On 2016-06-01 9:27 PM, Yong Li wrote:
Thanks Nishanth!
Hi Bruce, based on the discussion, please merge the
5d1a2961adf906f965b00eb8059fd2e0585e0e09 from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap.git.
While that is a better upstream reference, the patch didn't cherry
pick
Thanks Nishanth!
Hi Bruce, based on the discussion, please merge the
5d1a2961adf906f965b00eb8059fd2e0585e0e09 from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap.git.
Regarding I2C1 support, let me try to find/submit another patch.
Thanks,
Yong
2016-06-02 3:22 GMT+08:00 Bruce A
On 2016-06-01 5:03 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On 06/01/2016 12:50 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On 06/01/2016 12:24 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 2016-06-01 1:21 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On 06/01/2016 11:57 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 2016-06-01 12:56 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On 06/01/2016 11:50 AM, Bruce
On 06/01/2016 12:50 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> On 06/01/2016 12:24 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>> On 2016-06-01 1:21 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
>>> On 06/01/2016 11:57 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 2016-06-01 12:56 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> On 06/01/2016 11:50 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>> On 201
On 2016-06-01 02:33 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 06/01/2016 01:29 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 2016-05-31 10:43 PM, Li, Yong B wrote:
Thanks Nishanth for your information. I find the 5d1a2961adf9 commit in
linux-omap. It seems to me that it only enables the I2C2 bus. Is it correct? We
want to
On 2016-06-01 1:57 PM, Zhang, Jianxun wrote:
On 5/30/16, 11:03 AM, "Bruce Ashfield" wrote:
On 2016-05-27 07:51 PM, Jianxun Zhang wrote:
Sync up with 32 bit common-pc variant to bring EFI
framebuffer driver into 64 bit PC config.
[YOCTO #9653]
Signed-off-by: Jianxun Zhang
---
This patch i
On 2016-05-31 10:43 PM, Li, Yong B wrote:
Thanks Nishanth for your information. I find the 5d1a2961adf9 commit in
linux-omap. It seems to me that it only enables the I2C2 bus. Is it correct? We
want to enable both the I2C1 and I2C2 buses for external i2c devices.
As long as it works for what
On 06/01/2016 12:24 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 2016-06-01 1:21 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
>> On 06/01/2016 11:57 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>> On 2016-06-01 12:56 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On 06/01/2016 11:50 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 2016-06-01 11:36 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
>> On Tue,
On 2016-06-01 1:21 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On 06/01/2016 11:57 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 2016-06-01 12:56 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On 06/01/2016 11:50 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 2016-06-01 11:36 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 23:31 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 2016-05-31 6:
On 06/01/2016 11:57 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 2016-06-01 12:56 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
>> On 06/01/2016 11:50 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>> On 2016-06-01 11:36 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 23:31 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>
> On 2016-05-31 6:24 PM, Ranostay, Matt wr
Nope that seems sane to me.
Thanks,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 8:31 PM
To: Ranostay, Matt
Cc: linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [PULL REQUEST] add standard/bxt-rebase branch
On 2016-05-31 6:24
On 2016-06-01 12:56 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On 06/01/2016 11:50 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 2016-06-01 11:36 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 23:31 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 2016-05-31 6:24 PM, Ranostay, Matt wrote:
This pull request is for adding the standard/bxt-rebase br
On 06/01/2016 11:50 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 2016-06-01 11:36 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
>> On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 23:31 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2016-05-31 6:24 PM, Ranostay, Matt wrote:
This pull request is for adding the standard/bxt-rebase branch with
has vario
On 2016-06-01 11:36 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 23:31 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 2016-05-31 6:24 PM, Ranostay, Matt wrote:
This pull request is for adding the standard/bxt-rebase branch with
has various backports from 4.6 and 4.5, which are have an
unacceptable risk of br
On 2016-06-01 11:12 AM, Daniel Dragomir wrote:
Hello Bruce!
This series of patches brings improvements for FEMAC and AXXIA drivers
and add a new Device Tree for a new development board named Victoria.
NOTE: All the following patches are for both axxia branches:
standard/axxia/base and standard/
On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 23:31 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>
> On 2016-05-31 6:24 PM, Ranostay, Matt wrote:
> >
> >
> > This pull request is for adding the standard/bxt-rebase branch with
> > has various backports from 4.6 and 4.5, which are have an
> > unacceptable risk of breaking other platform
Hello Bruce!
This series of patches brings improvements for FEMAC and AXXIA drivers
and add a new Device Tree for a new development board named Victoria.
NOTE: All the following patches are for both axxia branches:
standard/axxia/base and standard/preempt-rt/axxia/base,
Axxia internal tag: 1.2
From: John Jacques
Signed-off-by: John Jacques
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/Makefile | 1 +
arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/axm5616-victoria.dts | 122 +
2 files changed, 123 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/axm5616-victoria.dts
diff
From: John Jacques
The driver was calling free_irq() without first calling
disable_irq() to synchronize pending and active handlers.
This commit adds a call to disable_irq().
A previous version of this commit got removed when
b53c950 was applied.
Signed-off-by: John Jacques
---
drivers/net/et
From: John Jacques
Signed-off-by: John Jacques
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-axxia.c | 9 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-axxia.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-axxia.c
index 6c84826..598cc4e 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-axxia.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/bus
From: John Jacques
Signed-off-by: John Jacques
---
drivers/edac/axxia_edac.c | 461 --
1 file changed, 461 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 drivers/edac/axxia_edac.c
diff --git a/drivers/edac/axxia_edac.c b/drivers/edac/axxia_edac.c
deleted file mode
21 matches
Mail list logo
