Linux backports [0] backports-v3.15-rc1 is out [1]. Please
go test and see if you can and break things or if see if
we've broken anything so far before a final release in
sync with Linus' releases. As usual development only happens
on the master branch, we'll then carry fixes onto the stable
branch
Linux backports [0] backports-v3.14-1 is out [1]. Thanks for Hauke
for taking the torch while I was in limbo. The release obviously
has all the things that upstream has so there's no point in mentioning
any of that, but new drivers are igb, added by Stefan. This release
also has a new backports-upd
3 new linux backports release are now available based on linux-next
tags next-20140320 [0] next-20140411 [1] and next-20140417 [2]. This
should mean that we can keep things in synch now almost daily, and
drivers can be tested with the latest code as-is on linux-next. We've
shaved off k
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
This will simplify the new reassembly backport
with no code changes being required.
CC: Alexander Smirnov
Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
Cc: linux-zigbee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: David S. Miller"
Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
Don't rely on driver files or other headers having this file included.
CC: Alexander Smirnov
Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
Cc: linux-zigbee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez
---
include/net/6lowpan.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
di
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
CC: Alexander Smirnov
Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
Cc: linux-zigbee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez
---
net/ieee802154/reassembly.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ieee802154/reassembly.c b/net/ieee8
Here's a few changes that can help automate the backport of 6lowpan.
I've been carrying them around for a while, I think its best to just
merge these upstream as its nothing controversial.
Luis R. Rodriguez (3):
6lowpan: add helper to get 6lowpan namespace
6lowpan: make lowpan_cb static
6low
Hi
I’ve just started using MRF24J40 on the Freescale i.MX233 CPU, using i.MX233
Olinuxino Maxi as prototype board.
This CPU does not support full duplex SPI which the current MRF24J40 driver
requires. I can’t see that it actually needs full duplex though:
it reads and writes in the same reques
