Re: [RFC PATCH] powerpc: 85xx: Make e500/e500v2 depend on !E500MC

2011-07-28 Thread Scott Wood
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:56:53 + Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote: > On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Baruch Siach wrote: > > CONFIG_E500MC breaks e500/e500v2 systems. It defines L1_CACHE_SHIFT to 6, > > thus > > breaking clear_pages(), probably others too. > > > > Cc: Kumar Gala > > Signed-off-by:

Re: [RFC PATCH] powerpc: 85xx: Make e500/e500v2 depend on !E500MC

2011-07-28 Thread Timur Tabi
wrote: > On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Baruch Siach wrote: >> CONFIG_E500MC breaks e500/e500v2 systems. It defines L1_CACHE_SHIFT to 6, >> thus >> breaking clear_pages(), probably others too. >> >> Cc: Kumar Gala >> Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach >> --- >> Is this the right approach? > > It

Re: [RFC PATCH] powerpc: 85xx: Make e500/e500v2 depend on !E500MC

2011-07-28 Thread Tabi Timur-B04825
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Baruch Siach wrote: > CONFIG_E500MC breaks e500/e500v2 systems. It defines L1_CACHE_SHIFT to 6, thus > breaking clear_pages(), probably others too. > > Cc: Kumar Gala > Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach > --- > Is this the right approach? It doesn't work for me. I n

Re: [RFC/PATCH] mm/futex: Fix futex writes on archs with SW tracking of dirty & young

2011-07-28 Thread David Howells
Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Subject: mm: Fix fixup_user_fault() for MMU=n > > In commit 2efaca927 ("mm/futex: fix futex writes on archs with SW > tracking of dirty & young") we forgot about MMU=n. This patch fixes > that. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra Acked-by: David Howells ___