Re: [RFC PATCH] Kconfig: Enable Kconfig fragments to be used for defconfig

2010-07-18 Thread Grant Likely
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Jamie Lokier wrote: > Daniel Walker wrote: >> > But all the rest is arbitrary and could be part of common shared >> > profiles or the like in defconfig format. >> >> I'm sure most people will want to have a config isolated to their >> specific device. That to me se

Re: [PATCH V4] powerpc/prom: Export device tree physical address via proc

2010-07-18 Thread Matthew McClintock
On Jul 18, 2010, at 7:09 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 10:22 -0600, Grant Likely wrote: >> What is your starting point? Where does the device tree (and >> memreserve list) come from >> that you're passing to kexec? My first impression is that if you have >> to scrub

Re: Re: hi, i have two flashs, but my kernel can only find one , how cani write the dts?

2010-07-18 Thread Grant Likely
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:56 PM, hacklu wrote: > > thanks very much! it works well now~~ > but i found in my system,if i add the 0x prefix it will cause a syntax error Ah, your dts file is in the old version 0 format. You must be on an older kernel, or at least haven't updated your dts file to t

Re: [PATCH V4] powerpc/prom: Export device tree physical address via proc

2010-07-18 Thread Grant Likely
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Matthew McClintock wrote: > On Jul 18, 2010, at 6:41 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: >> On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 00:21 -0600, Grant Likely wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Matthew McClintock >>> wrote: To build a proper flat device tree for kexec

Re: [PATCH V4] powerpc/prom: Export device tree physical address via proc

2010-07-18 Thread Matthew McClintock
On Jul 18, 2010, at 6:41 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 00:21 -0600, Grant Likely wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Matthew McClintock >> wrote: >>> To build a proper flat device tree for kexec we need to know which >>> memreserve region was used for the device

Re: [PATCH V4] powerpc/prom: Export device tree physical address via proc

2010-07-18 Thread Matthew McClintock
On Jul 17, 2010, at 11:41 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Yes. Where would we get a list of memreserve sections? I would say the list of reserves that are not under the control of Linux should be explicitly described in the device tree proper. For instance, if you have a

Re: [PPC64/Power7 - 2.6.35-rc5] Bad relocation warnings while Building a CONFIG_RELOCATABLE kernel with CONFIG_ISERIES enabled

2010-07-18 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 17:05 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: > commit e62cee42e66dcca83aae02748535f62e0f564a0c solved the problem for > 2.6.34-rc6. However some other bad relocation warnings generated against > 2.6.35-rc5 on Power7/ppc64 below: > > MODPOST 2004 modules^M > WARNING: 2 bad relocations^M

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc related)

2010-07-18 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 17:19 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > ERROR: "of_i8042_kbd_irq" [drivers/input/serio/i8042.ko] undefined! > ERROR: "of_i8042_aux_irq" [drivers/input/serio/i8042

Re: [PATCH V4] powerpc/prom: Export device tree physical address via proc

2010-07-18 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 10:22 -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > What is your starting point? Where does the device tree (and > memreserve list) come from > that you're passing to kexec? My first impression is that if you have > to scrub the memreserve list, then the source being used to > obtain the mem

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Remove REDWOOD_[456] config options and conditional code

2010-07-18 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 14:29 +0200, Christian Dietrich wrote: > The config options for REDWOOD_[456] were commented out in the powerpc > Kconfig. The ifdefs referencing this options therefore are dead and all > references to this can be removed (Also dependencies in other KConfig > files). > > Sign

Re: [PATCH V4] powerpc/prom: Export device tree physical address via proc

2010-07-18 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 00:21 -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Matthew McClintock > wrote: > > To build a proper flat device tree for kexec we need to know which > > memreserve region was used for the device tree for the currently > > running kernel, so we can remove it

Re: Badness with the kernel version 2.6.35-rc1-git1 running on P6 box

2010-07-18 Thread David Miller
From: Eric Dumazet Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:20:42 +0200 > Le vendredi 16 juillet 2010 à 11:56 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit : > >> [PATCH] ehea: ehea_get_stats() should use GFP_KERNEL >> >> ehea_get_stats() is called in process context and should use GFP_KERNEL >> allocation instead of GFP_ATOMI

RE: [PATCH v2]460EX on-chip SATA driver

2010-07-18 Thread Rupjyoti Sarmah
Hi Sergei, Thanks for your suggestions. I would look into them and submit a patch for style improvement some time later. Regards, Rup -Original Message- From: Sergei Shtylyov [mailto:sshtyl...@mvista.com] Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2010 9:21 PM To: Rupjyoti Sarmah Cc: linux-...@vger.kerne

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Remove REDWOOD_[456] config options and conditional code

2010-07-18 Thread Artem Bityutskiy
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 10:20 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 02:29:02PM +0200, Christian Dietrich wrote: > >The config options for REDWOOD_[456] were commented out in the powerpc > >Kconfig. The ifdefs referencing this options therefore are dead and all > >references to this can b