Bruce Ashfield escreveu no dia quinta,
29/09/2022 à(s) 18:09:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 12:55 PM Jose Quaresma
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Bruce,
>>
>> Bruce Ashfield escreveu no dia quinta,
>> 29/09/2022 à(s) 17:42:
>>
>>> If this broke another use case, send the details and I'll debug it here.
>>> But
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 12:55 PM Jose Quaresma
wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> Bruce Ashfield escreveu no dia quinta,
> 29/09/2022 à(s) 17:42:
>
>> If this broke another use case, send the details and I'll debug it here.
>> But these changes are required for some configurations, so I'm not going to
>>
Hi Bruce,
Bruce Ashfield escreveu no dia quinta,
29/09/2022 à(s) 17:42:
> If this broke another use case, send the details and I'll debug it here.
> But these changes are required for some configurations, so I'm not going to
> simply revert.
>
I've been trying to figure out why this is
If this broke another use case, send the details and I'll debug it here.
But these changes are required for some configurations, so I'm not going to
simply revert.
Bruce
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 12:37 PM Jose Quaresma
wrote:
> This reverts commit 9320c2a1aaa085e94abd15ede0d93ffdab578e9d.
>
>
This reverts commit 9320c2a1aaa085e94abd15ede0d93ffdab578e9d.
The strip_common_prefix function is changed in a way that they will
use the expanded path of the input argument.
There are some changes in the process_file function for the *.cfg files
only and not none for *.scc, *.patch and
