On 09/10/2014 10:06 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 14-09-10 03:17 AM, He Zhe wrote:
On 09/10/2014 02:41 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 14-09-09 10:56 PM, zhe...@windriver.com wrote:
From: He Zhe
Revert unnecessary renaming for BPF. Build will fail if related
drivers are
enabled but do not get
On 14-09-10 03:17 AM, He Zhe wrote:
On 09/10/2014 02:41 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 14-09-09 10:56 PM, zhe...@windriver.com wrote:
From: He Zhe
Revert unnecessary renaming for BPF. Build will fail if related
drivers are
enabled but do not get updated accordingly.
Did you actually perform
On 09/10/2014 02:41 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 14-09-09 10:56 PM, zhe...@windriver.com wrote:
From: He Zhe
Revert unnecessary renaming for BPF. Build will fail if related
drivers are
enabled but do not get updated accordingly.
Did you actually perform a git revert on this commit on linu
On 14-09-09 10:56 PM, zhe...@windriver.com wrote:
From: He Zhe
Revert unnecessary renaming for BPF. Build will fail if related drivers are
enabled but do not get updated accordingly.
Did you actually perform a git revert on this commit on linux-yocto-3.14
standard/base branch ?
This didn't r
From: He Zhe
Revert unnecessary renaming for BPF. Build will fail if related drivers are
enabled but do not get updated accordingly.
Signed-off-by: He Zhe
---
arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c | 4 ++--
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 4 ++--
arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c| 8
ar
