Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH v5.2 rt] mmc: cavium-thunderx: Drop the IRQF_NO_THREAD constraint

2019-10-13 Thread Bruce Ashfield
In message: [PATCH v5.2 rt] mmc: cavium-thunderx: Drop the IRQF_NO_THREAD constraint on 10/10/2019 Kevin Hao wrote: > The IRQF_NO_THREAD is added by a Marvell SDK patch 238e623e1024 ("mmc: > cavium: fix swiotlb buffer is full") in order to get back some of the > performance loss. But in some

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH v5.2] tracing/arm64: Have max stack tracer handle the case of return address after data

2019-10-13 Thread Bruce Ashfield
merged Bruce In message: [PATCH v5.2] tracing/arm64: Have max stack tracer handle the case of return address after data on 10/10/2019 Kevin Hao wrote: > From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" > > commit f7edb451fa51e44e62177347ea7850aa0e901ea5 upstream > > Most archs (well at least x86) store the

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH v5.2] arm64: Remove unneeded rcu_read_lock from debug handlers

2019-10-13 Thread Bruce Ashfield
merged. Bruce In message: [PATCH v5.2] arm64: Remove unneeded rcu_read_lock from debug handlers on 09/10/2019 Kevin Hao wrote: > From: Masami Hiramatsu > > commit 760d8ed069c4e32a92e2ba251a3b0d9a87a3e771 upstream > > Remove rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() from debug exception > handlers

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH v5.2] arm64: Remove unneeded rcu_read_lock from debug handlers

2019-10-13 Thread Bruce Ashfield
merged. Bruce In message: [PATCH v5.2] arm64: Remove unneeded rcu_read_lock from debug handlers on 09/10/2019 Kevin Hao wrote: > From: Masami Hiramatsu > > commit 760d8ed069c4e32a92e2ba251a3b0d9a87a3e771 upstream > > Remove rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() from debug exception > handlers

Re: [linux-yocto] [linux-yocto v5.2][PATCH 0/3] iwlwifi/mvm related patches from mainline kernel

2019-10-09 Thread Bruce Ashfield
In message: [linux-yocto][linux-yocto v5.2][PATCH 0/3] iwlwifi/mvm related patches from mainline kernel on 09/10/2019 Yongxin Liu wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > Those three patches are from mainline kernel without any change. > They exist since v5.3-rc4. Please help to backport to linux-yocto v5.2. >

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel v5.2/standard/xlnx-soc][PATCH 2/2] arm: dts: zynq: update coresight device node

2019-10-09 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 9:39 AM Michal Simek wrote: > > Hi, > > On 09. 10. 19 4:38, quanyang.w...@windriver.com wrote: > > From: Quanyang Wang > > > > Using new compatible value for funnel and replicator device nodes, > > and use correct unit-address. > > > > Signed-off-by: Quanyang Wang > > ---

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel v5.2/standard/xlnx-soc][PATCH 0/2] patches for zynq

2019-10-09 Thread Bruce Ashfield
In message: [linux-yocto][kernel v5.2/standard/xlnx-soc][PATCH 0/2] patches for zynq on 09/10/2019 quanyang.w...@windriver.com wrote: > From: Quanyang Wang > > Hi Bruce, Michal, > > There are 2 patches. One is fixing compile warning which is triggered by > new version gcc 9.2.0. And the

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH][v5.2/standard/preempt-rt/base] printk: devkmsg: read: Return EPIPE when the first message user-space wants has gone

2019-10-02 Thread Bruce Ashfield
I didn't merge this directly, but instead updated the -rt branches to -rt9 .. so I got your change that way. Cheers, Bruce On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 5:36 AM wrote: > > From: He Zhe > > This fixes ltp failure, > kmsg01.c:444: FAIL: read returned: 56: SUCCESS > > When user-space wants to read the

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH] powerpc/603: Fix handling of the DIRTY flag

2019-09-24 Thread Bruce Ashfield
In message: [linux-yocto][PATCH] powerpc/603: Fix handling of the DIRTY flag on 24/09/2019 zhe...@windriver.com wrote: > From: Christophe Leroy > > commit 415480dce2ef03bb8335deebd2f402f475443ce0 upstream > > If a page is already mapped RW without the DIRTY flag, the DIRTY > flag is never

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel v5.2/standard/xlnx-soc][PATCH 0/3] patches for zynq7000

2019-09-24 Thread Bruce Ashfield
In message: [linux-yocto][kernel v5.2/standard/xlnx-soc][PATCH 0/3] patches for zynq7000 on 23/09/2019 quanyang.w...@windriver.com wrote: > From: Quanyang Wang > > Hi Bruce, > > Would you please help merge these patches to linux-yocto > v5.2/standard/xlnx-soc branch? These are now merged.

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH v5.2] cn96xx: Another patch series for the cn96xx SoC support

2019-09-24 Thread Bruce Ashfield
In message: [PATCH v5.2] cn96xx: Another patch series for the cn96xx SoC support on 23/09/2019 Kevin Hao wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > Here is another patch series got from Marvell for the cn96xx SoC support. > It mainly include some fixes for the mmc and Ethernet. Please help me > merge this into

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][PATCH 0/1] xilinx-zynq: enable coresight and xadc kernel options for xilinx-zynq bsp

2019-09-24 Thread Bruce Ashfield
In message: [linux-yocto][kernel-cache][PATCH 0/1] xilinx-zynq: enable coresight and xadc kernel options for xilinx-zynq bsp on 23/09/2019 quanyang.w...@windriver.com wrote: > From: Quanyang Wang > > Hi Bruce, > > Would you please help merge this patch to yocto-kernel-cache's branch >

Re: [linux-yocto] v4.18.x - stable updates comprising v4.18.45

2019-09-23 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 2:37 PM Paul Gortmaker wrote: > Bruce, Yocto kernel folks: > > Here is the *final* 4.18.x stable update "extension" primarily created > for the Yocto project, continuing from the previous v4.18.44 release. > > This final release closes out a run of 25 releases and about

Re: [linux-yocto] : [kernel v5.2/standard/bcm-2xxx-rpi]: bcm-2xxx-rpi: add patches for improving raspberrypi 4b platform

2019-09-19 Thread Bruce Ashfield
In message: [linux-yocto]: [kernel v5.2/standard/bcm-2xxx-rpi]: bcm-2xxx-rpi: add patches for improving raspberrypi 4b platform on 17/09/2019 meng...@windriver.com wrote: > From: Limeng > > Hi Bruce, > > I am working on BSP bcm-2xxx-rpi platform, and intend to merge this BSP > supporting

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 0/2 v5.2] Add the RT support for the cn96xx

2019-09-19 Thread Bruce Ashfield
In message: [PATCH 0/2 v5.2] Add the RT support for the cn96xx on 19/09/2019 Kevin Hao wrote: > From: Kevin Hao > > This patch series adds the RT support for the Marvell cn96xx SoC. It > includes the kernel and kernel cache patches. All the kernel patches > except the following have already

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel v5.2/standard/xlnx-soc][PATCH 0/2] fix compile warning

2019-09-19 Thread Bruce Ashfield
In message: [linux-yocto][kernel v5.2/standard/xlnx-soc][PATCH 0/2] fix compile warning on 19/09/2019 quanyang.w...@windriver.com wrote: > From: Quanyang Wang > > Hi Bruce, > > Would you please help me merge the two patches into > linux-ycoto-5.2 kernel, branch v5.2/standard/xlnx-soc ?

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH v5.2] mmc: cavium: Drop the aligned check for the dma address

2019-09-19 Thread Bruce Ashfield
In message: [PATCH v5.2] mmc: cavium: Drop the aligned check for the dma address on 19/09/2019 Kevin Hao wrote: > From: Kevin Hao > > In commit 73c1489f17e8 ("mmc: cavium: forbid unaligned DMA"), the codes > are added to check the unaligned dma request. But at that time, > we still don't do

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache master] ti-am335x: add CPU freq/idle support and correct arch bits

2019-09-19 Thread Bruce Ashfield
In message: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache master] ti-am335x: add CPU freq/idle support and correct arch bits on 16/09/2019 Jun Miao wrote: > > > Hi Bruce. >Please help me merge the two patches to master branch of yocto-kernel-cache merged to master. Bruce > >

Re: [linux-yocto] : [kernel-cache master/yocto-5.2]: bcm-2xxx-rpi: add configure file for bcm-2xxx-rpi BSP in kernel-cache

2019-09-19 Thread Bruce Ashfield
In message: [linux-yocto]: [kernel-cache master/yocto-5.2]: bcm-2xxx-rpi: add configure file for bcm-2xxx-rpi BSP in kernel-cache on 16/09/2019 meng...@windriver.com wrote: > From: Limeng > > Hi Bruce, > > I am working on BSP bcm-2xxx-rpi platform, and intend to merge this BSP > supporting

Re: [linux-yocto] v4.18.x - stable updates comprising v4.18.43

2019-09-14 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 5:06 PM Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > Bruce, Yocto kernel folks: > > Here is the next 4.18.x stable update "extension" primarily created > for the Yocto project, continuing from the previous v4.18.42 release. > > There are about 125 commits here, based on the commits that were

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][yocto-5.2] Add NUMA node number and enable NUMA balancing

2019-09-09 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 3:12 AM Yongxin Liu wrote: > > Hi Bruce, > > The follow two patches were merged to master branch of yocto-kernel-cache. > > 07aeebc4cefbfa4f56a640917355ada547586b60 bsp/intel-x86: Enable NUMA balancing > for intel-x86-64 > 09126d352f7092f8bfe0f79128d7d1aa3b262c53

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache yocto-5.2] nxp-ls20xx: add kernel-cache configuration files for BSP nxp-ls20xx

2019-09-05 Thread Bruce Ashfield
merged. Bruce In message: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache yocto-5.2] nxp-ls20xx: add kernel-cache configuration files for BSP nxp-ls20xx on 04/09/2019 Xulin Sun wrote: > This adds the cfg & scc files to support the LS2088A-RDB. > > Signed-off-by: Xulin Sun > --- >

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache v5.2] ti-am335x: add base support

2019-09-05 Thread Bruce Ashfield
In message: [linux-yocto][kernel-cache v5.2] ti-am335x: add base support on 04/09/2019 Jun Miao wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > I am working ti boards(AM335x evm/sk/BBB) with am335x soc. > >

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache yocto-5.2][PATCH 0/1] xilinx-zynq: add kernel-cache support for zc702 and zc706 boards

2019-09-05 Thread Bruce Ashfield
In message: [linux-yocto][kernel-cache yocto-5.2][PATCH 0/1] xilinx-zynq: add kernel-cache support for zc702 and zc706 boards on 05/09/2019 quanyang.w...@windriver.com wrote: > From: Quanyang Wang > > Hi Bruce, > > The patch as below includes scc and cfg files for xilinx zc702/zc706 boards. >

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH] spp: optimize strip_common_prefix function

2019-09-05 Thread Bruce Ashfield
I have this queued for testing now. Bruce On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 1:09 AM Zhaolong Zhang wrote: > > strip_common_prefix() is the hot path that executes on every input file. > This patch sorts and uniqs the $include_paths by length descreasingly. > And with the sorted $include_paths, the

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH] [for all x86 branches] x86/boot: Save fields explicitly, zero out everything else

2019-09-05 Thread Bruce Ashfield
Since this is destined for -stable, I'm not going to merge the individual patch. I'm holding nearly all 5.2 updates until the last introduction issues are fixed. By that time, I'll have the next round of -stable updates ready to go as well. Cheers, Bruce On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 6:02 AM wrote:

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache master/yocto-5.0][PATCH] intel-x86: add MGA G200 series VGA support

2019-09-03 Thread Bruce Ashfield
Indeed. I appear to have messed it up .. I had a lot of merges to do today, so I was sure to get something wrong. This is now really merged. Bruce On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 9:57 PM Liwei Song wrote: > > Hi Bruce, > > It seems that this patch was missed by master branch, so does 5.2 branch also >

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 1/2 linux-yocto-dev all branches] aufs: bugfix, opts: Fix missing break statement

2019-09-03 Thread Bruce Ashfield
merged to linux-yocto-dev Bruce On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 3:28 AM wrote: > > From: He Zhe > > commit 4a80018d718f6be2e862d0c70bb11cd6e6d1fae5 upstream > > Add missing break statement for case Opt_wsum in au_opt_simple. > > Signed-off-by: He Zhe > See-also: >

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 2/2 linux-yocto-dev all branches] aufs: opts: Fix missing fallthrough

2019-09-03 Thread Bruce Ashfield
merged to linux-yocto-dev. Bruce On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 3:28 AM wrote: > > From: He Zhe > > commit 8d7b6374d5af2c31ce9501d3502808e3c7a9ea68 upstream > > A compilation -Wimplicit-fallthrough warning was enabled by commit > a035d552a93b ("Makefile: Globally enable fall-through warning") > and

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache] [all branches] [PATCH] net_sched: Add FQ Controlled Delay packet scheduling algorithm

2019-09-03 Thread Bruce Ashfield
merged to 4.19/5.0/5.2 and master of the kernel-cache. SRCREV bumps will follow in the next few days. Bruce On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 3:00 AM wrote: > > From: He Zhe > > It has been widely used and selected by systemd as defalut scheduling > algorithm > since v217. >

Re: [linux-yocto] [linux-yocto-v5.2]: [kernel standard/base]: renesas-rcar: add some patches to improve features on renesas-rcar platform

2019-09-03 Thread Bruce Ashfield
These look fine to me. All four patches are on v5.2/standard/base Bruce On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 2:53 AM wrote: > > From: Limeng > > Hi Bruce, > > I am working on BSP renesas-rcar platform, and intend to merge this BSP > supporting into yocto community. > Below 4 patches are used to improve

Re: [linux-yocto] : [kernel-cache yocto-5.2]: renesas-rcar: add configure file for renesas BSP in kernel-cache

2019-09-03 Thread Bruce Ashfield
This is now in the 5.2 branch of the kernel-cache. Bruce On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 5:19 AM wrote: > > From: Limeng > > Hi Bruce, > > I am working on BSP renesas-rcar platform, and intend to merge this BSP > supporting into yocto community. > Below patch includes scc and cfg files for

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-meta] bsp: Add the support for the marvell-cn96xx BSP

2019-09-03 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 3:40 AM Kevin Hao wrote: > > This adds the cfg files to support the Marvell OCTEON TX2 > CN96XX multicore arm64 SoC. merged to yocto-5.2 of the kernel-cache. Bruce > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao > --- > bsp/marvell-cn96xx/marvell-cn96xx-standard.scc | 7 ++ >

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel] The kernel patches for the Marvell cn96xx support

2019-09-03 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 3:40 AM Kevin Hao wrote: > > The following changes since commit 35276d20c01a78ee3640a074446b0c15c486c5d0: > > selftests/bpf: structure test_{progs, maps, verifier} test runners > uniformly (2019-08-30 00:33:44 -0400) > > are available in the Git repository at: > >

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache master] bsp: Add the support for the marvell-cn96xx BSP

2019-09-03 Thread Bruce Ashfield
merged to master Bruce On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 7:32 AM Kevin Hao wrote: > > This adds the cfg files to support the Marvell OCTEON TX2 > CN96XX multicore arm64 SoC. > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao > --- > bsp/marvell-cn96xx/marvell-cn96xx-standard.scc | 7 ++ >

Re: [linux-yocto] [linux-yocto-dev] Add the support for the Marvell cn96xx SoC

2019-09-03 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 7:25 AM Kevin Hao wrote: > > Hi Bruce, > > This patch series adds the support for the Marvell cn96xx SoC. The OCTEON TX2 > cn96xx SoC is a scalable architecture that integrates high performance 64-bit > Armv8.2 processors, a cache-coherent interconnect, hardware

Re: [linux-yocto] [linux-yocto v5.2] Add the support for the Marvell cn96xx SoC

2019-09-03 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 3:39 AM Kevin Hao wrote: > > Hi Bruce, > > This patch series adds the kernel and kernel meta for the support of the > Marvell cn96xx SoC support. These patches are almost the same as what I > have sent for the linux-yocto-dev [1] [2]. The major difference between I assume

Re: [linux-yocto] [linux-yocto-dev] Add the support for the Marvell cn96xx SoC

2019-09-03 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 1:01 AM Kevin Hao wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 07:21:04PM +0800, Kevin Hao wrote: > > Hi Bruce, > > > > This patch series adds the support for the Marvell cn96xx SoC. The OCTEON > > TX2 > > cn96xx SoC is a scalable architecture that integrates high performance > >

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-meta v5.2 0/2] Fix the kernel_configcheck warnings for the v5.2 kernel

2019-08-29 Thread Bruce Ashfield
Thanks Kevin, I now have these merged and they'll be part of my next 5.2 recipe revision. Bruce On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 4:30 AM Kevin Hao wrote: > > These two patches fix the kernel_configcheck warnings when building the > v5.2 kernel. > > Kevin Hao (2): > fsl-mpc8315e-rdb/beaglebone:

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache master] nxp-ls20xx: add kernel-cache configuration files for BSP nxp-ls20xx

2019-08-29 Thread Bruce Ashfield
merged Bruce On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 3:08 AM Xulin Sun wrote: > > This adds the cfg & scc files to support the LS2088A-RDB. > > Signed-off-by: Xulin Sun > --- > bsp/nxp-ls20xx/nxp-ls20xx-standard.scc | 8 ++ > bsp/nxp-ls20xx/nxp-ls20xx.cfg | 162 + >

Re: [linux-yocto] [linux-yocto-dev]: [kernel standard/base]: renesas-rcar: add some patches to improve features on renesas-rcar platform

2019-08-29 Thread Bruce Ashfield
all three are now merged to linux-yocto-dev. Bruce On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 2:31 AM wrote: > > From: Limeng > > Hi Bruce, > > I am working on BSP renesas-rcar platform, and intend to merge this BSP > supporting into yocto community. > Below 3 patches are used to improve gpio, CAN BUS, audio

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH] renesas-rcar: enable PCM3168A-I2C codec drvier

2019-08-29 Thread Bruce Ashfield
merged to master. Bruce On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 4:59 AM wrote: > > From: Limeng > > On KingFisher board, there is PCM3168A codec chip, so enable > PCM3168A-I2C codec driver by setting configure > CONFIG_SND_SOC_PCM3168A_I2C > > Signed-off-by: Meng Li > --- > bsp/renesas-rcar/renesas-rcar.cfg

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH] aufs: for v5.3-rc3, update UAPI SPDX

2019-08-29 Thread Bruce Ashfield
merged Bruce On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 9:52 AM wrote: > > From: "J. R. Okajima" > > Simply follows the commit in mainline, > 622445541b75 2019-07-29 kbuild: detect missing "WITH > Linux-syscall-note" for uapi headers > > Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima > > Backport from

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH] module: Fix build failure due to cracked commit

2019-08-26 Thread Bruce Ashfield
oops. Sorry about that, I forgot to push the resolution I did earlier today for this. It should be in the tree now. Bruce On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 10:14 PM wrote: > > From: He Zhe > > This is the missing half of the following commit that is cracked during > merging, > which causes build

Re: [linux-yocto] [linux-yocto-dev] Merge tag 'v5.3-rc6' into standard/base

2019-08-26 Thread Bruce Ashfield
Hmm. That wasn't on purpose. My builds ran overnight, so I'll have a look and fix it up. Bruce > > -- > > commit b73b90b1d2cc6b4ba740e66479ab054482174f94 > Merge: ce4ec6f a55aa89 > Author: Bruce Ashfield &g

Re: [linux-yocto] : [kernel-cache master]: renesas-rcar: add configure file for renesas BSP in kernel-cache

2019-08-25 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 6:15 AM wrote: > > From: Limeng > > Hi Bruce, > > I am working on BSP renesas-rcar platform, and intend to merge this BSP > supporting into yocto community. > Below patch includes scc and cfg files for renesas-rcar platform. > > Could you please merge this patch into

Re: [linux-yocto] v4.18.x - stable updates comprising v4.18.42

2019-08-25 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 10:14 AM Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > Bruce, Yocto kernel folks: > > Here is the next 4.18.x stable update "extension" primarily created > for the Yocto project, continuing from the previous v4.18.41 release. > > There are about 150 commits here, based on the remaining

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH] modules: always page-align module section allocations

2019-08-18 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 12:01 PM wrote: > > > 在 2019年8月16日 23:29,Paul Gortmaker 写下: > > > > [[linux-yocto] [PATCH] modules: always page-align module section > > allocations] On 16/08/2019 (Fri 15:36) zhe...@windriver.com wrote: > > > > It helps maintainers if the version is embedded in the

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache master][PATCH 1/1] ti-am335x: enable kernel options for PMIC support

2019-08-18 Thread Bruce Ashfield
merged Bruce On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 5:29 AM Jun Miao wrote: > > add Power Management IC support. > TPS65910: am335x EVM/SK > TPS65217: am335x BBB > > Signed-off-by: Jun Miao > --- > bsp/ti-am335x/ti-am335x.cfg | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 0/4] More security fragments

2019-08-12 Thread Bruce Ashfield
I've merged these to the 4.19/5.0/5.2 and master branches. SRCREV updates will follow this week, once I get some more test cycles completed. Bruce On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 12:29 PM Armin Kuster wrote: > It is time to move the kernel fragments out of meta-security to cache. > It should make

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache] Question about profiling.scc

2019-08-07 Thread Bruce Ashfield
uce > >1 # for oprofile and powertop >2 CONFIG_PROFILING=y >3 CONFIG_OPROFILE=y >4 CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y >5 CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC=y > > Maybe split profiling.cfg and move them to their recipe is a good way. > > > --Hongzhi > > > >

Re: [linux-yocto] v4.18.x - stable updates comprising v4.18.41

2019-08-07 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 11:43 PM Paul Gortmaker wrote: > Bruce, Yocto kernel folks: > > Here is the next 4.18.x stable update "extension" primarily created > for the Yocto project, continuing from the previous v4.18.40 release. > > There are about 220 commits here, based on commits chosen from

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache master][PATCH][V2] ti-am335x: add the basic scc/cfg enablement

2019-08-07 Thread Bruce Ashfield
I've merged v2, and created the standard/ti-am335x in linux-yocto-dev. Bruce On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 3:54 AM Jun Miao wrote: > Add scc/cfg kernel fragment to build and boot EVM/SK and BeagleBone Black > boards all with am335x soc > > Signed-off-by: Jun Miao > --- >

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache master]: ti-am335x

2019-08-07 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:01 AM Jun Miao wrote: > > On 8/7/19 10:45 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 6:20 AM Jun Miao wrote: > > > >> Hi Bruce, > >> > >> I am working ti boards(AM335x evm/sk/BBB) with am335x soc. > &g

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][master][PATCH 1/2] bsp/intel-x86: Set CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT to 6

2019-08-07 Thread Bruce Ashfield
I'm not sure if the intel folks are using these fragments and object to the different behaviour, but they look ok to me. I've merged them for now, but will reconsider if they cause problems in other configs. Bruce On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 3:27 AM Yongxin Liu wrote: > This config specifies the

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH] nfsd: Move nfsd patch from nfsd-enable.scc to new created nfs.scc

2019-08-07 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 3:25 AM wrote: > From: He Zhe > > Remove nfsd patch from nfsd-enable.scc which can be included directly or by > other features, and thus cause re-application of the patch. > > Create nfs.scc to include both configuration and patches for potential > inclusion > for BSPs

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-tools][PATCH] Add SPDX license headers to source files

2019-08-06 Thread Bruce Ashfield
Looks fine to me. I'm traveling right now, so it will be a few days until I get this merged and can send SRCREV updates to oe-core. Bruce On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 3:06 PM William Bourque wrote: > Kconfiglib/* were under ISC license before they were imported > here from

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH] nfsd4: Fix kernel crash when reading proc file reply_cache_stats

2019-08-06 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 6:49 AM wrote: > From: He Zhe > > reply_cache_stats uses wrong parameter as seq file private structure and > thus causes the following kernel crash when users read > /proc/fs/nfsd/reply_cache_stats > > BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 01f9 > PGD

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 1/1] ti-am335x: add the basic scc/cfg enablement

2019-08-06 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 6:20 AM Jun Miao wrote: > Add scc/cfg kernel fragment to build and boot EVM/SK and BeagleBone Black > boards all with am335x soc > > Signed-off-by: Jun Miao > --- > bsp/ti-am335x/ti-am335x-standard.scc | 8 + > bsp/ti-am335x/ti-am335x.cfg | 242

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache master]: ti-am335x

2019-08-06 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 6:20 AM Jun Miao wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > I am working ti boards(AM335x evm/sk/BBB) with am335x soc. > > 1.This patch add scc/cfg to yocto-kernel-cache master branch. > #1 shouldn't be a problem. 2.Could you help me build a new branch "ti-am335x" in

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache] Question about profiling.scc

2019-08-06 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 11:44 PM Hongzhi, Song wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > I see profiling.scc is included by kernel-cache/bsp/*, such as > bsp/intel-x86 bsp/common-pc/ ... . > > > My question is that is it necessary to open profiling.cfg defaultly? > We left profiling as a per-BSP decision, since

Re: [linux-yocto] linux-yocto-dev falls back to v5.2

2019-08-01 Thread Bruce Ashfield
, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:12 AM Bruce Ashfield wrote: > See the email on the poky/oe-core list. I was having some issues with 5.3 > and the new libc-headers. So I wasn't able to send the PV bump patch for > linux-yocto. I've temporarily gone back to a building configuration, but I > expect th

Re: [linux-yocto] linux-yocto-dev falls back to v5.2

2019-07-30 Thread Bruce Ashfield
See the email on the poky/oe-core list. I was having some issues with 5.3 and the new libc-headers. So I wasn't able to send the PV bump patch for linux-yocto. I've temporarily gone back to a building configuration, but I expect that I'll have it back to 5.3 in the next day or so. Bruce On Tue,

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH] btrfs: Fix build error while LIBCRC32C is module

2019-07-25 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 9:43 PM He Zhe wrote: > > > On 7/25/19 9:04 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 9:03 AM Bruce Ashfield > wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 4:54 AM wrote: > >>> From: YueHaibing > >>> >

Re: [linux-yocto] [linux-yocto-dev standard/xlnx-soc][PATCH 0/1] correct the code position

2019-07-25 Thread Bruce Ashfield
It is now merged. Bruce On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:25 AM qwang2 wrote: > > Hi Bruce, > > Could this patch be merged to linux-yocto-dev now? > > Thanks, > > Quanyang > > On 2019/7/23 上午11:11, quanyang.w...@windriver.com wrote: > > From: Quanyang Wang > > > > Hi Bruce, > > > > Would you please

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH] btrfs: Fix build error while LIBCRC32C is module

2019-07-25 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 9:03 AM Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 4:54 AM wrote: > > > > From: YueHaibing > > > > If CONFIG_BTRFS_FS is y and CONFIG_LIBCRC32C is m, > > building fails: > > I've already fixed this by changing the configu

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH] btrfs: Fix build error while LIBCRC32C is module

2019-07-25 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 4:54 AM wrote: > > From: YueHaibing > > If CONFIG_BTRFS_FS is y and CONFIG_LIBCRC32C is m, > building fails: I've already fixed this by changing the configuration in the kernel-cache. I'll pick this up in linux-yocto-dev once it makes a -rc release. Bruce > >

Re: [linux-yocto] [linux-yocto-dev standard/xlnx-soc][PATCH 0/2] xilinx-zynqmp: fix 2 issues in zcu102 Rev1.0 board

2019-07-23 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 9:20 AM Yunguo Wei wrote: > > > > 在 2019/7/23 21:03, qwang2 写道: > > > > On 7/23/19 8:41 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 1:29 AM qwang2 > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> On 7/22/19 11:34 PM, B

Re: [linux-yocto] [linux-yocto-dev standard/xlnx-soc][PATCH 0/2] xilinx-zynqmp: fix 2 issues in zcu102 Rev1.0 board

2019-07-23 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 1:29 AM qwang2 wrote: > > > On 7/22/19 11:34 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 1:24 AM wrote: > >> From: Quanyang Wang > >> > >> Hi Bruce, > >> > >> Would you please help merge these

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache master][PATCH 0/1] xilinx-zynqmp: update xilinx-zynqmp to support SDK xlnx_rebase_v4.19

2019-07-22 Thread Bruce Ashfield
merged to master and yocto-5.2 branches. Bruce On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 7:35 AM wrote: > > From: Quanyang Wang > > Hi Bruce, > > Would you please help to merge this patch to yocto-kernel-cache master? > > --LOG > Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x00 [0x410fd034] >

Re: [linux-yocto] [linux-yocto-dev standard/xlnx-soc][PATCH 0/2] xilinx-zynqmp: fix 2 issues in zcu102 Rev1.0 board

2019-07-22 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 1:24 AM wrote: > > From: Quanyang Wang > > Hi Bruce, > > Would you please help merge these 2 patches to linux-yocto-dev > standard/xlnx-soc branch? I've merged the patches. Also note: I'm about to move linux-yocto-dev to v5.3-rc1, so I've created a set of v5.2 branches

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 0/3] Enable more kernel configs

2019-07-19 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 3:01 AM Anuj Mittal wrote: > > Hi Bruce, > > Could you merge in 4.19, 5.0 and master if these look okay? Thank you. > They look fine to me, and are now on those three branches. Bruce > Anuj Mittal (3): > security.cfg: unset HARDENED_USERCOPY_FALLBACK > features: add

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 0000/1228] xilinx-zynqmp: add sdk patches

2019-07-19 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 9:36 AM Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 8:30 AM Michal Simek wrote: > > > > On 16. 07. 19 21:44, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 2:19 AM Wei, Yunguo > > > wrote: > > >> > &g

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 0000/1228] xilinx-zynqmp: add sdk patches

2019-07-18 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 8:30 AM Michal Simek wrote: > > On 16. 07. 19 21:44, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 2:19 AM Wei, Yunguo > > wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 7/8/2019 9:14 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > >>> On Thu,

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][master and yocto-5.0][PATCH] features/intel-persistent-memory: add pmem support for intel-x86-64

2019-07-18 Thread Bruce Ashfield
I was doing some cleanup before the push. Sorry for the delay, but it is now really merged. Bruce > > Thanks, > Yongxin > > > -Original Message- > > From: Liu, Yongxin > > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 18:49 > > To: 'Bruce Ashfield' > >

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][master and yocto-5.0][PATCH] features/intel-persistent-memory: add pmem support for intel-x86-64

2019-07-09 Thread Bruce Ashfield
merged Bruce On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 3:51 AM Yongxin Liu wrote: > > Because CONFIG_DEV_DAX* are not supported in preempt-rt kernel, use > two scc files for Non-RT kerel and RT kernel separately. > > Signed-off-by: Yongxin Liu > --- > .../intel-persistent-memory/intel-x86-64-dax.cfg | 7

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache master/yocto-5.0][PATCH] intel-x86: add MGA G200 series VGA support

2019-07-09 Thread Bruce Ashfield
merged Bruce On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 4:24 AM Liwei Song wrote: > > Enable CONFIG_DRM_MGAG200=m to support Matrox Electronics MGA G200 > and include it in intel-x86 bsp. > > Signed-off-by: Liwei Song > --- > bsp/intel-x86/intel-x86.scc | 1 + > features/mgag200/mgag200.cfg | 1 + >

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][PATCH] feature/net: Create a config variant of net.scc to for features

2019-07-05 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 10:54 AM wrote: > > From: He Zhe > > Since b5776165c9d3 ("netfilter: Fix remainder of pseudo-header protocol 0"), > net.scc includes a patch which would be reapplied when included by other > features. > > This patches create a config variant net-enable.scc for features and

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][yocto-4.19][PATCH 0/1] include core scsi support

2019-07-04 Thread Bruce Ashfield
t; > git://github.com/justanotherboy/yocto-kernel-cache yocto-4.19-scsi > https://github.com/justanotherboy/yocto-kernel-cache/tree/yocto-4.19-scsi > > Bruce Ashfield (1): > scsi-debug: include core scsi support for standalone inclusion > > features/s

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][PATCH 1/2] Revert "netfilter: Fix remainder of pseudo-header protocol 0"

2019-07-02 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 12:17 PM He Zhe wrote: > > > > On 7/2/19 9:16 PM, He Zhe wrote: > > > > On 7/2/19 9:04 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 4:54 AM wrote: > >>> From: He Zhe > >>> > >>> The pa

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][PATCH 1/2] Revert "netfilter: Fix remainder of pseudo-header protocol 0"

2019-07-02 Thread Bruce Ashfield
mistakenly > -treated as TCP/UDP. > - > -This patch corrects the conditions in nf_ip_checksum and all other places > that > -still call it with protocol 0. > - > -Fixes: 7fc38225363d ("netfilter: reject: skip csum verification for > protocols that don't support it") &

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH v2] features/security: Add more kernel hardening fragments

2019-06-27 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 11:02 PM wrote: > > From: He Zhe > > Signed-off-by: He Zhe > --- > v2: Add a note for people using uvesafb or other similar things. > merged. Bruce > features/security/security.cfg | 18 ++ > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) > > diff --git

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH] netfilter: Fix remainder of pseudo-header protocol 0

2019-06-27 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 11:03 PM He Zhe wrote: > > > > On 6/26/19 11:00 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 6:15 AM wrote: > >> From: He Zhe > >> > >> Since v5.1-rc1, some types of packets do not get unreachable reply with the

Re: [linux-yocto] failed to boot qemu with security.scc

2019-06-26 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:55 PM He Zhe wrote: > > > > On 6/26/19 10:49 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:25 AM He Zhe wrote: > >> Hi Bruce, > >> > >> Have you ever met the following error with features/security/security.sc

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH] netfilter: Fix remainder of pseudo-header protocol 0

2019-06-25 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 11:00 PM Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 6:15 AM wrote: > > > > From: He Zhe > > > > Since v5.1-rc1, some types of packets do not get unreachable reply with the > > following iptables setting. Fox example, > >

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH] netfilter: Fix remainder of pseudo-header protocol 0

2019-06-25 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 6:15 AM wrote: > > From: He Zhe > > Since v5.1-rc1, some types of packets do not get unreachable reply with the > following iptables setting. Fox example, So what's the upstream status of this ? (I haven't checked netdev yet). Bruce > > $ iptables -A INPUT -p icmp

Re: [linux-yocto] failed to boot qemu with security.scc

2019-06-25 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:25 AM He Zhe wrote: > > Hi Bruce, > > Have you ever met the following error with features/security/security.scc, > when running qemux86? Hmm. No, I haven't seen that. My old builds were using sysvinit, so I didn't have a recent build ready to go. But I just started a

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][PATCHv2 0/1] qemu support for ARM devices

2019-06-24 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 11:45 AM Adrian Freihofer wrote: > > Hi, Bruce, > > Compared to v1, this is more or less a rewrite. It is now very similar to the > qemuarma15 BSP as suggested by you. > > The qemuarm15 BSP generates a kernel of 7046128 bytes. > The current Beaglebone yocto configuration

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][PATCHv2 0/1] qemu support for ARM devices

2019-06-24 Thread Bruce Ashfield
Sorry for the delay. I was out of the office for a bit, and I'm having a look at this now. Bruce On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 11:45 AM Adrian Freihofer wrote: > > Hi, Bruce, > > Compared to v1, this is more or less a rewrite. It is now very similar to the > qemuarma15 BSP as suggested by you. > >

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH] Revert "fuse: require /dev/fuse reads to have enough buffer capacity"

2019-06-24 Thread Bruce Ashfield
I had queued -rc6 this morning .. and then noticed this. I've pushed the changes, so we are covered, now that the -dev kernel is updated. Bruce On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 5:39 AM wrote: > > From: Miklos Szeredi > > This reverts commit d4b13963f217dd947da5c0cabd1569e914d21699. > > The commit

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 1/1] xilinx-zynqmp: add the basic support xilinx-zynqmp

2019-06-13 Thread Bruce Ashfield
thanks~ > > git://git.yoctoproject.org/linux-yocto-dev > > > Cheers, > > Zumeng > > On 6/11/19 7:37 AM, Zumeng Chen wrote: > > > On 6/10/19 9:37 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 8:00 PM Zumeng Chen wrote: > > Sounds I like mean, no,

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 1/1] xilinx-zynqmp: add the basic support xilinx-zynqmp

2019-06-10 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 8:00 PM Zumeng Chen wrote: > > Sounds I like mean, no, I just talk the reality, Xilinx did like the > following: > > https://github.com/Xilinx/meta-xilinx/tree/master/meta-xilinx-bsp/recipes-kernel/linux/xilinx-kmeta/bsp > > I think they have a reason to share zynq-7000

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][PATCH 1/2] features: add qemu-guest

2019-06-09 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 8:49 AM Adrian Freihofer wrote: > > Purpose: Provide an easy way to add ARCH_VIRT=y to the kernel configuration. > This allows to boot ARM images compiled for real hardware in Qemu as well. > Including this feature e.g. into the Beaglebone BSP allows to: We already have

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][PATCH 0/2] qemu support for ARM devices

2019-06-09 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 8:49 AM Adrian Freihofer wrote: > > The purpose/idea is documented here: > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13384 Just cut and paste the reasons into the cover letter + patches. Not all reviews are done online and having the info quickly available for git

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 1/1] xilinx-zynqmp: add the basic support xilinx-zynqmp

2019-06-05 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 4:02 AM Zumeng Chen wrote: > > This patch is to add scc/cfg meta to build and boot zcu102 board with the bsp > of xilinx-zynqmp. > See some questions below. > Signed-off-by: Zumeng.Chen > --- > bsp/xilinx-zynqmp/xilinx-zynqmp-standard.scc | 8 + >

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 1/1] xilinx-zynqmp: add the basic support xilinx-zynqmp

2019-06-05 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 4:08 AM Zumeng Chen wrote: > > Hi Bruce, > > Forget this party :) > > > xilinx-zynqmp is arm64 BSP with cortexA53, and it seems stable in mainline > to build and boot, so I add it into linux-yocto-dev and yocto-kernel-cache. > This email is just about scc/cfg, no extra

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][PATCH 0/1] Add SCSI debug configuration for util-linux ptest

2019-06-03 Thread Bruce Ashfield
merged, and SRCREV bumps sent to the oe-core list. Bruce On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 6:32 PM Mariano López wrote: > > Hi Bruce, > > This will add the configuration options to enable the SCSI debug module > that is needed by the util-linux ptest package. This is needed to add > KERNEL_FEATURES in the

Re: [linux-yocto] v4.18.x - stable updates comprising v4.18.40

2019-06-03 Thread Bruce Ashfield
Thanks Paul, this is now merged. Bruce On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 10:24 PM Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > Bruce, Yocto kernel folks: > > Here is the next 4.18.x stable update "extension" primarily created > for the Yocto project, continuing from the previous v4.18.39 release. > > There are about 260

Re: [linux-yocto] [linux-yocto-rt v5.0/standard/preempt-rt/base][PATCH 1/1] i915: Use local irq lock instead of irq disable regions

2019-05-29 Thread Bruce Ashfield
I've refreshed all the 5.0 -rt versions, so this no longer applies. Can you check the latest changes on the branches and re-send if this is still required. Bruce On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 11:56 PM Liwei Song wrote: > > From: Jiping Ma > > Use a local_irq_lock as a replacement for irq off

Re: [linux-yocto] v4.18.x - stable updates comprising v4.18.39

2019-05-29 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:09 PM Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > Bruce, Yocto kernel folks: > > Here is the next 4.18.x stable update "extension" primarily created > for the Yocto project, continuing from the previous v4.18.38 release. > > There are about 180 commits here, based on commits chosen from

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >