I have Linuxbios boot from DOC successfuly. But I can not get my
2-channel-video-monitor-card up.
When I load the driver, it shows
PCI: No IRQ Known for interrupt pin A of device 02:04.0. Please try using pci=biosirq
The driver can not get IRQ, and it can not work.
If I boot from BIOS with
I have Linuxbios boot from DOC successfuly. But I can not get my
2-channel-video-monitor-card up.
When I load the driver, it shows
PCI: No IRQ Known for interrupt pin A of device 02:04.0. Please
try using pci=biosirq
The driver can not get IRQ, and it can not work.
If I boot from BIOS
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, David Xiong wrote:
I have Linuxbios boot from DOC successfuly. But I can not get my
2-channel-video-monitor-card up.
When I load the driver, it shows
PCI: No IRQ Known for interrupt pin A of device 02:04.0. Please try using
pci=biosirq
The driver can not get IRQ,
Can anyone give me advice on what will acheive the fastest boot time?
My options are the LinuxBIOS coupled with a DOC root or with root
configured on hda1 (IDE). I boot into X and I'll need standard
modules loaded. I'd like to fit the entire install on a DOC but only
IF I'll get a faster
I think the right guy to talk to here is Andrew Ip.
ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, Steve M. Gehlbach wrote:
You need to make and run the program util/getpir (using the original BIOS,
running Linux) to make the file irq_tables.c, then copy that file into the
mainboard directory, and set the option HAVE_PIRQ_TABLE=1. Linuxbios when
it starts will copy
Dear LinuxBiosers,
I'm afraid this topic is a bit off
topic, but I thought you guys would be the best to ask as LinuxBios
doesn't load option roms. I have a Diamond Stealth 64 Dram PCI card
which I have removed the option rom from (and placed in an antistatic
Sunday, September 29, 2002, 5:26:37 PM, you wrote:
RGM On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, Christopher Bergeron wrote:
Can anyone give me advice on what will acheive the fastest boot time?
My options are the LinuxBIOS coupled with a DOC root or with root
configured on hda1 (IDE). I boot into X and I'll
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, Ronald G Minnich wrote:
It is not faster. But it is faster to load a kernel from linux while the
^ DoC
slow IDE spins up. Then once the kernel is in there it can go to IDE.
ron
Hi, what's the kernel patches that I can use for
Via chipsets? /src/kernel_patches are mostly SiS based, and does actual SDR
initialization works for DDR too?
Thanks!
CM.
On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 07:00, Christopher Bergeron wrote:
Sunday, September 29, 2002, 5:26:37 PM, you wrote:
RGM On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, Christopher Bergeron wrote:
Can anyone give me advice on what will acheive the fastest boot time?
My options are the LinuxBIOS coupled with a DOC root
I have a board with gx1, pc97317 and cs5530a with one ide slot. I've been
booting linux with Phoenix bios so far with no problems, and I tried
linuxBIOS to boot linux. but I noticed strange C/H/S values like init_drive
sectors_per_track=[768], num_heads=[768], num_cylinders=[768]. and it
failed
So DoC _IS_ faster than IDE? If this is the case, why should it be
that mounting it with /dev/hda1 as root would make for a faster boot?
By my logic, I would think that having /boot and /root on a DoC would
make it faster.
DoC _IS_NOT_ faster than IDE. IDE HD has the problem it need to
Hello from Gregg C Levine
Steve? How so? How did you physically connect the CF card to your IDE bus? I
know a number of adapters exist to enable that feature, and I know that the
2.4 series contains the MTD (Memory Technology Drivers) functions directly,
but after that, I'm lost.
Gregg C Levine
Hello from Gregg C Levine
Steve? How so? How did you physically connect the CF card to your
IDE bus? I
know a number of adapters exist to enable that feature, and I
know that the
2.4 series contains the MTD (Memory Technology Drivers) functions
directly,
but after that, I'm lost.
CF is
15 matches
Mail list logo