[PATCH v2 1/4] fsl_rio: fix compile errors

Fixes the following compile problem on E500 platforms: arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c: In function 'fsl_rio_mcheck_exception': arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c:248: error: 'MCSR_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function) Also fixes the compile problem on non-E500 platforms. Signed-off-by: Li

[PATCH v2 2/4] fsl_rio: fix machine check exception for e500mc

The original code only covers e500 v1/v2. Signed-off-by: Li Yang le...@freescale.com --- arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c |3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c index f908ba6..954a754 100644 ---

[PATCH v2 4/4] fsl_rio: fix non-standard HID1 register access

The access to HID1 register is only legitimate for e500 v1/v2 cores. Also fixes magic number. Signed-off-by: Li Yang le...@freescale.com --- arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c |9 ++--- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c

[PATCH v2 3/4] powerpc: add e500 HID1 bit definition

Also make 74xx HID1 definition conditional. Signed-off-by: Li Yang le...@freescale.com --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h |2 ++ arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg_booke.h | 16 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h

Re: [PATCH 1/2] mtd: m25p80: Rework probing/JEDEC code

On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 02:27:12PM +0800, Barry Song wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Anton Vorontsov avoront...@ru.mvista.com wrote: Previosly the driver always tried JEDEC probing, assuming that non-JEDEC chips will return '0'. But truly non-JEDEC chips (like CAT25) won't do

[PATCH] serial: Add missing call to init UCC UART port timeout

From: Chuck Meade ch...@theptrgroup.com The UCC UART driver is missing a call to uart_update_timeout(). Without this call, attempting to close the port after outputting large amounts of data (i.e. using tty and uart buffering) results in long timeouts before the port will actually be shut down.

Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (tmp421) Add nfactor support (2nd attempt)

On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 09:35:56PM +0200, Andre Prendel wrote: On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 03:07:05PM -0400, Jeff Angielski wrote: On 05/20/2010 02:50 PM, Andre Prendel wrote: You made a careless mistake, see below. Please fix this and resend the patch again. Then I added my Acked-by and

How to find macro defination in source code ?

For example, a macro in serial driver 8250.c , SERIAL_PORT_DFNS ,I can't find where it is implement. Is there any solutions to find a macro defination in code ? Thx ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org

Re: How to find macro defination in source code ?

2010/6/18 wilbur.chan wilbur...@gmail.com: For example, a macro in serial driver 8250.c , SERIAL_PORT_DFNS ,I can't find where it is implement. Is there any solutions to find a macro defination in code ? Thx Yes, use the lxr engine [1]. [1] http://lxr.linux.no

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Linux cannot run with 0 cores

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:33:06AM +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote: If we configure with CONFIG_SMP=n or set NR_CPUS less than the number of SMT threads we will set the max cores property to 0 in the ibm,client-architecture-support structure. On new versions of firmware that understand this

Re: Request review of device tree documentation

On 06/15/10 23:52, M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: 4c187013.5000...@firmworks.com Mitch Bradley w...@firmworks.com writes: : Mike Rapoport wrote: : Mitch Bradley wrote: : Mike Rapoport wrote: : Mitch Bradley wrote: : : The second topic is the hypothetical use of OFW as a

Re: How to find macro defination in source code ?

On Sat, 2010-06-19 at 00:47 +0800, wilbur.chan wrote: For example, a macro in serial driver 8250.c , SERIAL_PORT_DFNS ,I can't find where it is implement. It looks to be in 8250.c, so I don't know why you can't find it. Is there any solutions to find a macro defination in code ? # make tags