On 3/19/19 11:42 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 8:06 AM He Zhe wrote:
>> This is for
>> v4.19/standard/preempt-rt/base
>> v4.19/standard/preempt-rt/intel
>> v4.19/standard/preempt-rt/intel-x86
> Is this also part of an -rt stable/dev update ? It should be, but I
> didn't ha
On 3/19/19 11:42 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 8:06 AM He Zhe wrote:
>> This is for
>> v4.19/standard/preempt-rt/base
>> v4.19/standard/preempt-rt/intel
>> v4.19/standard/preempt-rt/intel-x86
> Is this also part of an -rt stable/dev update ? It should be, but I
> didn't ha
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 8:06 AM He Zhe wrote:
>
> This is for
> v4.19/standard/preempt-rt/base
> v4.19/standard/preempt-rt/intel
> v4.19/standard/preempt-rt/intel-x86
Is this also part of an -rt stable/dev update ? It should be, but I
didn't have time to look today.
The reason I ask, is that I s
On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 10:09 PM Pradhan, Surya NarayanX
wrote:
>
> Hi Bruce,
>
> Please merge it in 4.19,5.0 & master branch.
Thanks for the info.
This has now been merged.
Bruce
>
> Thanks & regards
> Surya
>
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org
> [mailt
This is for
v4.19/standard/preempt-rt/base
v4.19/standard/preempt-rt/intel
v4.19/standard/preempt-rt/intel-x86
Zhe
On 3/18/19 8:04 PM, zhe...@windriver.com wrote:
> From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
>
> The lazy-preempt uses the wrong return label in case preemption isn't
> possible. This results
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
The lazy-preempt uses the wrong return label in case preemption isn't
possible. This results crash while returning to the kernel.
Use the correct return label if preemption isn' possible.
Reported-by: Andri Yngvason
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
com
