On Apr 9, 2013, at 9:22 AM 4/9/13, Ralph Droms (rdroms)
wrote:
>
> On Apr 9, 2013, at 9:12 AM 4/9/13, Christophe Aeschlimann
>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> Le 09.04.2013 14:58, Alexander Aring a écrit :
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> SLAC based addressing is currently broken. I wrote some fixed for
On Apr 9, 2013, at 9:12 AM 4/9/13, Christophe Aeschlimann
wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Le 09.04.2013 14:58, Alexander Aring a écrit :
>
> [...]
>
>> SLAC based addressing is currently broken. I wrote some fixed for it
>> [1]. But Ralph Droms has a fix for this, too.
>
> Yeah I tested Ralph Droms
Hi Alex,
Le 09.04.2013 14:58, Alexander Aring a écrit :
[...]
> SLAC based addressing is currently broken. I wrote some fixed for it
> [1]. But Ralph Droms has a fix for this, too.
Yeah I tested Ralph Droms patches they seem to fix the problem here.
I'm going to test your patch as well. Thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 02:45:27PM +0200, Christophe Aeschlimann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering something about the addressing in general with 6lowpan
> over IEEE802.15.4.
>
> Shouldn't the two following commands set the same address if we want the
> 6lowpan ipv6 link local compression/dec
