On 05/03/12 11:21, Felix Varghese wrote:
> On 5 March 2012 00:31, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Felix Varghese wrote:
>>> This is the terminology we tried to follow consistently
>>> in the code. If we are aiming for IEEE compliance and
>>> interope
On 5 March 2012 00:31, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Felix Varghese wrote:
>> On 3 March 2012 18:40, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
>>> Summary on all the patchset below.
>>>
>>> Prajosh, Felix. Thanks for your work on IEEE 802.15.4 for Linux. Please
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
wrote:
> On 04/03/12 23:19, Prajosh Premdas wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:31 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
>> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Felix Varghese wrote:
On 3 March 2012 18:40, Dmitry Eremin-Sol
On 04/03/12 23:19, Prajosh Premdas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:31 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Felix Varghese wrote:
>>> On 3 March 2012 18:40, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
Summary on all the patchset below.
Prajosh,
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:31 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Felix Varghese wrote:
>> On 3 March 2012 18:40, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
>>> Summary on all the patchset below.
>>>
>>> Prajosh, Felix. Thanks for your work on IEEE 802.15.4 for Lin
Hello,
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Felix Varghese wrote:
> On 3 March 2012 18:40, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
>> Summary on all the patchset below.
>>
>> Prajosh, Felix. Thanks for your work on IEEE 802.15.4 for Linux. Please
>> don't find my mails as discouraging or otherwise demoting yo
On 3 March 2012 18:40, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> Summary on all the patchset below.
>
> Prajosh, Felix. Thanks for your work on IEEE 802.15.4 for Linux. Please
> don't find my mails as discouraging or otherwise demoting your work.
> There are some coding standards. There are some ideas behi
Hello,
Prajosh. Please in future also send a cover letter containing a
description of your changes and a summary of patchset (check git
request-pull for a sample message format).
On 24/02/12 13:02, Prajosh Premdas wrote:
> mlme reset functionality has been added for netlink socket interface
> att
Summary on all the patchset below.
Prajosh, Felix. Thanks for your work on IEEE 802.15.4 for Linux. Please
don't find my mails as discouraging or otherwise demoting your work.
There are some coding standards. There are some ideas behind code. There
is more than just blindly following standard text
Hi Prajosh,
1. please NEVER send a private mails to Linux developers/maintainers,
always add appropriate list to CC. In case of David Miller you SHOULD
add net...@vger.kernel.org list.
2. Regarding review - every of us have main full-time work, please be
patient and wait for the reply.
3. When
Hi
I wanted help in reviewing these patches. Could anybody please review these
patches . If i have made any mistake in the patch format please point it
out to me.
Sorry for any obvious mistakes.
Regards
Prajosh Premdas
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Prajosh Premdas
wrote:
> mlme reset functi
I don't know what you expect to be done with these patches.
If you don't send them to net...@vger.kernel.org then as
far as I'm concerned they don't exist at all and I will not
apply them.
--
Virtualization & Cloud Manag
mlme reset functionality has been added for netlink socket interface
attributes mentioned are as per the IEEE 802.15.4 - 2006 specification
Tested on SAM9G20-EK board
Signed-off-by: Prajosh Premdas
---
include/linux/nl802154.h|2 +
include/net/ieee802154_netdev.h |2 +
include/n
13 matches
Mail list logo
