Re: [PATCH] powerpc: mpc8xxx_gpio: Add ability to mask off unused GPIO pins

2009-12-05 Thread Anton Vorontsov
Hi Peter, On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 01:43:40PM -0600, Peter Tyser wrote: This change resolves 2 issues: - Different chips have a different number of GPIO pins per controller. For example, the MPC8347 has 32, the P2020 16, and the mpc8572 8. Previously, the mpc8xxx_gpio driver assumed every

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: mpc8xxx_gpio: Add ability to mask off unused GPIO pins

2009-12-05 Thread Peter Tyser
Hi Anton, Thanks for the feedback. On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 01:43:40PM -0600, Peter Tyser wrote: This change resolves 2 issues: - Different chips have a different number of GPIO pins per controller. For example, the MPC8347 has 32, the P2020 16, and the mpc8572 8. Previously, the

Re: [PATCH] Signed-off-by: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca

2009-12-05 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 14:20 -0700, Grant Likely wrote: From: Asier Llano Palacios asierll...@gmail.com net/mpc5200: Fix locking on fec_mpc52xx driver Fix the locking scheme on the fec_mpc52xx driver. This device can receive IRQs from three sources; the FEC itself, the tx DMA, and the rx

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: mpc8xxx_gpio: Add ability to mask off unused GPIO pins

2009-12-05 Thread Anton Vorontsov
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 01:32:32PM -0600, Peter Tyser wrote: [...] Adding a new fsl,gpio-mask device tree property allows a dts file to accurately describe what GPIO pins are available for use on a given board. I don't see any real usage for this. If device tree specifies a wrong

Re: using different format for hugetlbfs

2009-12-05 Thread Kumar Gala
On Dec 4, 2009, at 3:25 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 08:09 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: On Dec 4, 2009, at 2:58 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 01:18 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: Ben, David, If we want to support true 4G/4G split on ppc32 using

Re: [v10 PATCH 2/9]: cpuidle: cleanup drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c

2009-12-05 Thread Arun R Bharadwaj
* Torsten Duwe d...@lst.de [2009-12-04 23:20:00]: On Wednesday 02 December 2009, Arun R Bharadwaj wrote: * Arun R Bharadwaj a...@linux.vnet.ibm.com [2009-12-02 15:24:27]: This patch cleans up drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c Earlier cpuidle assumed pm_idle as the default idle loop. Break that

4th attempt: ZILOG serial console broken in 2.6.32

2009-12-05 Thread Rob Landley
My posts are showing up in the archive... http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2009-October/076727.html http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2009-October/077059.html http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2009-December/078498.html But no replies. Is there somebody

ZILOG serial port broken in 2.6.32

2009-12-05 Thread Rob Landley
Trying again with a few likely-looking cc's from the MAINTAINERS file: Summary: The PMACZILOG serial driver last worked in 2.6.28. It was broken by commit f751928e0ddf54ea4fe5546f35e99efc5b5d9938 by Alan Cox making bits of the tty layer dynamically allocated. The PMACZILOG driver wasn't