Mohan Nayaka wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Rony gnulinux...@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting article and it mentions the sudo vulnerability that I
mentioned in the earlier mail. since a long time I have been using sudo
with password entry set for every time. Anyway guys what extra
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Rony gnulinux...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't want to stop scripts, only bad ones. Anyway I will look up
noscript. Thanks.
The idea would be to disable all scripting and then only allow on a
case to case basis. But that can become quite frustrating due to the
fact
On Monday 11 May 2009, Anurag wrote:
2009/5/11 Rony gnulinux...@gmail.com:
It was just that but my query is how secure is browsing in Linux if
javascript is enabled, given the fact that this sticky window would
refuse to go? Does enabling of scripting in firefox bypass the Unix file
self
Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Rony gnulinux...@gmail.com wrote:
It was just that but my query is how secure is browsing in Linux if
javascript is enabled, given the fact that this sticky window would
refuse to go? Does enabling of scripting in firefox bypass
Anurag wrote:
2009/5/11 Rony gnulinux...@gmail.com:
It was just that but my query is how secure is browsing in Linux if
javascript is enabled, given the fact that this sticky window would
refuse to go? Does enabling of scripting in firefox bypass the Unix file
self execute permission
Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar
siddhesh.poyare...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't seem to find the blog post off-hand, I think someone at work
had pointed us to it. Will post the link when I find it.
http://www.geekzone.co.nz/foobar/6229
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Rony gnulinux...@gmail.com wrote:
Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar
siddhesh.poyare...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't seem to find the blog post off-hand, I think someone at work
had pointed us to it. Will post the link
Anurag wrote:
2009/5/10 Rony gnulinux...@gmail.com:
Hello,
My family members were checking some information on google using the
laptop loaded with Lenny. After some time, they got a message saying
that there was a lot of trojan and 'blah blah' infection in their system
and they should
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Anurag anu...@gnuer.org wrote:
From what I understand of mozilla's javascript engine, it runs inside
a sandbox and has no permission to do anything with the operating
system. A javascript code wouldn't be able to automagically download
files and set chmod
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar
siddhesh.poyare...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't seem to find the blog post off-hand, I think someone at work
had pointed us to it. Will post the link when I find it.
http://www.geekzone.co.nz/foobar/6229
http://www.geekzone.co.nz/foobar/6236
Rony wrote:
It was just that but my query is how secure is browsing in Linux if
javascript is enabled, given the fact that this sticky window would
refuse to go? Does enabling of scripting in firefox bypass the Unix file
self execute permission barrier?
Uhm...well it is very much
2009/5/11 Rony gnulinux...@gmail.com:
It was just that but my query is how secure is browsing in Linux if
javascript is enabled, given the fact that this sticky window would
refuse to go? Does enabling of scripting in firefox bypass the Unix file
self execute permission barrier?
From what I
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Rony gnulinux...@gmail.com wrote:
It was just that but my query is how secure is browsing in Linux if
javascript is enabled, given the fact that this sticky window would
refuse to go? Does enabling of scripting in firefox bypass the Unix file
self execute
2009/5/11 Rony gnulinux...@gmail.com:
It was just that but my query is how secure is browsing in Linux if
javascript is enabled, given the fact that this sticky window would
refuse to go? Does enabling of scripting in firefox bypass the Unix file
self execute permission barrier?
From what I
14 matches
Mail list logo
