Hi Jon,
Thanks for the pointers. Both the comment about reporting Contiki and the
note below about the MTU most likely not being 1280 (I think to remember
that I from memory can confirm this). I will post here again if/when I
have any news, but I currently fear that the project is getting b
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Søren Steen Christensen (lists)
wrote:
> Hi Pierre-emmanuel, all,
>
>
>
> Thanks for your fast feedback. I added the patch to the iz-tools and got the
> 6lowpan option J.
>
> After this I however unfortunately got the following errors while trying to
> continue fur
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Pierre-Emmanuel Goudet
wrote:
> Hi Soren, all,
>
>
>
> Indeed, you were missing the patch, as I did some times ago ;O)
>
>
>
> On my side the best I got was:
>
> - seeing 6LowPan frame sent from my interface, using a sniffer on my media.
>
> - seeing Rx’ed 6Lowpan
Hi Pierre-emmanuel, all,
Thanks for your fast feedback. I added the patch to the iz-tools and got the
6lowpan option J.
After this I however unfortunately got the following errors while trying to
continue further down your path:
The following commands fail as shown below:
# ping6 fe80:
Hi Soren, all,
Indeed, you were missing the patch, as I did some times ago ;O)
On my side the best I got was:
- seeing 6LowPan frame sent from my interface, using a sniffer on my media.
- seeing Rx'ed 6Lowpan frames (sent by a Contiki IPV6/RPL device on my media)
more or less decoded by the 6Low
