On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:56:53 +
Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Baruch Siach wrote:
> > CONFIG_E500MC breaks e500/e500v2 systems. It defines L1_CACHE_SHIFT to 6,
> > thus
> > breaking clear_pages(), probably others too.
> >
> > Cc: Kumar Gala
> > Signed-off-by:
wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Baruch Siach wrote:
>> CONFIG_E500MC breaks e500/e500v2 systems. It defines L1_CACHE_SHIFT to 6,
>> thus
>> breaking clear_pages(), probably others too.
>>
>> Cc: Kumar Gala
>> Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach
>> ---
>> Is this the right approach?
>
> It
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Baruch Siach wrote:
> CONFIG_E500MC breaks e500/e500v2 systems. It defines L1_CACHE_SHIFT to 6, thus
> breaking clear_pages(), probably others too.
>
> Cc: Kumar Gala
> Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach
> ---
> Is this the right approach?
It doesn't work for me.
I n
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Subject: mm: Fix fixup_user_fault() for MMU=n
>
> In commit 2efaca927 ("mm/futex: fix futex writes on archs with SW
> tracking of dirty & young") we forgot about MMU=n. This patch fixes
> that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra
Acked-by: David Howells
___