Bruce, Yocto kernel folks:
Here is the next 5.2.x stable update "extension" primarily created for
the Yocto project, as the 14th v5.2.x post-EOL release.
The content is from an audit of what went into the v5.4.9 ---> v5.4.11
releases -- however note that v5.4.10 only contained a single commit.
T
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 2:43 AM Michal Simek wrote:
>
> On 19. 03. 20 23:39, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 12:29 PM wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Quanyang Wang
> >>
> >> When assigning value to a pointer as below:
> >>
> >> itapdly = (u32 [MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400 + 1]) {0x0, 0x
Hi Bruce,
On 3/20/20 6:39 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 12:29 PM wrote:
From: Quanyang Wang
When assigning value to a pointer as below:
itapdly = (u32 [MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400 + 1]) {0x0, 0x15, 0x15...0x0};
then using gcc 9.2.0 to compile, in some condition the po
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 4:36 AM Xu, Yanfei wrote:
>
>
> On 3/20/20 6:48 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 11:44 PM wrote:
> >> From: Yanfei Xu
> >>
> >> Before the last commit, it updated the power-domain cells to 2.
> >> However, the last commit added some codes without righ
From: Yanfei Xu
drop TI_DAVINCI_CPDMA option removed from v5.2 kernel
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/99f629718272974405e8d180d2fa70c03c06d61f
drop SND_DAVINCI_SOC_MCASP option removed from v5.0 kernel
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/f2055e145f2975a75dace8e386fad9364828cdb4
dr
On 3/20/20 6:48 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 11:44 PM wrote:
From: Yanfei Xu
Before the last commit, it updated the power-domain cells to 2.
However, the last commit added some codes without right power-domain
cells.
So, update OSPI power domain cells to 2 here to avoid
From: Quanyang Wang
Because of upstream commit b35b9a10362d ("mtd: spi-nor: Move m25p80 code
in spi-nor.c"), CONFIG_MTD_M25P80 is not used anymore.
Signed-off-by: Quanyang Wang
---
bsp/marvell-cn96xx/marvell-cn96xx.cfg | 1 -
bsp/nxp-ls20xx/nxp-ls20xx.cfg | 1 -
bsp/xilinx-zynq/xilinx-
On 19. 03. 20 23:39, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 12:29 PM wrote:
>>
>> From: Quanyang Wang
>>
>> When assigning value to a pointer as below:
>>
>> itapdly = (u32 [MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400 + 1]) {0x0, 0x15, 0x15...0x0};
>>
>> then using gcc 9.2.0 to compile, in some conditi
