoyé : samedi 10 février 2018 22:09
> À : Jean Pierre TOSONI; linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
> Objet : Re: mac80211 scan results, signal value not reliable
>
> On Thu, 2018-02-08 a
On Thu, 2018-02-08 at 09:49 +, Jean Pierre TOSONI wrote:
> In net/mac80211/scan.c, function ieee80211_bss_info_update() passes
> incoming scan results to the generic wireless layer, with indication of
> the received signal level, but no indication of signal validity.
Well, there is an indicat
==--==--==--==
Hello list,
In net/mac80211/scan.c, function ieee80211_bss_info_update() passes
incoming scan results to the generic wireless layer, with indication of
the received signal level, but no indication of signal validity.
Before ie