Re: [PATCH 1/3] MSI driver for Freescale 83xx/85xx/86xx cpu

2008-04-20 Thread Michael Ellerman
> This MSI driver can be used on 83xx/85xx/86xx board. > In this driver, virtual interrupt host and chip were > setup. There are 256 MSI interrupts in this host, Every 32 > MSI interrupts cascaded to one IPIC/MPIC interrupt. > The chip was treated as edge sensitive and some necessary > functions we

RE: [PATCH 1/2] [v3][POWERPC] refactor dcr code

2008-04-20 Thread Stephen Neuendorffer
> > +void dcr_unmap_generic(dcr_host_t host, unsigned int dcr_c) > > +{ > > + if (host.type == NATIVE) > > + dcr_unmap_native(host.host.native, dcr_c); > > + else > > + dcr_unmap_mmio(host.host.mmio, dcr_c); > > What happens if host.type == INVALID? Same question for the

Re: [PATCH 2.6.26?] Raise the upper limit of NR_CPUS.

2008-04-20 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 15:33 +1000, Tony Breeds wrote: > As the pacas are statically initialised increasing NR_CPUS beyond 128, > means that any additional pacas will be empty ... which is bad. > > This patch adds the required functionality to fill in any excess pacas > at runtime. > > Signed-of

Re: [PATCH 2.6.26?] Raise the upper limit of NR_CPUS.

2008-04-20 Thread Tony Breeds
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 08:33:44PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > What happens on non prom-init platforms? Um yeah they wont work. I'll try a slightly different approach. Yours Tony linux.conf.auhttp://www.marchsouth.org/ Jan 19 - 24 2009 The Australian Linux Technical Conferen

Re: UartLite

2008-04-20 Thread Grant Likely
BTW, you should really be asking these questions on the linuxppc mailing list On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 2:23 PM, David H. Lynch Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been looking more and more at the kernel uartlite driver. > Somewhere along the line while I was not watching PK's driver has > de

Re: [RFC fs_enet: Convert MII bitbang driver to use GPIO lib

2008-04-20 Thread Grant Likely
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Laurent Pinchart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This patch converts the MII bitband driver to use GPIO lib for GPIO access. > The driver can now handle MDC and MDIO on different GPIO banks. > > The patch depends on Anton Vorontsov GPIO lib support scheduled for 2.6.

Re: pci issue - wrong detection of pci ressources

2008-04-20 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> Yes you're right. Early at the pci initialization are errors of the > allocation for pi ressources. > And that are exactly the ressources failing later, so that pci initialization > seem to be the reason for my problem. > Was there any simple solution (e.g. just somehow increase memory reserve

Re: pci issue - wrong detection of pci ressources

2008-04-20 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Johan Borkhuis wrote: Hello Christian, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: Hi, I tried to use a radeon r200 based graphic card on a sequoia ppc (440epx) board. I wondered about the initialization of radeonfb that failed with __ioremap(): phys addr 0x0 is RAM lr c029cf80 radeonfb (:00:0a.0)

[PATCH] ptrace: compat_ptrace_request siginfo

2008-04-20 Thread Roland McGrath
I posted this before, but I hope it can go in now. It's a prerequisite for some x86 ptrace cleanups I'd like to submit. For powerpc, it requires this patch that's in Paul's queue: commit 9c0c44dbd9bc380bee53e2f768c4ad5410b8aae2 Author: Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Da

Re: removal of arch/ppc in 2.6.27?

2008-04-20 Thread Marvin
Hi Paul, On Sunday 20 April 2008 14:27:27 Paul Mackerras wrote: > Marvin writes: > > will this be the end of life for all the PReP's ? I remember a patch > > posted some month ago, but didn't heard anything since then. Any news? Or > > just let it die quietly? > > No, I'm still planning on gettin

Re: removal of arch/ppc in 2.6.27?

2008-04-20 Thread Gabriel Paubert
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 10:27:27PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Marvin writes: > > > will this be the end of life for all the PReP's ? I remember a patch posted > > some month ago, but didn't heard anything since then. Any news? Or just let > > it die quietly? > > No, I'm still planning on ge

Re: removal of arch/ppc in 2.6.27?

2008-04-20 Thread Paul Mackerras
Marvin writes: > will this be the end of life for all the PReP's ? I remember a patch posted > some month ago, but didn't heard anything since then. Any news? Or just let > it die quietly? No, I'm still planning on getting PReP support over to arch/powerpc, but getting time to work on it has be

Re: removal of arch/ppc in 2.6.27?

2008-04-20 Thread Marvin
Hi, On Saturday 19 April 2008 17:30:10 Kumar Gala wrote: > This is intended as a reminder that we plan on getting rid of arch/ppc > this summer. I'm guessing based on kernel release times that will be > 2.6.27. That would mean 2.6.26 will be the last kernel to support > arch/ppc. > > If people h

Please pull powerpc.git master branch

2008-04-20 Thread Paul Mackerras
Linus, Please do: git pull \ git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulus/powerpc.git master to get a powerpc update. Thanks, Paul. Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt |2 Documentation/powerpc/booting-without-of.txt | 622 +- Documentation/powerpc

Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC KVM] Kconfig fixes

2008-04-20 Thread Avi Kivity
Hollis Blanchard wrote: 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) arch/powerpc/kvm/Kconfig | 11 +-- Don't allow building as a module (asm-offsets dependencies). Also, automatically select KVM_BOOKE_HOST until we better separate the guest and host layers. Applied, thanks.