Use the #address-cells, #size-cells information to parse the memory/reg info
from device tree.
The format of memory/reg is based on the #address-cells,#size-cells. Currently,
the kexec-tools doesn't use the above values in parsing the memory/reg values.
Hence the kexec cannot handle cases where
> -Original Message-
> From: linuxppc-dev-bounces+priyanka.jain=freescale@lists.ozlabs.org
> [mailto:linuxppc-dev-
> bounces+priyanka.jain=freescale@lists.ozlabs.org] On Behalf Of
> Wolfram Sang
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 2:40 PM
> To: Jain Priyanka-B32167
> Cc: a.zu...@towert
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
seqlock: Don't smp_rmb in seqlock reader spin loop
to the 2.6.33-longterm tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/longterm/longterm-queue-2.6.33.git;a=summary
The filename of the patc
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
seqlock: Don't smp_rmb in seqlock reader spin loop
to the 2.6.32-longterm tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/longterm/longterm-queue-2.6.32.git;a=summary
The filename of the patc
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
seqlock: Don't smp_rmb in seqlock reader spin loop
to the 2.6.39-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
se
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
seqlock: Don't smp_rmb in seqlock reader spin loop
to the 2.6.38-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
se
On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 23:16 +0400, Andrey Gusev wrote:
> 28.05.2011 22:09, Tabi Timur-B04825 пишет:
> > On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 2:55 AM, Andrey Gusev wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >> A kernel 2.6.39 doesn't boot on my POWER MAC G4. A kernel 2.6.38.6 with
> >> almost the same config boots without any problems
* Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> But face it, you can argue until you're blue in the face,
That is not a technical argument though - and i considered and
answered every valid technical argument made by you and Thomas.
You were either not able to or not willing to counter them.
> [...] but both tglx
28.05.2011 22:09, Tabi Timur-B04825 пишет:
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 2:55 AM, Andrey Gusev wrote:
Hi!
A kernel 2.6.39 doesn't boot on my POWER MAC G4. A kernel 2.6.38.6 with
almost the same config boots without any problems.
Have you tried using git-bisect to isolate the commit that breaks?
F
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Thomas De Schampheleire
wrote:
> Although I realize that what I need to achieve is unconventional, what
> is the correct way of mapping a certain address range into memory, and
> be able to execute from it?
Have you tried looking at the actual TLB entry for this
28.05.2011 22:09, Tabi Timur-B04825 пишет:
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 2:55 AM, Andrey Gusev wrote:
Hi!
A kernel 2.6.39 doesn't boot on my POWER MAC G4. A kernel 2.6.38.6 with
almost the same config boots without any problems.
Have you tried using git-bisect to isolate the commit that breaks?
I
11 matches
Mail list logo
