Re: [PATCH] ps3-vuart: BUG_ON on null drv before dereferencing it on dev_dbg

On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 11:21 +0100, Colin King wrote: > On the unlikely event that drv is null, the current code will > perform a null pointer dereference with it when printing a dev_dbg > message. Instead, the BUG_ON check on drv should be performed > before we emit the dev_dbg message. > >

Re: [RFC 3/5] powerpc: atomic: implement atomic{,64}_{add,sub}_return_* variants

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 04:39:21PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:16:02PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote: > > Ah.. just read through the thread you mentioned, I might misunderstand > > you, probably because I didn't understand RCpc well.. > > > > You are saying that in a

Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] perf,kvm/powerpc: Add kvm_perf.h for powerpc

(cc'ing Michael Ellerman with this reply) Hi Arnaldo, On 09/01/2015 01:43 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: Em Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 12:18:00PM +0530, Hemant Kumar escreveu: To analyze the exit events with perf, we need to export the related tracepoints through kvm_perf.h. kvm_perf.h is to

Re: [Question] Is little endian supported on all the platforms?

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 02:12:54PM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote: > > > or like this, to be consistent with the other *_CPU configs in > Kconfig.cputype : > > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/ps3/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/ps3/Kconfig > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ > config PPC_PS3 > bool

Re: powerpc: Add user-return-notifier support

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 08:35:17PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Tue, 2015-25-08 at 05:41:10 UTC, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote: > > Add user return notifier support for powerpc. Similar to x86, this feature > > keys off of the KVM Kconfig. > > Please flesh this out. > > What is it, why

Re: [PATCH V7 1/3] genalloc:support memory-allocation with bytes-alignment to genalloc

On Mon, 2015-08-31 at 16:58 +0800, Zhao Qiang wrote: > Bytes alignment is required to manage some special RAM, > so add gen_pool_first_fit_align to genalloc, > meanwhile add gen_pool_alloc_data to pass data to > gen_pool_first_fit_align(modify gen_pool_alloc as a wrapper) > > Signed-off-by: Zhao

Re: [PATCH] purgatory/arch/ppc64: Reset primary cpu endian to big-endian

[CC linuxppc-dev] On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:51:16PM +1000, Samuel Mendoza-Jonas wrote: > Older big-endian ppc64 kernels don't include the FIXUP_ENDIAN check, > meaning if we kexec from a little-endian kernel the target kernel will > fail to boot. > Returning to big-endian before we enter the

RE: [PATCH V7 1/3] genalloc:support memory-allocation with bytes-alignment to genalloc

On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 10:18AM -0500, Wood Scott-B07421 wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Wood Scott-B07421 > Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 10:18 AM > To: Zhao Qiang-B45475 > Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; > lau...@codeaurora.org; Xie Xiaobo-R63061;

RE: [PATCH V7 2/3] qe_common: add qe_muram_ functions to manage muram

On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 8:34AM +0800, Wood Scott-B07421 wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Wood Scott-B07421 > Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 8:34 AM > To: Zhao Qiang-B45475 > Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; > lau...@codeaurora.org; Xie Xiaobo-R63061;

RE: [PATCH V7 1/3] genalloc:support memory-allocation with bytes-alignment to genalloc

On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 08:38AM +0800, Wood Scott-B07421 wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Wood Scott-B07421 > Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 8:30 AM > To: Zhao Qiang-B45475 > Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; > lau...@codeaurora.org; Xie Xiaobo-R63061;

Re: [PATCH V7 1/3] genalloc:support memory-allocation with bytes-alignment to genalloc

On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 21:10 -0500, Zhao Qiang-B45475 wrote: > On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 08:38AM +0800, Wood Scott-B07421 wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Wood Scott-B07421 > > Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 8:30 AM > > To: Zhao Qiang-B45475 > > Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;

RE: [PATCH V7 1/3] genalloc:support memory-allocation with bytes-alignment to genalloc

On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 10:33AM -0500, Wood Scott-B07421 wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Wood Scott-B07421 > Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 10:33 AM > To: Zhao Qiang-B45475 > Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; > lau...@codeaurora.org; Xie

Re: powerpc: Add user-return-notifier support

On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 12:11 +0530, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 08:35:17PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-25-08 at 05:41:10 UTC, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote: > > > Add user return notifier support for powerpc. Similar to x86, this > > > feature

Re: [PATCH V7 1/3] genalloc:support memory-allocation with bytes-alignment to genalloc

On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 21:29 -0500, Zhao Qiang-B45475 wrote: > On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 10:18AM -0500, Wood Scott-B07421 wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Wood Scott-B07421 > > Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 10:18 AM > > To: Zhao Qiang-B45475 > > Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;

RE: [PATCH V7 2/3] qe_common: add qe_muram_ functions to manage muram

On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 10:31AM, Wood Scott-B07421 wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Wood Scott-B07421 > Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 10:31 AM > To: Zhao Qiang-B45475 > Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; > lau...@codeaurora.org; Xie Xiaobo-R63061;

Re: [PATCH V7 1/3] genalloc:support memory-allocation with bytes-alignment to genalloc

On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 22:05 -0500, Zhao Qiang-B45475 wrote: > On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 10:33AM -0500, Wood Scott-B07421 wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: Wood Scott-B07421 > > Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 10:33 AM > > To: Zhao Qiang-B45475 > > Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;

Re: powerpc: Add user-return-notifier support

On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 08:07 +0530, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote: > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 07:03:12PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 12:11 +0530, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 08:35:17PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > > > On Tue,

Re: [PATCH V7 2/3] qe_common: add qe_muram_ functions to manage muram

On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 21:22 -0500, Zhao Qiang-B45475 wrote: > On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 8:34AM +0800, Wood Scott-B07421 wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Wood Scott-B07421 > > Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 8:34 AM > > To: Zhao Qiang-B45475 > > Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;

Re: [PATCH V7 2/3] qe_common: add qe_muram_ functions to manage muram

On Mon, 2015-08-31 at 16:58 +0800, Zhao Qiang wrote: > @@ -187,12 +190,25 @@ static inline int qe_alive_during_sleep(void) > } > > /* we actually use cpm_muram implementation, define this for convenience */ > -#define qe_muram_init cpm_muram_init > -#define qe_muram_alloc cpm_muram_alloc >

[PATCH] powerpc/powernv/pci-ioda: fix 32-bit TCE table init in kdump kernel

When attempting to kdump with the 4.2 kernel, we see for each PCI device: pci 0003:01 : [PE# 000] Assign DMA32 space pci 0003:01 : [PE# 000] Setting up 32-bit TCE table at 0..8000 pci 0003:01 : [PE# 000] Failed to create 32-bit TCE table, err -22 PCI: Domain 0004 has 8

Re: powerpc: Add user-return-notifier support

On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 07:03:12PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 12:11 +0530, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 08:35:17PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > > On Tue, 2015-25-08 at 05:41:10 UTC, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote: > > > > Add user

[PATCH] KVM: ppc: Fix size of the PSPB register

The size of the Problem State Priority Boost Register is only 32 bits, so let's change the type of the corresponding variable accordingly to avoid future trouble. Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1

Re: [PATCH] KVM: ppc: Fix size of the PSPB register

On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 08:24 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote: > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 11:41:18PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: > > The size of the Problem State Priority Boost Register is only > > 32 bits, so let's change the type of the corresponding variable > > accordingly to avoid future trouble. >

Re: [PATCH] KVM: ppc: Fix size of the PSPB register

On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 08:45 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote: > On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 08:25:05AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt > wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 23:41 +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: > > > The size of the Problem State Priority Boost Register is only > > > 32 bits, so let's change the type

Re: [PATCH] KVM: ppc: Fix size of the PSPB register

On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 23:41 +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: > The size of the Problem State Priority Boost Register is only > 32 bits, so let's change the type of the corresponding variable > accordingly to avoid future trouble. It's not future trouble, it's broken today for LE and this should fix it

Re: [PATCH] Fix function keys sequence on USB

Hi! May I ask what's the status of this patch? As far as I can see, it has not been included in the repository yet? On 29/05/15 15:30, Dinar valeev wrote: > From: Dinar Valeev > > Original issue is home and end keys are not functional in grub2. > Later I've found other

Re: [RFC 3/5] powerpc: atomic: implement atomic{,64}_{add,sub}_return_* variants

On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 08:00:27PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 04:39:21PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:16:02PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote: > > > Ah.. just read through the thread you mentioned, I might misunderstand > > > you, probably because I

Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] perf: Add a flags parameter to pmu txn interfaces

Peter Zijlstra [pet...@infradead.org] wrote: | | when looking at this (I almost pressed A for apply) it occurred to me | that we now keep double state, cpuhw->txn_flags and cpuhw->group_flag | are basically the same thing. | | Would not something like the below avoid this duplication? Yes, it

Re: [PATCH] KVM: ppc: Fix size of the PSPB register

On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 11:41:18PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: > The size of the Problem State Priority Boost Register is only > 32 bits, so let's change the type of the corresponding variable > accordingly to avoid future trouble. Since we're already using lwz/stw in the assembly code in

Re: [PATCH] KVM: ppc: Fix size of the PSPB register

On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 08:25:05AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 23:41 +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: > > The size of the Problem State Priority Boost Register is only > > 32 bits, so let's change the type of the corresponding variable > > accordingly to avoid future

[PATCH] ps3-vuart: BUG_ON on null drv before dereferencing it on dev_dbg

From: Colin Ian King On the unlikely event that drv is null, the current code will perform a null pointer dereference with it when printing a dev_dbg message. Instead, the BUG_ON check on drv should be performed before we emit the dev_dbg message. Signed-off-by: Colin

Re: [PATCH] ps3-vuart: BUG_ON on null drv before dereferencing it on dev_dbg

On 01/09/15 11:35, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Colin, > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Colin King wrote: >> On the unlikely event that drv is null, the current code will >> perform a null pointer dereference with it when printing a dev_dbg >> message. Instead,

Re: [PATCH] ps3-vuart: BUG_ON on null drv before dereferencing it on dev_dbg

Hi Colin, On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Colin King wrote: > On the unlikely event that drv is null, the current code will > perform a null pointer dereference with it when printing a dev_dbg > message. Instead, the BUG_ON check on drv should be performed > before we

Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] perf: Add a flags parameter to pmu txn interfaces

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:49:34PM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: I'm ever so sorry I keep going on about this, but.. > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c > index d90893b..b18efe4 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c > +++

Re: [PATCH] ps3-vuart: BUG_ON on null drv before dereferencing it on dev_dbg

Hi Colin, On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Colin Ian King wrote: > On 01/09/15 11:35, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Colin King wrote: >>> On the unlikely event that drv is null, the current code will >>> perform

Re: powerpc: Add user-return-notifier support

On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 10:29:12PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 08:07 +0530, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 07:03:12PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > > > On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 12:11 +0530, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015

RE: [PATCH V7 1/3] genalloc:support memory-allocation with bytes-alignment to genalloc

On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 10:33AM -0500, Wood Scott-B07421 wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Wood Scott-B07421 > Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 11:09 AM > To: Zhao Qiang-B45475 > Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; > lau...@codeaurora.org; Xie

Re: [PATCH V7 1/3] genalloc:support memory-allocation with bytes-alignment to genalloc

On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 22:57 -0500, Zhao Qiang-B45475 wrote: > On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 10:33AM -0500, Wood Scott-B07421 wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Wood Scott-B07421 > > Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 11:09 AM > > To: Zhao Qiang-B45475 > > Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;

Re: [PATCH] Fix function keys sequence on USB

On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: > > Hi! > > May I ask what's the status of this patch? As far as I can see, it has > not been included in the repository yet? Hi, Uhh.. I forgot about this patch, since I run local copy. No the patch is not included. For me it

Re: [PATCH] Fix function keys sequence on USB

On 01/09/15 16:48, Dinar Valeev wrote: > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >> May I ask what's the status of this patch? As far as I can see, it has >> not been included in the repository yet? > Hi, > Uhh.. I forgot about this patch, since I run