why does the Linux kernel use bitkeeper?
YH
-Original Message-
From: Ronald G. Minnich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 1:09 PM
To: linuxbios@clustermatic.org
Subject: we need to sequence this
we need a 'controlled shutdown' of the cvs project so we
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 14:32, YhLu wrote:
why does the Linux kernel use bitkeeper?
YH
The King (God?) said so.
Ollie
-Original Message-
From: Ronald G. Minnich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 1:09 PM
To: linuxbios@clustermatic.org
Subject: we
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, YhLu wrote:
why does the Linux kernel use bitkeeper?
because it is really really good. Xen uses it too.
IBM uses it extensively and they were trying to convince us to use it for
linuxbios.
But Larry's 'rules of engagement' for free use of the software are not
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:23:48 -0700, Li-Ta Lo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 14:32, YhLu wrote:
why does the Linux kernel use bitkeeper?
YH
I seem to remember it was because bitkeeper has really advanced patch
handling and merging tools.
--
Richard A. Smith
* Ronald G. Minnich rminnich@lanl.gov [050308 22:08]:
we need a 'controlled shutdown' of the cvs project so we can do a clean
cut over to tla.
Can we pick a day and time? midnight this saturday or some such? Do we all
trust tla enough to go for it?
I've not seen any problems since
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
How does closing the tree work? We can also tag it and leave it sitting
there with a notice that it is obsolete.
I am not sure how to close it. Possibly remove all developers this
weekend.
And, no commits post-midnight of this sunday.
Something
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 14:35, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
The biggest problem with arch is that it does not work well on a
windows machine. Mostly because of limitations of windows
filesystems. I believe most of the issues go away if you
don't have your repository on a windows box. Plus there
Li-Ta Lo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 14:35, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
The biggest problem with arch is that it does not work well on a
windows machine. Mostly because of limitations of windows
filesystems. I believe most of the issues go away if you
don't have your
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 15:23, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Li-Ta Lo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 14:35, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
The biggest problem with arch is that it does not work well on a
windows machine. Mostly because of limitations of windows
filesystems. I
Li-Ta Lo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
??? I thought vfat support long filenames.
I believe it is the length of the pathname rather than individual filenames.
Although some filenames may also be affected. I really don't understand
it either. This is my dim recollection from watching some of the
??? I thought vfat support long filenames.
I believe it is the length of the pathname rather than individual filenames.
Although some filenames may also be affected. I really don't understand
it either. This is my dim recollection from watching some of the
conversation.
It probally
11 matches
Mail list logo