Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] Evaluating ZigBee under Linux

On 12/14/2011 09:35 AM, Prajosh Premdas wrote: > the libnl version should be 1.1. In this particular libnl the iz tools > compile I've pushed an (compile-tested-only) port of lowpan-tools to libnl3. > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 6:08 AM, Peter Naulls > wrote: > > >

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] Evaluating ZigBee under Linux

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Peter Naulls wrote: > On 12/14/2011 03:00 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Peter Naulls >>  wrote: >>> >>> On 12/14/2011 02:43 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote: You do know there is no Zigbee stack here, right? >>> >>>

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] Evaluating ZigBee under Linux

On 12/14/2011 03:00 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Peter Naulls > wrote: >> On 12/14/2011 02:43 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote: >>> You do know there is no Zigbee stack here, right? >>> >> >> No, I don't know that. I don't know what this means. That's >> why I as

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] Evaluating ZigBee under Linux

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Peter Naulls wrote: > On 12/14/2011 02:43 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote: >> You do know there is no Zigbee stack here, right? >> > > No, I don't know that.  I don't know what this means.  That's > why I asked my questions in the first place.  All I know > is that th

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] Evaluating ZigBee under Linux

On 12/14/2011 02:43 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote: > You do know there is no Zigbee stack here, right? > No, I don't know that. I don't know what this means. That's why I asked my questions in the first place. All I know is that there's a bunch of tools that relate to zigbee, and incidentally, t

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] Evaluating ZigBee under Linux

You do know there is no Zigbee stack here, right? On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Peter Naulls wrote: > On 12/14/2011 01:39 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote: >> Hello. >> > already. >> >> And what makes you think anyone here _must_ provide you with this >> information? Nobody here has a support contract

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] Evaluating ZigBee under Linux

On 12/14/2011 01:39 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > Hello. > already. > > And what makes you think anyone here _must_ provide you with this > information? Nobody here has a support contract with you. There was no must. I'm asking. You're under no obligation to respond. But if I don't get a straight

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] Evaluating ZigBee under Linux

Hello. On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 09:28, Peter Naulls wrote: > On 12/13/2011 09:35 PM, Prajosh Premdas wrote: > > the libnl version should be 1.1. In this particular libnl the iz tools > > compile > > Well, obviously. I said nearly as much in my post. But that doesn't > answer my question, which wa

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] Evaluating ZigBee under Linux

On 12/13/2011 09:35 PM, Prajosh Premdas wrote: > the libnl version should be 1.1. In this particular libnl the iz tools compile Well, obviously. I said nearly as much in my post. But that doesn't answer my question, which was if patches to later libnl exist for the tools. Downgrading the versi

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] Evaluating ZigBee under Linux

the libnl version should be 1.1. In this particular libnl the iz tools compile On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 6:08 AM, Peter Naulls wrote: > > Hi guys, I'm looking at Zigbee options for Linux. In practical > terms, there seems to be this project and the stuff done by > EmberZNet. > > My most immediate

[Linux-zigbee-devel] Evaluating ZigBee under Linux

Hi guys, I'm looking at Zigbee options for Linux. In practical terms, there seems to be this project and the stuff done by EmberZNet. My most immediate problem however is that the linux-zigbee tools don't compile for my eventual target (OpenWrt) since that has a rather newer version of libnl tha