On Sep 2, 2009, at 12:48 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 20:48 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
Switch to using the Power ISA defined PTE format when we have a 64-
bit
PTE. This makes the code handling between fsl-booke and book3e-64
similiar for TLB faults.
Additionally
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Ankita Garg wrote:
With the patch,
# cat /proc/cmdline
root=/dev/sda6 numa=fake=2G,4G,,6G,8G,10G,12G,14G,16G
# cat /sys/devices/system/node/node0/cpulist
0-3
# cat /sys/devices/system/node/node1/cpulist
Oh! interesting.. cpuless nodes :) I think
Hi,
Below is a patch to fix a couple of issues with fake numa node creation
on ppc:
1) Presently, fake nodes could be created such that real numa node
boundaries are not respected. So a node could have lmbs that belong to
different real nodes.
2) The cpu association is broken. On a JS22 blade
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Since I'm pretty sure there could be CPU less nodes just like there
could be memory-less nodes, it would be good if fake numa could
simulate them too :-)
You don't want to simulate cpu less nodes since they do have affinity to
ranges of
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 17:06 -0500, Brian King wrote:
The SLB can change sizes across a live migration, which was not
being handled, resulting in possible machine crashes during
migration if migrating to a machine which has a smaller max SLB
size than the source machine. Fix this by first
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Ankita Garg wrote:
Hi,
Below is a patch to fix a couple of issues with fake numa node creation
on ppc:
1) Presently, fake nodes could be created such that real numa node
boundaries are not respected. So a node could have lmbs that belong to
different real nodes.
Hi David,
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 11:37:05PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Ankita Garg wrote:
Hi,
Below is a patch to fix a couple of issues with fake numa node creation
on ppc:
1) Presently, fake nodes could be created such that real numa node
boundaries are
Hi everyone~
In ther linux kernel code, I found the reloc_offset.
{{{
// file : misc.S
/* Returns (address we are running at) - (address we were linked at)
* for use before the text and data are mapped to KERNELBASE.
*/
_GLOBAL(reloc_offset)
}}}
I couldn't understand the comment saying
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 23:03 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Since I'm pretty sure there could be CPU less nodes just like there
could be memory-less nodes, it would be good if fake numa could
simulate them too :-)
You don't want to
Hi John,
on my mpc512x custom board I have non-working USB after the kexec
syscall. I've traced it down to the ehci_turn_off_all_ports() which is
called from within ehci_shutdown(). If I omit ehci_turn_off_all_ports()
it works fine. The content of the portstatus register is the same after
the
Usually u-boot sends a phy request in its network init routine. An uboot
without network support doesn't do it and I endup without working
network. I still can switch between 10/100Mbit (according to the LED on
the hub and phy registers) but I can't send or receive any data.
At this point I'm not
Hello Vitaly,
From: Heiko Schocher h...@denx.de
[POWERPC] WDT: added support for the WDT Chain driver.
This new driver implements a character device with major number 10
and minor number 130. It is a software abstraction of the hardware
watchdog with two different APIs. While
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:shemmin...@vyatta.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 5:49 PM
To: John Linn
Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org;
da...@davemloft.net; jgar...@pobox.com; John
Linn; grant.lik...@secretlab.ca; Josh Boyer; John
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Ankita Garg wrote:
Currently, the behavior of fake numa is not so on x86 as well? Below is
a sample output from a single node x86 system booted with numa=fake=8:
# cat node0/cpulist
# cat node1/cpulist
...
# cat node6/cpulist
# cat node7/cpulist
0-7
On Wed 2009-09-02 07:33:31, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 15:30 +0530, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
Hi,
This is the version 2 of the patch series to provide a cpu-offline framework
that enables the administrators choose the state the offline CPU must be put
into when multiple
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 1:06 AM, David Rientjesrient...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Ankita Garg wrote:
Currently, the behavior of fake numa is not so on x86 as well? Below is
a sample output from a single node x86 system booted with numa=fake=8:
# cat node0/cpulist
# cat
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Balbir Singh wrote:
Right, I'm proposing an alternate mapping scheme (which we've used for
years) for both platforms such that a cpu is bound (and is set in
cpumask_of_node()) to each fake node with which it has physical affinity.
That is the only way for zonelist
Hi Chris,
I am having a problem similar to what you described in this discussion.
We are using the ppc arch with 2.6.24 with CONFIG_SEQUOIA with compiles
arch/ppc/kernel/head_44x.c (quite different
from /arch/powerpc/kernel/head_32.S). I would like to apply your
backporting patch to this
The former is no longer really accurate with the swiotlb case now
a possibility. I also move it into dma-mapping.h - it no longer
needs to be in dma.c, and there are about to be some more accessors
that should all end up in the same place.
Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce bec...@kernel.crashing.org
Sometimes this is used to hold a simple offset, and sometimes
it is used to hold a pointer. This patch changes it to a union containing
void * and dma_addr_t. get/set accessors are also provided, because it was
getting a bit ugly to get to the actual data.
Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce
Hello,
I have a question regarding reading PCI bus registers from a user space
application running on a PPC SBC. Seeing as though the PCI bus is little endian
and PPC is big endian is it typical that one must perform a byte swap on all 16
and 32 bit register reads?
I've found this is true
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Eddie Dawydiuked...@embeddedarm.com wrote:
Hello,
I have a question regarding reading PCI bus registers from a user space
application running on a PPC SBC. Seeing as though the PCI bus is little
endian and PPC is big endian is it typical that one must perform a
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 15:33 +0900, HongWoo Lee wrote:
Hi everyone~
In ther linux kernel code, I found the reloc_offset.
{{{
// file : misc.S
/* Returns (address we are running at) - (address we were linked at)
* for use before the text and data are mapped to KERNELBASE.
*/
Hi Tjernlund,
Thanks a lot for the reply.
I checked in my code regarding to the invalidate/flushing of the
data cache. In the fec_init its been done by calling the sequence
/* Make it uncached.
*/
pte = va_to_pte(mem_addr);
pte_val(*pte) |= _PAGE_NO_CACHE;
* Peter Zijlstra a.p.zijls...@chello.nl [2009-09-02 07:42:24]:
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 17:08 +0530, Arun R Bharadwaj wrote:
* Arun R Bharadwaj a...@linux.vnet.ibm.com [2009-09-01 17:07:04]:
Cleanup drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
Cpuidle maintains a pm_idle_old void pointer because,
25 matches
Mail list logo
