On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 10:55:02AM +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:49:55PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
This extends the emulate_step() function to handle most of the load
and store instructions implemented on current 64-bit server processors.
The aim is to handle all the
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 01:41:59PM +0100, Martyn Welch wrote:
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
O
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup-common.c
b/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup-common.c
index 48f0a00..3d169bb 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup-common.c
+++
It's crashing in macio_pci_add_devices.
And snd-aoa is broken, too.
Right, all macio_driver's are. I have a fix, testing now.
Cheers,
Ben.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Grant patches added an of mach table to struct device_driver. However,
while he changed the macio device code to use that, he left the match
table pointer in struct macio_driver and didn't update drivers to use
the new one, thus breaking the probing.
This completes the change by moving all
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 23:26 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
FYI: i8042 core expects I8042_{KBD|AUX}_IRQ to be integers, however it
is certainly fixable...
Let's not bother.
Cheers,
Ben.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Hi Linus !
Here's a reasonably urgent few bug fixes on top of -rc1. Grant OF stuff had
a few issues that broke pretty much all PowerMacs, so this fixes it, along
with a couple of misc fixes and a MAINTAINERS update.
Cheers,
Ben.
The following changes since commit
Scott Wood wrote:
On 06/01/2010 08:43 AM, Martyn Welch wrote:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_32.S
b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_32.S
index e025e89..861cace 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_32.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_32.S
@@ -1194,12 +1194,13 @@ setup_disp_bat:
#endif
From: Wolfram Sang w.s...@pengutronix.de
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 12:21:10 +0200
- don't free bus-irq (obsoleted by ca816d98170942371535b3e862813b0aba9b7d90)
- don't dispose irqs (should be done in of_mdiobus_register())
- use fec-pointer consistently in transfer()
- use resource_size()
-
Victor reported an oops during boot with 2.6.34 on a POWER6 JS22:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16089
Checking ipr microcode levels
Unable to handle kernel paging request for instruction fetch
Faulting instruction address: 0x322d30312d31302c
...
Oops: Kernel access of bad area,
This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion
of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server
processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions
used in the kernel, plus all of the instructions that appear between
l[wd]arx and st[wd]cx.,
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 12:09:24PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
Please find a new set of patches that have the following changes.
Thanks. There are a couple of minor things still remaining (dangling
put_cpu in arch_unregister_hw_breakpoint, plus I don't think reusing
current-thread.ptrace_bps
On Jun 2, 2010, at 6:29 AM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
This extends the emulate_step() function to handle a large proportion
of the Book I instructions implemented on current 64-bit server
processors. The aim is to handle all the load and store instructions
used in the kernel, plus all of the
The commit 061ca4ad still use the old style to refer to device
node, and cause the following compile error.
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_msi.c: In function 'fsl_of_msi_probe':
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_msi.c:350: error: 'struct of_device' has no member
named 'node'
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 09:59:13PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Instead of instantiating a whole thread_struct on the stack use only the
required parts of it.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org
Tested-by: Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_fpu.h
On 06/02/2010 03:06 AM, Martyn Welch wrote:
I think that's a more fundamental change to CPM early debug than I can
handle right now.
Is IMMRBASE on your board at some address that has a low likelihood of
conflicting when treated as a kernel effective address?
It's at 0x0f00, is seems ok,
On May 24, 2010, at 1:38 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org
We can't just clear the user read permission in book3e pte, because
that will also clear supervisor read permission. This surely isn't
desired. Fix the problem by adding the supervisor
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 04:59:16PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On May 24, 2010, at 1:38 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org
We can't just clear the user read permission in book3e pte, because
that will also clear supervisor read permission. This
Denis:
I have reviewed the change and agree to it. Thanks for catching that.
Carl Love
Denis Kirjanov
dkirja...@hera.k
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 07:45:27AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
Why do we need to have emu support for all of these instructions?
Fair question. This arose in the context of the support for data
breakpoint events in perf_events. Since the data breakpoint facility
on our processors (DABR on
Paul Mackerras wrote:
[snip]
The second alternative -- emulating the lwarx/stwcx and all the
instructions in between -- sounds complicated but turns out to be
pretty straightforward in fact, since the code for each instruction is
pretty small, easy to verify that it's correct, and has little
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 11:10 +1000, Matt Evans wrote:
Paul Mackerras wrote:
[snip]
The second alternative -- emulating the lwarx/stwcx and all the
instructions in between -- sounds complicated but turns out to be
pretty straightforward in fact, since the code for each instruction is
Hi Anton,
We also saw a variation of this problem last week and I have an alternative
patch that I'd prefer over this one. I'll post the patch in a separate
email.
Thanks,
--
Wayne Boyer
IBM - Beaverton, Oregon
LTC S/W Development - eServerIO
(503) 578-5236, T/L 775-5236
On 06/02/2010 04:16
22 matches
Mail list logo
