Hi Ben,
Can you point to me from where you cloned the tree.
Also, net-next-2.6 tree was building for me.
--
Thanks
Sandeep
-Original Message-
From:
linuxppc-dev-bounces+sandeep.kumar=freescale@lists.ozlabs.o
rg
[mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces+sandeep.kumar=freescale@lists.
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 08:39 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
The later isn't as simple :) I believe the bulk of such code in
entry_32.S.
Yeah but it would be useful for hash I suppose if one really wants to
boot with nobats. Though at least on hash most of the time we have ways
to recover by mean
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 08:32 +0100, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
Peter == Peter Korsgaard jac...@sunsite.dk writes:
Peter struct irq_chip::typename is going away (replaced by name). Use name
if
Peter set instead of typename in show_interrupt to make ease transition.
Comments?
Hi Peter !
Benjamin == Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org writes:
Benjamin On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 08:32 +0100, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
Peter == Peter Korsgaard jac...@sunsite.dk writes:
Peter struct irq_chip::typename is going away (replaced by name). Use name if
Peter set instead of
Hi Grant,
Grant Likely wrote:
Hi Ben, Stephen.
I just prepared my next branch for 2.6.33:
git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6 next
Just for curiosity: I noticed that you keep so far the further patches for the
dedicated spi controller on mpc5200 in the next-spi tree. Any plan when they
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 14:20 +0530, Kumar Gopalpet-B05799 wrote:
Hi Ben,
Can you point to me from where you cloned the tree.
Also, net-next-2.6 tree was building for me.
This is powerpc-next which contains the current Linus stuff plus the
pending powerpc stuff. If that's fixed in net-next
Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote on 09/12/2009 09:56:35:
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 08:39 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
The later isn't as simple :) I believe the bulk of such code in
entry_32.S.
Yeah but it would be useful for hash I suppose if one really wants to
boot
This is powerpc-next which contains the current Linus stuff
plus the pending powerpc stuff. If that's fixed in net-next
then we shall wait for Dave to merge it I suppose.
I din't notice that netpoll wa enabled in your compilation.
This is also not wotking on net-next tree.
Will send out a
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 15:02 +0530, Kumar Gopalpet-B05799 wrote:
I din't notice that netpoll wa enabled in your compilation.
This is also not wotking on net-next tree.
Will send out a patch today in some time.
Ah yes, this is something close to a 6xx_defconfig. Thanks.
Cheers,
Ben.
commit 46ceb60ca80fa07703bc6eb8f4651f900dff5a82 (gianfar: Add
Multiple group Support) introduced the following build error
with CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER=y:
CC ggianfar.o
ggianfar.c: In function 'gfar_netpoll':
ggianfar.c:2653: error: invalid storage class for function 'gfar_interrupt'
From: Anton Vorontsov avoront...@ru.mvista.com
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 13:44:27 +0300
commit 46ceb60ca80fa07703bc6eb8f4651f900dff5a82 (gianfar: Add
Multiple group Support) introduced the following build error
with CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER=y:
...
This patch fixes the issue.
Reported-by:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 2:26 AM, Luotao Fu l...@pengutronix.de wrote:
Hi Grant,
Grant Likely wrote:
Hi Ben, Stephen.
I just prepared my next branch for 2.6.33:
git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6 next
Just for curiosity: I noticed that you keep so far the further patches for the
From: Anton Vorontsov avoront...@ru.mvista.com
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 13:44:27 +0300
commit 46ceb60ca80fa07703bc6eb8f4651f900dff5a82 (gianfar: Add
Multiple group Support) introduced the following build error with
CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER=y:
...
This patch fixes the issue.
Hallo,
I had a discussion with some Freescale support people about the
constant RFIFO Event errors or PATA hard disk crashes when stressing a
board with (very) high loads, in my case even with some additional
traffic from an FPGA (or just the FLASH) via the SCLPC FIFO using the
BestComm.
The
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 12:04:37AM -0500, Sean MacLennan wrote:
Newer revs of the FPGA have a larger SD buffer.
How does that impact the older revisions? You're using a cuImage with Warp,
so the device tree is bundled with that. If you boot a new kernel with this
change to the DTS on a older
Hello Roman,
I would be interested in your opinion, maybe Wolfgang could make some
comments, because he is involved in the U-Boot a lot as well.
Do you have a way to measure performance penalties? I know that stability comes
before performance, still I am wondering as it looks to me that the
I am using MPC 8323E processor and linux-2.6.24 kernel.
I tried to set watchdog timer from user space using ioctl with the case
WDIOC_SETTIMEOUT.
I am getting timeout value as seconds and calculating corresponding modulus
for the WDT.
After that I am setting SWTC of SWCRR and writing service
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 09:40:55 -0500
Josh Boyer jwbo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
How does that impact the older revisions? You're using a cuImage
with Warp, so the device tree is bundled with that. If you boot a
new kernel with this change to the DTS on a older board revision,
will it do bad
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 10:36:45AM -0500, Sean MacLennan wrote:
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 09:40:55 -0500
Josh Boyer jwbo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
How does that impact the older revisions? You're using a cuImage
with Warp, so the device tree is bundled with that. If you boot a
new kernel with
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 20:17:35, Grant Likely wrote:
[...]
spi-cs-high is definitely not a complete solution, but it isn't
actively evil either. Plus it is documented and (presumably) in
active use. so support for it should not be dropped.
Regardless, there needs to be a library function
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 04:56:34PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 01:33 +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
do_div accepts unsigned 64-bit integer type for dividend, signed types
would cause do_div's typecheck fail:
stat-common.c: In function 'needed_space':
Add support for the Nintendo Wii video game console to the powerpc
bootwrapper.
dtbImage.wii is a wrapped image that contains a flat device tree,
an entry point compatible with the Homebrew Channel and BootMii,
and an optional initrd.
Signed-off-by: Albert Herranz albert_herr...@yahoo.es
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 01:54:35AM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
It appears that we wrongly calculate dev_base for type1 config cycles.
The thing is: we shouldn't subtract hose-first_busno because PCI core
sets PCI primary, secondary and subordinate bus numbers, and PCIe
controller actually
Hi all,
I have a (probably dumb) question regarding the access to the MPC5200B's timer
gpio's. I added e.g.
ti...@640 { // General Purpose Timer 4
compatible = fsl,mpc5200b-gpt,fsl,mpc5200-gpt;
reg = 0x640 0x10;
interrupts = 1 13 0;
interrupt-parent =
I would probably remove the bcsr region. this was some cpld I believe on a
reference board. with this dts it'll try to write to some hardware registers
that do not exist or are not mapped to the same area.
-Original Message-
From:
Hi Anton,
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 01:33 +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
do_div accepts unsigned 64-bit integer type for dividend, signed types
would cause do_div's typecheck fail:
stat-common.c: In function 'needed_space':
stat-common.c:50: error: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a
Hi Eric,
I am building the linux kernel V-2.6.27 based on MPC8349miTXGP dts file.
I am still not able to boot the cuImage.
But, I see serial outuput from kernel when I try to boot with kernel
ramdisk dtb file
Still the kernel hangs after Dentry cache hash table entries: 32768 (order:
5, 131072
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 18:46:51 Grant Likely wrote:
[...]
+ ret = of_get_spi_cs_active_state(np, i, astate);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, can't get cs active state of device
+ #%d: %d\n, i, ret);
+
林志平 wrote:
Another question is that I found linux2.6.31 does not support
board mpc8544ds,
It should. What problems do you see?
= bootm 0x100 0x180 0x80
## Booting kernel from Legacy Image at 0100 ...
Image Name: Linux-2.6.31
Image Type: PowerPC Linux
On Dec 8, 2009, at 6:48 PM, Mark Ware wrote:
Port C interrupts can be either falling edge, or either edge.
Other external interrupts are either falling edge or active low.
Signed-Off-By: Mark Ware mw...@elphinstone.net
---
Changed in v2:
- Disallow rising edge only on Port C
On Dec 7, 2009, at 4:54 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
It appears that we wrongly calculate dev_base for type1 config cycles.
The thing is: we shouldn't subtract hose-first_busno because PCI core
sets PCI primary, secondary and subordinate bus numbers, and PCIe
controller actually takes the
On Dec 6, 2009, at 5:32 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior sebast...@breakpoint.cc
---
Documentation/powerpc/dts-bindings/fsl/mpic.txt | 42 +++
1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644
On Nov 17, 2009, at 9:42 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov dbarysh...@gmail.com
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/mcu_mpc8349emitx.c | 11 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Minding reviewing for me.
- k
diff --git
On Nov 16, 2009, at 7:58 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
mpc8349 bears two GPIO controllers. Enable support for them.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov dbarysh...@gmail.com
---
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8349emitx.dts | 18 ++
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 0
On Nov 16, 2009, at 7:58 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
Add OF descriptions of EEPROM, two GPIO extenders and SPD hanging on I2C
on this board.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov dbarysh...@gmail.com
---
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8349emitx.dts | 25 +
1
On Nov 16, 2009, at 2:51 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
Describe all LocalBus chipselects on MPC8349E-MITX board. Also add flash
bindings.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov dbarysh...@gmail.com
---
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8349emitx.dts | 21 -
1 files
On Nov 16, 2009, at 7:58 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov dbarysh...@gmail.com
---
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8349emitx.dts | 18 ++
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
applied to next
- k
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 03:16:37PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Nov 17, 2009, at 9:42 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov dbarysh...@gmail.com
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/mcu_mpc8349emitx.c | 11 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 11:48:41AM +1100, Mark Ware wrote:
Port C interrupts can be either falling edge, or either edge.
Other external interrupts are either falling edge or active low.
Signed-Off-By: Mark Ware mw...@elphinstone.net
Looks correct (checked with 8272 and 8555 specs).
Hey Benjamin,
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 05:52:13PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org
Acked-by: Dominik Brodowski li...@dominikbrodowski.net (for PCMCIA)
Note: In the long run we might want to streamline the hooks for fixing
up
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
+ if ((flow_type != IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH)
+ (flow_type != IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING)) {
I'd place one more tab here.
Or better, align one flow_type with the other.
-Scott
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Hi all,
This is a summary of a discussion we had on #mklinux last night.
On PowerPC, SPARC and Microblaze, most system (non-discoverable)
devices are registered on the of_platform bus. In the rest of the
kernel, the same kind of devices are registered on the platform bus.
The of_platform and
Hi Anton,
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 19:09 +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
I think this should be fixed by this patch:
http://sourceware.org/ml/systemtap/2009-q4/msg00800.html
Can you try it? With this patch I see no new regressions on x86_64.
Yes, that fixes everything. Sorry I didn't see that
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Torsten Fleischer
to-fleisc...@t-online.de wrote:
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 20:17:35, Grant Likely wrote:
[...]
spi-cs-high is definitely not a complete solution, but it isn't
actively evil either. Plus it is documented and (presumably) in
active use. so
Eric,
1. I did try building with MDS configuration.
2. Removed BCSR section
3. Set u-boot environment variable.
The code boots up in the MPC8349 reference platform and not in the custom
board.
Also I am wondering why the cuImage would not give out any serial output
even, whereas I do see serial
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 04:16:43PM +0800, Dave Liu wrote:
current the Rx/Tx FIFO size settings cause problem
when four UEC ethernets work simultaneously.
eg: GETH1, UEM-J15, GETH2, UEC-J5 on 8569MDS board
$ ifconfig eth0 10.193.20.166
$ ifconfig eth1 10.193.20.167
$ ifconfig eth2
From: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 15:06:29 -0700
1) of_platform will be deprecated in preference of the platform bus.
What a shame, it's one of the cleanest driver probing models
in the tree.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing
From: David Miller da...@davemloft.net
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:15:50 -0800 (PST)
From: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 15:06:29 -0700
1) of_platform will be deprecated in preference of the platform bus.
What a shame, it's one of the cleanest driver probing
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 16:15 -0800, David Miller wrote:
From: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 15:06:29 -0700
1) of_platform will be deprecated in preference of the platform bus.
What a shame, it's one of the cleanest driver probing models
in the tree.
It is
Testing and other information for this patch.
1. Kernel version: 2.6.32-rc6
2. Board: AMCC redwood validation board.
3. tests
a. Configured redwood boards PCI-E ports as root ports. And plugged
in 2 HBA sas cards with 8 drives each. XDD and IO
meter tests were ran. No issues
Merge common function between powerpc, sparc and microblaze. Code is
identical for powerpc and microblaze, but adds a lock (and release) of
the devtree_lock on sparc.
Currently untested.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr jeremy.k...@canonical.com
---
v2: update iterator, fix subject, post to arch
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 22:37 +0100, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
Acked-by: Dominik Brodowski li...@dominikbrodowski.net (for PCMCIA)
Note: In the long run we might want to streamline the hooks for fixing
up new devices vs. new busses and make some stuff common between cardbus
and PCI hotplug
Hello Wolfram,
On Wednesday 09 December 2009 15:57:48 Wolfram Sang wrote:
Do you have a way to measure performance penalties?
Yes, I do. I am using an SCLPC test driver derived from a driver
written or posted by Grant Likely named mpc5200-localplus-test. This
gives me some useful output about
53 matches
Mail list logo
