[linux-yocto] [PATCH 1/2] driver: of: configfs: fix a building warning

2018-04-18 Thread Meng.Li
From: Limeng Build kernel for arm64 platform, there is a warning as below: drivers/of/configfs.c:153:34: note: format string is defined here pr_debug("%s: buf=%p max_count=%u\n", __func__, ~^ %lu This building warning is introduc

[linux-yocto] [v2]: : [yocto-4.12]: intel-socfpga: update patches for Stratix10 platform

2018-04-18 Thread Meng.Li
From: Limeng Hi Bruce, Now, there are 2 below patches to update intel-socfpga, Stratix10 SoC platform. 0001-driver-of-configfs-fix-a-building-warning.patch 0002-driver-misc-intel-service-schedule-thread-out-when-t.patch Please help to meger the 2 patches into linux-yocto, kernel 4.12, branch i

[linux-yocto] [PATCH 2/2] driver: misc: intel-service: schedule thread out when there is no data reveived

2018-04-18 Thread Meng.Li
From: MengLi In thread svc_normal_to_secure_thread(), function kfifo_out_spinlocked() always return, so this thread can't release cpu even if there is no data received, and cause cpu is under heave load status. System performance is poor. This issue is introduced by commit 89d66bb89508("driver,

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 1/2] driver: of: configfs: fix a building warning

2018-04-18 Thread Li, Meng
> -Original Message- > From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2018 5:01 AM > To: Li, Meng > Cc: linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] driver: of: configfs: fix a building warning > > On 2018-04-18 10:17 AM, meng...@windriv

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 1/2] driver: of: configfs: fix a building warning

2018-04-18 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2018-04-18 10:17 AM, meng...@windriver.com wrote: From: Limeng Build kernel for arm64 platform, there is a waring as below: w/waring/warning/ drivers/of/configfs.c:153:34: note: format string is defined here pr_debug("%s: buf=%p max_count=%u\n", __func__,

Re: [linux-yocto] [PULL REQUEST v4] Intel Axxia updates to linux-yocto-4.12

2018-04-18 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2018-04-18 12:06 PM, Daniel Dragomir wrote: Hello Bruce! I made the rebase on top of 4.12.22 tag. You can pull the patches from https://github.com/axxia/axxia_yocto_linux_4.12_pull.git merged! Bruce Pull standard/axxia/base-1.1v4 -> standard/axxia/base standard/preempt-rt/axxia/base-1.

[linux-yocto] [PULL REQUEST v4] Intel Axxia updates to linux-yocto-4.12

2018-04-18 Thread Daniel Dragomir
Hello Bruce! I made the rebase on top of 4.12.22 tag. You can pull the patches from https://github.com/axxia/axxia_yocto_linux_4.12_pull.git Pull standard/axxia/base-1.1v4 -> standard/axxia/base standard/preempt-rt/axxia/base-1.1v4 -> standard/preempt-rt/axxia/base If you add more patches to st

[linux-yocto] [PATCH 1/2] driver: of: configfs: fix a building warning

2018-04-18 Thread Meng.Li
From: Limeng Build kernel for arm64 platform, there is a waring as below: drivers/of/configfs.c:153:34: note: format string is defined here pr_debug("%s: buf=%p max_count=%u\n", __func__, ~^ %lu Because on arm64 platform, size_t

[linux-yocto] [PATCH 2/2] driver: misc: intel-service: schedule thread out when there is no data reveived

2018-04-18 Thread Meng.Li
From: MengLi In thread svc_normal_to_secure_thread(), function kfifo_out_spinlocked() always return, so this thread can't release cpu even if there is no data received, and cause cpu is under heave load status. System performance is poor. Therefore, schedule this thread out when there is no data

[linux-yocto] : [yocto-4.12]: intel-socfpga: update patches for Stratix10 platform

2018-04-18 Thread Meng.Li
From: Limeng Hi Bruce, Now, there are 2 below patches to update intel-socfpga, Stratix10 SoC platform. 0001-driver-of-configfs-fix-a-building-warning.patch 0002-driver-misc-intel-service-schedule-thread-out-when-t.patch Please help to meger the 2 patches into linux-yocto, kernel 4.12, branch i

Re: [linux-yocto] [PULL REQUEST v3] Intel Axxia updates to linux-yocto-4.12

2018-04-18 Thread Daniel Dragomir
On 17.04.2018 20:56, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 04/12/2018 12:29 PM, Daniel Dragomir wrote: Hello Bruce! I made the changes you asked and I ran regression testings on 3 INTEL boards (arm64: cortexa57 and cortexa53; arm: cortexa15). I attached to the mailing list only the patches I made change