PCI: No IRQ Known for interrupt pin A of device 02:04.0. Please try using pci=biosirq

2002-09-29 Thread David Xiong
I have Linuxbios boot from DOC successfuly. But I can not get my 2-channel-video-monitor-card up. When I load the driver, it shows PCI: No IRQ Known for interrupt pin A of device 02:04.0. Please try using pci=biosirq The driver can not get IRQ, and it can not work. If I boot from BIOS with

RE: No IRQ Known for interrupt pin A of device 02:04.0. Please try using pci=biosirq

2002-09-29 Thread Steve M. Gehlbach
I have Linuxbios boot from DOC successfuly. But I can not get my 2-channel-video-monitor-card up. When I load the driver, it shows PCI: No IRQ Known for interrupt pin A of device 02:04.0. Please try using pci=biosirq The driver can not get IRQ, and it can not work. If I boot from BIOS

Re: PCI: No IRQ Known for interrupt pin A of device 02:04.0. Pleasetry using pci=biosirq

2002-09-29 Thread Ronald G Minnich
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, David Xiong wrote: I have Linuxbios boot from DOC successfuly. But I can not get my 2-channel-video-monitor-card up. When I load the driver, it shows PCI: No IRQ Known for interrupt pin A of device 02:04.0. Please try using pci=biosirq The driver can not get IRQ,

DOC vs. IDE

2002-09-29 Thread Christopher Bergeron
Can anyone give me advice on what will acheive the fastest boot time? My options are the LinuxBIOS coupled with a DOC root or with root configured on hda1 (IDE). I boot into X and I'll need standard modules loaded. I'd like to fit the entire install on a DOC but only IF I'll get a faster

Re: PCChips M758LMR+

2002-09-29 Thread Ronald G Minnich
I think the right guy to talk to here is Andrew Ip. ron ___ Linuxbios mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios

RE: No IRQ Known for interrupt pin A of device 02:04.0. Please tryusing pci=biosirq

2002-09-29 Thread Ronald G Minnich
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, Steve M. Gehlbach wrote: You need to make and run the program util/getpir (using the original BIOS, running Linux) to make the file irq_tables.c, then copy that file into the mainboard directory, and set the option HAVE_PIRQ_TABLE=1. Linuxbios when it starts will copy

OT: Diamond Stealth 64 DRAM PCI on Linux Framebuffer w/o Option Rom?

2002-09-29 Thread Lee
Dear LinuxBiosers, I'm afraid this topic is a bit off topic, but I thought you guys would be the best to ask as LinuxBios doesn't load option roms. I have a Diamond Stealth 64 Dram PCI card which I have removed the option rom from (and placed in an antistatic

Re[2]: DOC vs. IDE

2002-09-29 Thread Christopher Bergeron
Sunday, September 29, 2002, 5:26:37 PM, you wrote: RGM On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, Christopher Bergeron wrote: Can anyone give me advice on what will acheive the fastest boot time? My options are the LinuxBIOS coupled with a DOC root or with root configured on hda1 (IDE). I boot into X and I'll

Re[2]: DOC vs. IDE

2002-09-29 Thread Ronald G Minnich
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, Ronald G Minnich wrote: It is not faster. But it is faster to load a kernel from linux while the ^ DoC slow IDE spins up. Then once the kernel is in there it can go to IDE. ron

Kernel patches for VIA Eden chipsets.

2002-09-29 Thread CMZ
Hi, what's the kernel patches that I can use for Via chipsets? /src/kernel_patches are mostly SiS based, and does actual SDR initialization works for DDR too? Thanks! CM.

Re: Re[2]: DOC vs. IDE

2002-09-29 Thread ollie lho
On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 07:00, Christopher Bergeron wrote: Sunday, September 29, 2002, 5:26:37 PM, you wrote: RGM On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, Christopher Bergeron wrote: Can anyone give me advice on what will acheive the fastest boot time? My options are the LinuxBIOS coupled with a DOC root

nonsense C/H/S values for CF (used in ide)

2002-09-29 Thread Q-ha Park
I have a board with gx1, pc97317 and cs5530a with one ide slot. I've been booting linux with Phoenix bios so far with no problems, and I tried linuxBIOS to boot linux. but I noticed strange C/H/S values like init_drive sectors_per_track=[768], num_heads=[768], num_cylinders=[768]. and it failed

RE: Re[2]: DOC vs. IDE

2002-09-29 Thread Steve M. Gehlbach
So DoC _IS_ faster than IDE? If this is the case, why should it be that mounting it with /dev/hda1 as root would make for a faster boot? By my logic, I would think that having /boot and /root on a DoC would make it faster. DoC _IS_NOT_ faster than IDE. IDE HD has the problem it need to

Re: Re[2]: DOC vs. IDE

2002-09-29 Thread Gregg C Levine
Hello from Gregg C Levine Steve? How so? How did you physically connect the CF card to your IDE bus? I know a number of adapters exist to enable that feature, and I know that the 2.4 series contains the MTD (Memory Technology Drivers) functions directly, but after that, I'm lost. Gregg C Levine

RE: Re[2]: DOC vs. IDE

2002-09-29 Thread Steve M. Gehlbach
Hello from Gregg C Levine Steve? How so? How did you physically connect the CF card to your IDE bus? I know a number of adapters exist to enable that feature, and I know that the 2.4 series contains the MTD (Memory Technology Drivers) functions directly, but after that, I'm lost. CF is