Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: Refactor device bindings

2008-09-21 Thread Trent Piepho
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008, Kumar Gala wrote: Moved Freescale SoC related bindings out of booting-without-of.txt and into their own files. Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala galak at kernel.crashing.org --- We need to resolve some conflicts in cpm.txt and qe.txt but that will be a followup patch. - k

[PATCH] arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/pic.c: move of_node_put

2008-09-21 Thread Julia Lawall
From: Julia Lawall [EMAIL PROTECTED] It seems better to dereference master before decrementing the reference count rather than afterwards. The problem was found using the following semantic match: (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/) // smpl @r exists@ expression n,E; identifier fld; iterator

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: gpio driver for mpc831x/834x/837x with OF bindings

2008-09-21 Thread Peter Korsgaard
Kumar == Kumar Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpc83xx_gpio.c Kumar So we need to make this mpc8xxx_gpio.c 83xx, 8610, 85xx all have the Kumar same GPIO hw. Ok. I'm not really familiar with the other 8xxx SoCs, but from looking at the reference

Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc: implement support for MPC8349-compatible SOC GPIOs

2008-09-21 Thread Peter Korsgaard
Kumar == Kumar Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, Kumar This way the compatiable binding in the code just lists something like Kumar fsl,mpc8349-gpio, fsl,mpc8610-gpio, fsl,mpc8572-gpio. Kumar Does that make sense? Yes, sounds fine - I'll adapt the patch and resend. -- Bye, Peter

[PATCH v2] powerpc: gpio driver for mpc8349/8572/8610 and compatible

2008-09-21 Thread Peter Korsgaard
Structured similar to the existing QE GPIO support. Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Changes since v1: Incorporated feedback from Anton and Kumar: - Core is also used on 8572/8610 so s/83xx/8xxx/ - Use fsl,mpc8572-gpio / fsl,mpc8610-gpio for 85xx/86xx as compatible - Use

solution to printk() blocking interrupts?

2008-09-21 Thread Jon Smirl
Does anyone have a solution to the problem of printk() to a serial console blocking interrupts for too long? I'm losing interrupts I need because my hardware is getting overrun. -- Jon Smirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list

Re: solution to printk() blocking interrupts?

2008-09-21 Thread Jon Smirl
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Jon Smirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone have a solution to the problem of printk() to a serial console blocking interrupts for too long? I'm losing interrupts I need because my hardware is getting overrun. netconsole is not an option on mpc5200

Re: solution to printk() blocking interrupts?

2008-09-21 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. Jon Smirl wrote: On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Jon Smirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone have a solution to the problem of printk() to a serial console blocking interrupts for too long? I'm losing interrupts I need because my hardware is getting overrun. netconsole is

Re: solution to printk() blocking interrupts?

2008-09-21 Thread Jon Smirl
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Sergei Shtylyov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Implementing the poll_controller() method in the network driver is usually staightforward. Good tip, the simple implementation worked. What controls this? carrier detect appears untrustworthy, waiting 4 seconds Get that

Re: [PATCH] arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/pic.c: move of_node_put

2008-09-21 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 13:01 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: From: Julia Lawall [EMAIL PROTECTED] It seems better to dereference master before decrementing the reference count rather than afterwards. The problem was found using the following semantic match:

Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc: gpio driver for mpc8349/8572/8610 and compatible

2008-09-21 Thread Kumar Gala
On Sep 21, 2008, at 2:46 PM, Peter Korsgaard wrote: +GPIO controllers on MPC8xxx SoCs + +Every GPIO controller node must have #gpio-cells property defined, +this information will be used to translate gpio-specifiers. + Can we add a comment about this being the non-QE/CPM/GUTs GPIO support.

Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc: gpio driver for mpc8349/8572/8610 and compatible

2008-09-21 Thread Kumar Gala
On Sep 21, 2008, at 2:46 PM, Peter Korsgaard wrote: Structured similar to the existing QE GPIO support. Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Also, any plans to follow this up with .dts updates to add the GPIO block into the various files we have? - k

[PATCH] powerpc: iSeries: remove unused variable in viodasd.c

2008-09-21 Thread Johann Felix Soden
From: Johann Felix Soden [EMAIL PROTECTED] The variable statindex in send_request is never read, so remove it. Signed-off-by: Johann Felix Soden [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: Stephen Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/block/viodasd.c |3 --- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Re: solution to printk() blocking interrupts?

2008-09-21 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 19:34 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote: On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Sergei Shtylyov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Implementing the poll_controller() method in the network driver is usually staightforward. Good tip, the simple implementation worked. What controls this?

Re: ioremap and vmalloc

2008-09-21 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 18:45 +0200, Sébastien Chrétien wrote: if I write : ioremap(0x2000,0x4) and ioremap(0x2000,0x5) Will it crash ? To give you a rough idea, unless you tweak things like TASK_SIZE, KERNELBASE, CONFIG_LOWMEM_SIZE, etc... and depending on what CPU you use,

Re: mpc8541 pci1 ioport allocation address space problem

2008-09-21 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 19:16 +0800, Wang Jian wrote: Hi, Here I have a 8541 dev board, with 2 e1000 attached to pci0 and a homebrewed addon board inserted into pci1. I am trying to make it work under 2.6.26-rc8 (2.6.26 broken so I am working at rc8). The ioports allocation reads $ cat