Re: [linux-yocto][yocto-kernel-cache][master yocto-5.4][PATCH] arm64/perf: fix backtrace for AAPCS with FP enabled

2020-05-05 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 10:43 PM Xu, Yanfei wrote: > > No, you didn't miss any things. I just know that the patches are > generated from your scripts. And I will resend the patch against > linux-yocto. > ok! Thanks for the follow up. It is ok to send things this way if required .. I just was

Re: [linux-yocto][yocto-kernel-cache][master yocto-5.4][PATCH] arm64/perf: fix backtrace for AAPCS with FP enabled

2020-05-05 Thread Xu, Yanfei
No, you didn't miss any things. I just know that the patches are generated from your scripts. And I will resend the patch against linux-yocto. Yanfei On 5/2/20 11:19 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: Did I miss applying this to the kernel-cache previously ? or did I miss a patch against the

Re: [linux-yocto][yocto-kernel-cache][master yocto-5.4][PATCH] arm64/perf: fix backtrace for AAPCS with FP enabled

2020-05-02 Thread Bruce Ashfield
Did I miss applying this to the kernel-cache previously ? or did I miss a patch against the linux-yocto repo itself ? The reason I ask, is that it is awkward to apply patches like this to the tree. If you send the patch against linux-yocto, I'll apply it and then commit the change to the