Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] IZ problems

Hi I found a response "kinda" that suites my needs here . " I want to use my USB stick/serial dongle together with Linux IEEE 802.15.4 stack. 1. You need to implement a firmware for your hardware that will communicate with Linux kerne

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] IZ problems

On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 09:58:40AM +0100, Rafik Harzi wrote: > Hi > > I found a response "kinda" that suites my needs > here > . > > " I want to use my USB stick/serial dongle together with Linux IEEE > 802.15.4 stack. > >1. You need to

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] 802.15.4

On 06/03/14 23:06, Phoebe Buckheister wrote: > On Thu, March 6, 2014 10:24 pm, Martin Townsend wrote: >> I was going to start implementing some low level features of the >> 802.15.4 MAC layer in SW such as Inter Frame Gap, Clear Channel >> Assessment (including the backoff algorithm), and Acknowled

[Linux-zigbee-devel] [PATCH net-next v2] 6lowpan: reassembly: fix return of init function

This patch adds a missing return after fragmentation init. Otherwise we register a sysctl interface and deregister it afterwards which makes no sense. Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring --- Changes since v2: - remove goto out label and use return ret instead. net/ieee802154/reassembly.c | 5 +++--

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] IZ problems

No worries. thanks. - Rafik 2014-03-07 10:04 GMT+01:00 Alexander Aring : > On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 09:58:40AM +0100, Rafik Harzi wrote: > > Hi > > > > I found a response "kinda" that suites my needs > > here > > . > > > > " I want to use

[Linux-zigbee-devel] Simplifying the 802.15.4 stack

Hi, the 802.15.4/6LoWPAN stack on Linux is pretty usable as it is now, much due to the recent 6lowpan fixes by Alex. We can drive different radio chips on different frequencies, IPv6 works well and we interoperate just fine with RFC compliant stacks like the one implemented in Contiki. There are,

[Linux-zigbee-devel] Simplifying the 802.15.4 stack

(resent because I forgot CCs at first) Hi, the 802.15.4/6LoWPAN stack on Linux is pretty usable as it is now, much due to the recent 6lowpan fixes by Alex. We can drive different radio chips on different frequencies, IPv6 works well and we interoperate just fine with RFC compliant stacks like the

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] Simplifying the 802.15.4 stack

Phoebe Buckheister wrote: > the 802.15.4/6LoWPAN stack on Linux is pretty usable as it is now, much > due to the recent 6lowpan fixes by Alex. Indeed, thanks to the work both of you did ! Regarding the proposed massive changes, I think everyone who had a closer look at the stack knows that (too)

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] Simplifying the 802.15.4 stack

On Fri, March 7, 2014 8:38 pm, Werner Almesberger wrote: >> 1) header handling in the stack >> 2) endianness in the stack > > I don't care much about these, but jumping between byte orders is > certainly confusing. As long as an API user can tell easily and > unambiguously what was or will be in th

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] [PATCH net-next v2] 6lowpan: reassembly: fix return of init function

From: Alexander Aring Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 11:06:54 +0100 > This patch adds a missing return after fragmentation init. Otherwise we > register a sysctl interface and deregister it afterwards which makes no > sense. > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring > --- > Changes since v2: > - remove goto

Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] Simplifying the 802.15.4 stack

Hello, On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Phoebe Buckheister wrote: > Hi, > > the 802.15.4/6LoWPAN stack on Linux is pretty usable as it is now, much > due to the recent 6lowpan fixes by Alex. We can drive different radio > chips on different frequencies, IPv6 works well and we interoperate > just f