Beside the MPC 8360 based board kmeter1 other km83xx boards
from keymile will follow. Therefore the board specific naming
kmeter1 for functions and files were replaced with km83xx.
Additionally some updates were made:
- update defconfig for 2.6.38
- rework flash partitioning in dts file
Hi Jeff,
I am not finding any comments on this.
Could you please ACK this patch so that it can be applied in external list.
--Prabhakar
> -Original Message-
> From: Kushwaha Prabhakar-B32579
> Sent: Monday, March 07, 2011 10:00 AM
> To: linux-...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: jgar...@pobox.com
On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 11:23 -0600, Meador Inge wrote:
> AFAIK, we can't rely on 'set_affinity' always being called. I don't
> think it is called at all when !defined(CONFIG_SMP) and if it was,
> then that would be an error:
>
> /* include/linux/irq.h */
>
> #else /* CONFIG_SMP *
On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 11:23 -0600, Meador Inge wrote:
> I agree. I shouldn't have cached that. We should probably introduce a
> helper function to get the cpuid, though. The:
>
> unsigned int cpu = 0;
>
> if (mpic->flags & MPIC_PRIMARY)
> cpu = hard_smp_process
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Matthew L. Creech wrote:
>
> Yes, it's there. Here's the DTS entry in case anything else sticks out:
>
> usb@23000 {
> compatible = "fsl-usb2-dr";
> reg = <0x23000 0x1000>;
> #addr
TIF_IA32 is set during the execution of a 32-bit system call - so touched on
each compat system call. Is this the actual flag you want? A 32-bit address
space flag is different from TIF_IA32.
--
Sent from my mobile phone. Please pardon any lack of formatting.
Stephen Wilson wrote:
On Thu, Mar
Sorry... I confused them too. It's TS_COMPAT which is problematic.
--
Sent from my mobile phone. Please pardon any lack of formatting.
Stephen Wilson wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 08:38:09AM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10,
2011 at 08:00:32AM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Tue, Mar
On 03/01/2011 09:22 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpic.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpic.h
index e000cce..7e1be12 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpic.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpic.h
@@ -325,6 +325,8 @@ struct mpic
#ifdef CONFIG_PM
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:54:14AM -0500, Stephen Wilson wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 08:38:09AM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 08:00:32AM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 07:31:56PM -0500, Stephen Wilson wrote:
> > > > The only architecture this c
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 08:38:09AM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 08:00:32AM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 07:31:56PM -0500, Stephen Wilson wrote:
> > > The only architecture this change impacts in any significant way is
> > > x86_64.
> > > The principle
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 08:00:32AM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 07:31:56PM -0500, Stephen Wilson wrote:
> >
> > Morally, the question of whether an address lies in a gate vma should be
> > asked
> > with respect to an mm, not a particular task.
> >
> > Practically, droppin
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 08:00:32AM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 07:31:56PM -0500, Stephen Wilson wrote:
> >
> > Morally, the question of whether an address lies in a gate vma should be
> > asked
> > with respect to an mm, not a particular task.
> >
> > Practically, dropping
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 07:31:56PM -0500, Stephen Wilson wrote:
>
> Morally, the question of whether an address lies in a gate vma should be asked
> with respect to an mm, not a particular task.
>
> Practically, dropping the dependency on task_struct will help make current and
> future operations
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 14:01 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 11:19 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > No, the domain stuff is good, we allocate new domains and have a
> > synchronize_sched() between us installing the new ones and freeing the
> > old ones.
>
> Gah, if only..
OK,
The mgcoge board from keymile is now base for some other
similar boards. Therefore the board specific name mgcoge
was renamed to a generic name km82xx. Additionally some
enhancements were made:
- rework partition table in dts file
- add cpm2_pio_c gpio controller in dts file
Hi Wolfram,
> -Original Message-
> From: Wolfram Sang [mailto:w.s...@pengutronix.de]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 2:24 PM
> To: Jain Priyanka-B32167
> Cc: rtc-li...@googlegroups.com; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org;
> a.zu...@towertech.it; p_gortma...@yahoo.com; a...@linux-foundation.o
Hi Priyanka,
> Though register-set looks identical but features were different.
Can you tell what exactly is different?
> And also manufacturer is different.
That does not matter. If you look at ds_type, there are already
different manufacturers. They will be correctly distinguished by
i2c_devi
On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 17:37 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> With some implementations, it is possible that a timer interrupt
> occurs every few seconds on an offline CPU. In this case, just
> re-arm the decrementer and return immediately
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> ---
> a
18 matches
Mail list logo
