[PATCH] Add for_each_child_of_node() helper for iterating over child nodes

2007-11-26 Thread Michael Ellerman
Add for_each_child_of_node() to encapsulate the common idiom of iterating over the children of a device_node. Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- After conducting a straw pole of powerpc hackers, this seems to be the preferred name for such a beast. include/linux/of.h |4

Re: [PATCH] ehea: Add kdump support

2007-11-26 Thread Michael Ellerman
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 14:33 +0100, Thomas Klein wrote: To support ehea driver reloading in a kdump kernel the driver has to perform firmware handle deregistrations when the original kernel crashes. As there's currently no notifier chain for machine crashes this patch enables kdump support in

Re: [PATCH] Add for_each_child_of_node() helper for iterating over child nodes

2007-11-26 Thread Stephen Rothwell
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:03:45 +1100 (EST) Michael Ellerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Add for_each_child_of_node() to encapsulate the common idiom of iterating over the children of a device_node. Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Stephen Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Access to PCI Expansion ROMs on PPC

2007-11-26 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 11:41:01AM -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote: I was looking around for a description of the ROM layout, and instead I found this: http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn/tn2000.html It was relevant because it explicitly mentioned enabling the PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY bit in the

Re: Access to PCI Expansion ROMs on PPC

2007-11-26 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 00:59 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote: Regarding the sub-thread on x86 emulation, that is totally out of scope for this. The 'AtomBIOS' of the ATI cards, consists of multiple parts (I may have minor errors here, ask airlied if you need more clarification): a)

Re: [PATCH revised 3/4] powerpc: Add EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for symbols required by fs_enet and cpm_uart

2007-11-26 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Vitaly, Maybe this is a stupid question, but why did you choose EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL and not EXPORT_SYMBOL? To prevent using those pointers from within non-GPL modules. kind of policy now... In particular in this case, as these pointers are currently not exported, at all. They are

[PATCH 1/3] [NET] phy/fixed.c: rework to not duplicate PHY layer functionality

2007-11-26 Thread Vitaly Bordug
With that patch fixed.c now fully emulates MDIO bus, thus no need to duplicate PHY layer functionality. That, in turn, drastically simplifies the code, and drops down line count. As an additional bonus, now there is no need to register MDIO bus for each PHY, all emulated PHYs placed on the

[PATCH 3/3] [POWERPC] MPC8349E-mITX: Vitesse 7385 PHY is not connected to the MDIO bus

2007-11-26 Thread Vitaly Bordug
...thus use fixed-link to register proper Fixed PHY Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Vitaly Bordug [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8349emitx.dts | 11 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [PATCH 2/3] [POWERPC] fsl_soc: add support for gianfar for fixed-link property

2007-11-26 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 17:29 +0300, Vitaly Bordug wrote: fixed-link says: register new Fixed/emulated PHY, i.e. PHY that not connected to the real MDIO bus. Signed-off-by: Vitaly Bordug [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

Re: [PATCH 1/3] [POWERPC] Add docs for Freescale 83xx SATA device tree nodes

2007-11-26 Thread Kumar Gala
On Nov 25, 2007, at 4:22 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Wednesday 21 November 2007, Kumar Gala wrote: +* Freescale 8xxx/3.0 Gb/s SATA nodes + +SATA nodes are defined to describe on-chip Serial ATA controllers. +Each SATA port should have its own node. + +Required

Re: [PATCH] ehea: Add kdump support

2007-11-26 Thread Luke Browning
On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 19:16 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: Hi Thomas, I'm sorry, but this patch is all wrong IMHO. For kdump we have to assume that the kernel is fundamentally broken, we've panicked, so something bad has happened - every line of kernel code that is run decreases the

Re: [PATCH 3/3] [POWERPC] Add docs for Freescale DMA DMA channel device tree nodes

2007-11-26 Thread Scott Wood
Timur Tabi wrote: David Gibson wrote: Indeed, indexing or writing into shared registers is exactly what cell-index is for. I don't care whether it's cell-index or device-id, but I need to know which DMA controller is #0 and which one is #1, and I need to know which channel is #0, which

Re: [RFC/PATCHv3] powerpc: Move CPM command handling into the cpm drivers

2007-11-26 Thread Scott Wood
Jochen Friedrich wrote: diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/commproc.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/commproc.c index f6a6378..2426bcb 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/commproc.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/commproc.c @@ -240,6 +240,34 @@ void __init cpm_reset(void) #endif } +static

Sequoia EMAC only works if u-boot initializes it?

2007-11-26 Thread Steven A. Falco
I have noticed odd behavior on a Sequoia board. Kernel is built from DENX git, ARCH=powerpc, 2.6.23.1. Sequence that works: 1) In u-boot, do dhcp (this initializes the PHY) 2) Boot linux from flash 3) ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.101 netmask 255.255.255.0 up Ethernet is now functional, and I can

Re: [PATCH 1/3] [POWERPC] Add docs for Freescale 83xx SATA device tree nodes

2007-11-26 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Monday 26 November 2007, you wrote: On Nov 25, 2007, at 4:22 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: Should this maybe also mandate a compatible property that is defined in a way to match the generic (p)ata_of_platform driver? Is there something about the (p)ata_of_platform driver you think we   can

Re: Sequoia EMAC only works if u-boot initializes it?

2007-11-26 Thread Josh Boyer
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 10:59:35 -0500 Steven A. Falco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have noticed odd behavior on a Sequoia board. Kernel is built from DENX git, ARCH=powerpc, 2.6.23.1. Sequence that works: 1) In u-boot, do dhcp (this initializes the PHY) 2) Boot linux from flash 3) ifconfig

Re: Revisited, audio codec device tree entries.

2007-11-26 Thread Timur Tabi
David Gibson wrote: 1) We have a universal device-tree-based fabric driver which parses all the above-described interconnection information in the device tree and handles any situation. Cool, but probably a lot of work and fiddly to get right. Definitely a lot of work. I suggest we

Re: time accounting problem (powerpc only?)

2007-11-26 Thread Johannes Berg
Contrary to what I claimed later in the thread, my 64-bit powerpc box (quad-core G5) doesn't suffer from this problem. Does anybody have any idea? I don't even know how to debug it further. johannes signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Sequoia EMAC only works if u-boot initializes it?

2007-11-26 Thread Stefan Roese
On Monday 26 November 2007, Steven A. Falco wrote: I have noticed odd behavior on a Sequoia board. Kernel is built from DENX git, ARCH=powerpc, 2.6.23.1. Sequence that works: 1) In u-boot, do dhcp (this initializes the PHY) 2) Boot linux from flash 3) ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.101 netmask

Re: [RFC/PATCH] powerpc: Move CPM command handling into the cpm drivers

2007-11-26 Thread Scott Wood
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 12:51:21AM +0300, Vitaly Bordug wrote: Even that might be not enough - we may have simultaneous call of this func in non-smp case... Do you really think that every piece of code that uses spinlocks in the kernel is broken on non-SMP? I was thinking of some kind of

Re: Revisited, audio codec device tree entries.

2007-11-26 Thread Jon Smirl
On 11/26/07, Timur Tabi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Gibson wrote: 1) We have a universal device-tree-based fabric driver which parses all the above-described interconnection information in the device tree and handles any situation. Cool, but probably a lot of work and fiddly to

Re: sys_mpc83xx spi driver not probed

2007-11-26 Thread Scott Wood
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 07:02:23PM +0200, Joel Rouch wrote: I have a custom 8349 ppc board. I have defined the spi master in the configuration. While booting my board, I driver is well added and linked to platform bus, however I don't see that the probe entry point is reached. I don't

Re: Revisited, audio codec device tree entries.

2007-11-26 Thread Timur Tabi
Jon Smirl wrote: I'm fixing up the asoc v2 code to use MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() and the real kernel aliasing/insmod system. Half of why we are having trouble is because asoc isn't using this mechanism. I've posted patches fixing i2c to use the same mechanism. I don't have the asoc ones ready

[PATCH] powerpc: kill sparse warning in HPTE_V_COMPARE()

2007-11-26 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
sparse warning: constant 0xff80 is so big it is unsigned long Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- include/asm-powerpc/mmu-hash64.h |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/include/asm-powerpc/mmu-hash64.h +++

Re: [RFC/PATCHv3] powerpc: Move CPM command handling into the cpm drivers

2007-11-26 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Scott, +spin_lock_irqsave(cmd_lock, flags); I'm a little uneasy about this -- what's the longest it can take for the CPM command to complete (or timeout)? I'd rather use a mutex, if we can make sure that it's never called from atomic context. Unfortunately, fs_enet may call this

Re: sys_mpc83xx spi driver not probed

2007-11-26 Thread Joel Rouch
Unfortunately not as I still need to use ARCH=ppc. I am just using a platform_driver_probe() from the module_init. static int __init mpc83xx_spi_init(void) { return platform_driver_probe(mpc83xx_spi_driver, mpc83xx_spi_probe); } Thanks Scott Wood wrote: On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 07:02:23PM

[RFC/PATCHv4] powerpc: Move CPM command handling into the cpm drivers

2007-11-26 Thread Jochen Friedrich
This patch moves the CPM command handling into commproc.c for CPM1 and cpm2_common.c. This is yet another preparation to get rid of drivers accessing the CPM via the global cpmp. Signed-off-by: Jochen Friedrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- arch/powerpc/sysdev/commproc.c | 28

Re: [RFC/PATCHv4] powerpc: Move CPM command handling into the cpm drivers

2007-11-26 Thread Scott Wood
Jochen Friedrich wrote: This patch moves the CPM command handling into commproc.c for CPM1 and cpm2_common.c. This is yet another preparation to get rid of drivers accessing the CPM via the global cpmp. Signed-off-by: Jochen Friedrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Scott Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[patch 3/9] ps3fb: Kill PS3FB_FULL_MODE_BIT

2007-11-26 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
From: Geert Uytterhoeven [EMAIL PROTECTED] ps3fb: Kill PS3FB_FULL_MODE_BIT, use PS3AV_MODE_FULL instead Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/video/ps3fb.c |8 +++- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/video/ps3fb.c +++

[patch 7/9] ps3fb: Configurable black borders

2007-11-26 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
From: Geert Uytterhoeven [EMAIL PROTECTED] ps3fb: Allow all video modes where the visible resolution plus the black borders matches a native resolution Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- drivers/video/ps3fb.c | 69 +++--- 1 files

[patch 5/9] ps3fb: Kill ps3fb_res

2007-11-26 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
From: Geert Uytterhoeven [EMAIL PROTECTED] ps3fb: kill ps3fb_res[], as all information it contains can be obtained in some other way. Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/video/ps3fb.c | 108 ++ 1 files changed, 22

Re: sys_mpc83xx spi driver not probed

2007-11-26 Thread Anton Vorontsov
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 10:39:56AM -0600, Scott Wood wrote: On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 07:02:23PM +0200, Joel Rouch wrote: I have a custom 8349 ppc board. I have defined the spi master in the configuration. While booting my board, I driver is well added and linked to platform bus, however

Re: Access to PCI Expansion ROMs on PPC

2007-11-26 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 11:33:00AM -0500, Jon Smirl wrote: Did you check out the cards on x86 and ascertain that they have the standard PCI header in them? 55 AA All PCI ROMs are supposed to have that. If they are missing that the size code in the rom.c isn't going to work right. See my

Re: [RFC/PATCHv4] powerpc: Move CPM command handling into the cpm drivers

2007-11-26 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Monday 26 November 2007, Jochen Friedrich wrote: This patch moves the CPM command handling into commproc.c for CPM1 and cpm2_common.c. This is yet another preparation to get rid of drivers accessing the CPM via the global cpmp. Signed-off-by: Jochen Friedrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by:

Re: Sequoia EMAC only works if u-boot initializes it?

2007-11-26 Thread Steven A. Falco
I've attached a copy of my bootlog. I added in one patch to enable rgmii but that didn't fix it. (http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-October/043435.html) I am curious why the new emac driver is enabled in the DENX tree but not in the upstream trees. Has DENX successfully used

Re: Sequoia EMAC only works if u-boot initializes it?

2007-11-26 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 14:10 -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote: I've attached a copy of my bootlog. I added in one patch to enable rgmii but that didn't fix it.(http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-October/043435.html) I am curious why the new emac driver is enabled in the DENX tree but

Re: dtc: Remove some redundant testcases

2007-11-26 Thread Jon Loeliger
So, like, the other day David Gibson mumbled: This patch removes a number of testcases from the testsuite that are extremely unlikely to find any bugs that won't be found by the other tests. This speeds up the testsuite. - Both loops across the various tree block layouts run the

Re: [RFC/PATCH] powerpc: Move CPM command handling into the cpm drivers

2007-11-26 Thread Vitaly Bordug
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 10:24:46 -0600 Scott Wood wrote: On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 12:51:21AM +0300, Vitaly Bordug wrote: Even that might be not enough - we may have simultaneous call of this func in non-smp case... Do you really think that every piece of code that uses spinlocks in the kernel

Re: [RFC/PATCH] powerpc: Move CPM command handling into the cpm drivers

2007-11-26 Thread Scott Wood
Vitaly Bordug wrote: perhaps I was not clear enough. That was a rough idea how to handle the whole thing, not just cpm_cr_cmd. This cpm command is a corner case, but there can be other actions that may confuse CPM being triggered simultaneously or overlapping. What kind of actions did you

RE: Xilinx EDK BSP generation of device trees for microblaze and PowerPC

2007-11-26 Thread Stephen Neuendorffer
I've pushed the current state up to git://git.xilinx.com/gen-mhs-devtree.git for your perusing. Comments below. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grant Likely Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 2:47 PM To: Stephen Neuendorffer; Segher

Please pull powerpc.git merge branch

2007-11-26 Thread Paul Mackerras
Linus, Please do git pull \ git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulus/powerpc.git merge to get another batch of fixes for powerpc, as listed below. Since the pull request I sent last week while you were away, I have added four more commits from Kumar. Thanks, Paul.

Re: dtc: Add valgrind support to testsuite

2007-11-26 Thread Jon Loeliger
So, like, the other day David Gibson mumbled: This patch adds some options to the run_tests.sh script allowing it to run all the testcases under valgrind to check for pointer corruption bugs and memory leaks. Invoking make checkm will run the testsuite with valgrind. It include a mechanism

Re: dtc: Merge refs and labels into single markers list

2007-11-26 Thread Jon Loeliger
So, like, the other day David Gibson mumbled: Currently, every 'data' object, used to represent property values, has two lists of fixup structures - one for labels and one for references. Sometimes we want to look at them separately, but other times we need to consider both types of fixup.

Re: dtc: Flexible tree checking infrastructure (v2)

2007-11-26 Thread Jon Loeliger
So, like, the other day David Gibson mumbled: dtc: Flexible tree checking infrastructure Here, at last, is a substantial start on revising dtc's infrastructure for checking the tree; this is the rework I've been saying was necessary practically since dtc was first release. In the new

[PATCH 0/3][RESEND] fixups for mpc8360 rev. 2.1 erratum #2 (RGMII Timing)

2007-11-26 Thread Kim Phillips
these 3 patches are a resend of patches 2-4 (out of 5) that were originally sent 2007-11-05* (patches 1 and 5 were picked up by Kumar to go through powerpc). Jeff, Leo has acked these, please consider for 2.6.24. Thanks, Kim * http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdevm=119428688804765w=1

[PATCH 1/3][RESEND] phylib: add PHY interface modes for internal delay for tx and rx only

2007-11-26 Thread Kim Phillips
Allow phylib specification of cases where hardware needs to configure PHYs for Internal Delay only on either RX or TX (not both). Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tested-by: Anton Vorontsov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Li Yang [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- include/linux/phy.h |2 ++ 1

[PATCH 2/3][RESEND] phylib: marvell: add support for TX-only and RX-only Internal Delay

2007-11-26 Thread Kim Phillips
Previously, Internal Delay specification implied the delay be applied to both TX and RX. This patch allows for separate TX/RX-only internal delay specification. Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tested-by: Anton Vorontsov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Li Yang [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

[PATCH 3/3][RESEND] ucc_geth: handle passing of RX-only and TX-only internal delay PHY connection type parameters

2007-11-26 Thread Kim Phillips
Extend the RGMII-Internal Delay specification case to include TX-only and RX-only variants. Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tested-by: Anton Vorontsov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Li Yang [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/net/ucc_geth.c | 10 ++ 1 files changed, 10

Re: mmap on PPC removes file refcount?

2007-11-26 Thread Dave Jiang
NM, it was a bad test causing weird behavior on PPC. :( Dave Jiang wrote: It seems the mmap() userland call on PPC causes the kernel to lose the ref count for the mount point. This is what I did on a prpmc2800 board (74xx) with latest powerpc.git tree (but also seem to happen on 8548 as well).

Re: dtc: RFC: Fix some lexical problems with references

2007-11-26 Thread Jon Loeliger
So, like, the other day David Gibson mumbled: The recent change to the lexer to only recognize property and node names in the appropriate context removed a number of lexical warts in our language that would have gotten ugly as we add expression support and so forth. But there's one nasty

Re: mmap on PPC removes file refcount?

2007-11-26 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 15:30 -0700, Dave Jiang wrote: NM, it was a bad test causing weird behavior on PPC. :( Ah good, because I did spend some time looking at the code and didn't see anything wrong :-) Cheers, Ben. ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list

Re: Sequoia EMAC only works if u-boot initializes it?

2007-11-26 Thread Steven A. Falco
With the following 15 patches on top of the DENX git tree, I have both emac ports working: 1) [PATCH 2/2] PowerPC: Fix Sequoia MAL0 and EMAC dts entries. 2) [PATCH] PowerPC: Add RGMII support for Sequoia 440EPx 3) [PATCH] Fix typo in new EMAC driver. 4) PowerPC: Enable NEW EMAC support for

Re: Sequoia EMAC only works if u-boot initializes it?

2007-11-26 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 17:46 -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote: With the following 15 patches on top of the DENX git tree, I have both emac ports working: .../... Good. All of these should go in 2.6.25 (not .24 at this stage though). I suppose DENX will pick them up asap. Cheers, Ben.

Re: [PATCH] e1000: Fix for 32 bits platforms with 64 bits resources

2007-11-26 Thread Kok, Auke
Jeff Garzik wrote: Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: The e1000 driver stores the content of the PCI resources into unsigned long's before ioremapping. This breaks on 32 bits platforms that support 64 bits MMIO resources such as ppc 44x. This fixes it by removing those temporary variables and

Re: [PATCH 2/2] [PPC 44x] enable L2-cache for ALPR, Katmai, Ocotea, and Taishan

2007-11-26 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
BTW... Do you know why we can't just enable HW snoop ? The 440SPe documentation seems to indicate that this is supported by the L2 cache via snooping on the PLB. Cheers, Ben. ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org

Re: [PATCH] ehea: Add kdump support

2007-11-26 Thread Michael Neuling
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Michael Ellerman wrote on 26.11.2007 09:16:28: Solutions that might be better: a) if there are a finite number of handles and we can predict their values, just delete them all in the kdump kernel before the driver loads. Guessing the

PPC upstream kernel ignored DABR bug

2007-11-26 Thread Jan Kratochvil
Hi, this testcase: http://people.redhat.com/jkratoch/dabr-lost.c reproduces a PPC DABR kernel bug. The variable `variable' should not get modified as the thread modifying it should be caught by its DABR: $ ./dabr-lost TID 30914: DABR 0x10012a77 NIP 0x80f6ebb318 TID 30915: DABR

Re: 2.6.24-rc3: High CPU load -- hardware interrupts

2007-11-26 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
Hi, I can confirm this situation. But it seems, that no one takes care of it Elimar -- Excellent day for drinking heavily. Spike the office water cooler;-) signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list

Re: dtc: Flexible tree checking infrastructure (v2)

2007-11-26 Thread David Gibson
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 04:13:32PM -0600, Jon Loeliger wrote: So, like, the other day David Gibson mumbled: dtc: Flexible tree checking infrastructure Here, at last, is a substantial start on revising dtc's infrastructure for checking the tree; this is the rework I've been saying was

Re: dtc: Add valgrind support to testsuite

2007-11-26 Thread David Gibson
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 04:10:39PM -0600, Jon Loeliger wrote: So, like, the other day David Gibson mumbled: This patch adds some options to the run_tests.sh script allowing it to run all the testcases under valgrind to check for pointer corruption bugs and memory leaks. Invoking make

Re: time accounting problem (powerpc only?)

2007-11-26 Thread Tony Breeds
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 05:23:13PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: Contrary to what I claimed later in the thread, my 64-bit powerpc box (quad-core G5) doesn't suffer from this problem. Does anybody have any idea? I don't even know how to debug it further. I'll see if I can grab an appropriate

Re: Booting latest linux kernel(2.6.20) on MPC8548ECDS

2007-11-26 Thread Kumar Gala
On Nov 26, 2007, at 11:54 PM, rajendra prasad wrote: Hi, I am using MPC8548ECDS board from CDS for my telecom application. I am able to build 2.6.10 linux kernel and boot 2.6.10 kernel on MPC8548ECDS board.When I take same configuration file and built successfully but not able to boot on