On 09/28/2015 08:51 PM, David Ahern wrote:
On 9/28/15 9:16 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
On Mon, 2015-09-28 at 08:31 -0600, David Ahern wrote:
On 9/28/15 7:00 AM, Alexander Yarygin wrote:
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-kvm.c b/tools/perf/builtin-kvm.c
index fc1cffb..ef25fcf 100644
---
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:28:36AM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> From e29a7236122c4d807ec9ebc721b5d7d75c8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu
> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:53:49 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH v2] perf: Fix build break on powerpc due
Hi,
Thanks for the review.
On 09/28/2015 06:30 PM, Alexander Yarygin wrote:
Hemant Kumar writes:
Its better to remove the dependency on uapi/kvm_perf.h to allow dynamic
discovery of kvm events (if its needed). To do this, some extern
variables have been introduced
From e29a7236122c4d807ec9ebc721b5d7d75c8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:53:49 -0400
Subject: [PATCH v2] perf: Fix build break on powerpc due to sample_reg_masks
perf_regs.c does not get built on Powerpc as
On 09/28/2015 07:09 PM, Zhao Qiang wrote:
Bytes alignment is required to manage some special RAM,
so add gen_pool_first_fit_align to genalloc,
meanwhile add gen_pool_alloc_data to pass data to
gen_pool_first_fit_align(modify gen_pool_alloc as a wrapper)
Signed-off-by: Zhao Qiang
On 09/28/2015 07:09 PM, Zhao Qiang wrote:
Add new algo for genalloc, it reserve a specific region of
memory matching the size requirement (no alignment constraint)
Signed-off-by: Zhao Qiang
Reviewed-by: Laura Abbott
On 09/30/2015 01:16 AM, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
On 9/29/15, Raghavendra K T wrote:
On 09/28/2015 10:34 PM, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
On 28.09.2015 [13:44:42 +0300], Denis Kirjanov wrote:
On 9/27/15, Raghavendra K T wrote:
Reviewed-by: Brian King
--
Brian King
Power Linux I/O
IBM Linux Technology Center
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Good catch!
Acked-by: Ian Munsie
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Acked-by: Ian Munsie
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
On Wed, 2015-09-30 at 17:37 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> > + if (unlikely(old_pte & _PAGE_BUSY))
> > + return 0;
> > + /* If PTE permissions don't match, take page fault */
>
> We are already in page fault interrupt path, will it be better
> if we
Hello Timur, thanks again for your review.
On 25.09.2015 04:01, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Alexander Popov wrote:
>> +
>> +for (i = 0; i < lpbfifo.cs_n; i++) {
>> +phys_addr_t cs_start;
>> +phys_addr_t cs_end;
>> +
>> +cs_start = lpbfifo.cs_ranges[i].addr;
>> +cs_end
Em Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 09:09:09PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:28:36AM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> > From e29a7236122c4d807ec9ebc721b5d7d75c8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu
> > Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015
On 07/28/2015 08:38 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 07/27/2015 09:49 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2015-30-06 at 08:20:27 UTC, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>> >> BHRB (Branch History Rolling Buffer) is a rolling buffer. Hence we
>>> >> might end up in a situation where we have read one
On Wed, 2015-09-30 at 14:33 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 07/28/2015 08:38 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> > On 07/27/2015 09:49 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >> > On Tue, 2015-30-06 at 08:20:27 UTC, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> >>> >> BHRB (Branch History Rolling Buffer) is a rolling buffer.
The console ring is always based on the page granularity of Xen.
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini
---
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Jiri Slaby
Cc: David Vrabel
Hey Ben/Michael,
Why does 0xa410 value of DSISR called weird here ? What does this
signify ? Just wondering if we can replace it with a meaningful
macro instead.
arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S
/*
* Hash table stuff
*/
.align 7
do_hash_page:
std r3,_DAR(r1)
On 09/30/2015 07:57 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V
> ---
> arch/powerpc/mm/Makefile| 3 +
> arch/powerpc/mm/hash64_64k.c| 202 +
> arch/powerpc/mm/hash_low_64.S | 380
>
Hi Ingo,
Please consider pulling,
- Arnaldo
The following changes since commit 9c17dbc6eb73bdd8a6aaea1baefd37ff78d86148:
Merge tag 'perf-core-for-mingo' of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux into perf/core
(2015-09-29 09:43:46 +0200)
are available in the git
"Matthew R. Ochs" writes:
>>> The process_sense() routine can perform a read capacity which
>>> can take some time to complete. If an EEH occurs while waiting
>>> on the read capacity, the EEH handler is unable to obtain the
>>> context's mutex in order to put the
>>> Following an adapter reset, the AFU RRQ that resides in host memory
>>> holds stale data. This can lead to a condition where the RRQ interrupt
>>> handler tries to process stale entries and/or endlessly loops due to an
>>> out of sync generation bit.
>>>
>>> To fix, the AFU RRQ in host
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu
The perf_regs.c file does not get built on Powerpc as CONFIG_PERF_REGS
is false. So the weak definition for 'sample_regs_masks' doesn't get
picked up.
Adding perf_regs.o to util/Build unconditionally, exposes a redefinition
error for
Hmm... some comments on this one? like it or not?
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 09:04:27PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>On PowerPC, currently we support different value of PAGE_SIZE and different
>value of IOMMU Page Size.
>
>In case the PAGE_SIZE is 4K and the IOMMU Page Size is 16M, and driver
>asked for
(resending to the list this time, apologies!)
>> I'm not sure I fully understand the flow of this function, but it looks
>> like you set rc=0 regardless of how things actually go: is this ever
>> going to print a return value other than zero?
>
> Correct, this function behaves more like a void
On Wed, 2015-09-30 at 19:19 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-08-14 at 21:51 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-11-08 at 11:23:09 UTC, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > int dlpar_attach_node(struct device_node *dn)
> > > {
> > > int rc;
> > >
> > > - dn->parent =
native_hpte_clear() is called in real mode from two places:
- Early in boot during htab initialisation if firmware assisted dump is
active.
- Late in the kexec path.
In both contexts there is no need to disable interrupts are they are
already disabled. Furthermore, locking around the tlbie() is
On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 07:50 +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
> Hmm... some comments on this one? like it or not?
It sounds like it's fixing a bug, but you don't really say. Have you seen this
fail in the wild?
Which commit introduced the breakage?
cheers
___
Reviewed-by: Matthew R. Ochs
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Reviewed-by: Matthew R. Ochs
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Reviewed-by: Matthew R. Ochs
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
On Fri, 2015-08-14 at 21:51 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-11-08 at 11:23:09 UTC, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > The derive_parent() has similar semantics to what we have in newly
> > introduced
> > of_helpers module. The replacement reduces code base and propagates
> > the actual
> >
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 08:35:08PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Commit 086b91d052eb ("scsi_dh: integrate into the core SCSI code")
> changed CONFIG_SCSI_DH from tristate to bool.
>
> Our defconfigs have CONFIG_SCSI_DH=m, which the kconfig machinery warns
> us is invalid, but instead of
On 09/30/2015 07:57 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> We should not expect pte bit position in asm code. Simply
> by moving part of that to C
I guess this does not depend on the new code changes and can
simply be part of the preparatory patches at the beginning.
33 matches
Mail list logo