On the majority of 85xx 86xx we have a register that's ability to
assert HRESET_REQ to reset the board. We refactored that code so it
can be shared between both platforms into fsl_soc.c and removed all
the duplication in each platform directory.
---
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8641_hpcn.dts |
On Wed, Oct 03 2007, Grant Likely wrote:
Jens,
Here are some more Sysace patches based on comments received on the
first series and a run through sparse. Can you please queue them up
for 2.6.24?
Applied all 3, looked fine to me.
--
Jens Axboe
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:40:44 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+++ linux-work/drivers/edac/cell-edac.c 2007-10-04 15:34:46.0
+1000
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
+#include linux/module.h
+#include linux/init.h
+#include linux/platform_device.h
+#include
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 17:00 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:40:44 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+++ linux-work/drivers/edac/cell-edac.c 2007-10-04 15:34:46.0
+1000
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
+#include linux/module.h
+#include
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 22:50 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
From: Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dcr.c is an arch/powerpc only thing.
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Ben/Paulus,
As far as I can tell this is correct. Having sysdev/dcr.c in the arch/ppc
build spits out
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 05:56 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 22:50 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
From: Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dcr.c is an arch/powerpc only thing.
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Ben/Paulus,
As far as I can tell this is
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 21:08:04 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 05:56 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 22:50 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
From: Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dcr.c is an arch/powerpc only thing.
So, like, the other day Kumar Gala mumbled:
On Oct 3, 2007, at 10:41 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:09:33 -0500 Jon Loeliger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/86xx/mpc8610_hpcd.c
+#include linux/stddef.h
+#include linux/kernel.h
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 08:02:42AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Exactly, this is what that patch is trying to do. QEIC cascade handler is
calling mpic's eoi() (end() actually, as it's flow level, but end == eoi.
Is it main objection? Ok, I can get rid of it, and use chip level
On Oct 4, 2007, at 7:48 AM, Jon Loeliger wrote:
So, like, the other day Kumar Gala mumbled:
On Oct 3, 2007, at 10:41 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:09:33 -0500 Jon Loeliger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/86xx/mpc8610_hpcd.c
+#include
asm-powerpc/mpc85xx.h was really a hold over from arch/ppc. Now that
more decoupling has occurred we can remove asm/mpc85xx.h and some of
its legacy.
As part of this we moved the definition of CPM_MAP_ADDR into cpm2_common
for 85xx platforms. This is a stop gap until we switch them over to the
Hi Bernard,
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 08:49:12PM +, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 09:41:28 +0200, Willaert, Bernard wrote:
Problem:
When we log debug output via the serial console on a multithreaded
application, the console throughput may get clogged and then we
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 07:27:30PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
The thing to remember is that sym2 is in transition from being a dual
BSD/Linux driver to being a purely Linux driver.
I was wondering about that; couldn't tell if the split in the code
was historical, or being intentionally
Alan Bennett wrote:
Do you know what would cause this?
I've configured a board to console off of SMC1 (ttyCPM0) and on 1
board it works fine, however a new revision of the board I get the
following result and lose the console. Both boards have exact
versions of the kernel and u-boot.
Do you know what would cause this?
I've configured a board to console off of SMC1 (ttyCPM0) and on 1
board it works fine, however a new revision of the board I get the
following result and lose the console. Both boards have exact
versions of the kernel and u-boot.
BAD: console handover: boot
Kumar, can you pull this patch into your 2.6.24 tree? It's needed for the 8610.
Timur Tabi wrote:
Update the definition of the global utilities structure (ccsr_guts) in
immap_86xx.h and add some related macros for the Freescale 8610 SOC.
Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
From: Anton Vorontsov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PATCH] [POWERPC] QEIC: Implement pluggable handlers, fix MPIC
cascading
set_irq_chained_handler overwrites MPIC's handle_irq function
(handle_fasteoi_irq) thus MPIC never gets eoi event from the
cascaded IRQ. This situation hangs MPIC on
Kumar, this is what I get when I compile your 2.6.24 branch for the 8610:
CC arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.o
In file included from arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c:40:
include/asm/cpm2.h:14:21: error: asm/cpm.h: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.o] Error 1
On Oct 4, 2007, at 5:28 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
Kumar, this is what I get when I compile your 2.6.24 branch for the
8610:
CC arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.o
In file included from arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c:40:
include/asm/cpm2.h:14:21: error: asm/cpm.h: No such file or directory
On 10/2/07, Tony Breeds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 10:30:16AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
I realise it'll make the patch bigger, but this doesn't seem like a
particularly good name for the variable anymore.
Sure, what about?
Clarify when RTAS logging is enabled.
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 03:50:05PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 06:23:09PM +0400, Valentine Barshak wrote:
David Gibson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 03:36:27PM +0400, Valentine Barshak wrote:
Looking deeper at this I've found that currently u-boot thinks that
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 06:58:49PM -0700, Mark A. Greer wrote:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 03:50:05PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 06:23:09PM +0400, Valentine Barshak wrote:
David Gibson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 03:36:27PM +0400, Valentine Barshak wrote:
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 12:25:54PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 06:58:49PM -0700, Mark A. Greer wrote:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 03:50:05PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 06:23:09PM +0400, Valentine Barshak wrote:
David Gibson wrote:
On Mon,
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 07:59:30PM -0700, Mark A. Greer wrote:
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 12:25:54PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
The zImage is already hardware and
firmware specific;
And [potentially] firmware version and zImage size specific.
I meant to add, which is why it'll be difficult
On Oct 4, 2007, at 5:03 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
Kumar, can you pull this patch into your 2.6.24 tree? It's needed
for the 8610.
applied.
- k
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Early in the 2.6.23 cycle we broke the ability to offline cpu0
(7ccb4a662462616f6be5053e26b79580e02f1529). This patch fixes that by
ensuring that the (xics) default irq server, will not be 0 when taking
cpu0 offline.
Also catches a use of irq, when virq should be used (I think that the
last
On Sep 25, 2007, at 9:34 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
8 bytes padding required to match MPC85xx registers layout.
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
arch/powerpc/sysdev/qe_lib/qe_io.c |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Oct 4, 2007, at 5:05 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
From: Anton Vorontsov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PATCH] [POWERPC] QEIC: Implement pluggable handlers, fix
MPIC cascading
set_irq_chained_handler overwrites MPIC's handle_irq function
(handle_fasteoi_irq) thus MPIC never gets eoi
28 matches
Mail list logo
