Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] powerpc: Detect the presence of big-cores via "ibm, thread-groups"

2018-07-08 Thread Joe Perches
On Sun, 2018-07-08 at 13:03 -0300, Murilo Opsfelder Araujo wrote: > On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 02:35:48PM +0530, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote: > > From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" > > > > On IBM POWER9, the device tree exposes a property array identifed by > > "ibm,thread-groups" which will indicate which

Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] resource: Use list_head to link sibling resource

2018-07-08 Thread Baoquan He
On 07/08/18 at 08:48pm, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 5:59 AM, Baoquan He wrote: > > On 07/05/18 at 01:00am, kbuild test robot wrote: > > > However, I didn't find below branch. And tried to open it in web > > broswer, also failed. > > While this is kinda valid point... > > >

Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] hwmon: ibmpowernv: Add attributes to enable/disable sensor groups

2018-07-08 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 07/06/2018 04:56 AM, Shilpasri G Bhat wrote: On-Chip-Controller(OCC) is an embedded micro-processor in POWER9 chip which measures various system and chip level sensors. These sensors comprises of environmental sensors (like power, temperature, current and voltage) and performance sensors

Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] hwmon: Document the sensor enable attribute

2018-07-08 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 07/06/2018 04:56 AM, Shilpasri G Bhat wrote: Signed-off-by: Shilpasri G Bhat Applied to hwmon-next, after updating the commit description. I also removed the text "This attribute can be used as per-sensor or per-sub-group attribute depending on what is supported by the hardware." from the

Re: [PATCHv6 0/4] Salted build ids via ELF notes

2018-07-08 Thread Masahiro Yamada
2018-07-06 9:49 GMT+09:00 Laura Abbott : > Hi, > > This is v6 of the series to allow unique build ids. v6 is mostly minor > fixups and Acks for this to go through the kbuild tree. Applied to linux-kbuild. Thanks! > Thanks, > Laura > > Laura Abbott (4): > kbuild: Add build salt to the kernel

Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] resource: Use list_head to link sibling resource

2018-07-08 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 5:59 AM, Baoquan He wrote: > On 07/05/18 at 01:00am, kbuild test robot wrote: > However, I didn't find below branch. And tried to open it in web > broswer, also failed. While this is kinda valid point... > Could you help have a look at this? ...isn't obvious that you

Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] powerpc: Detect the presence of big-cores via "ibm, thread-groups"

2018-07-08 Thread Murilo Opsfelder Araujo
On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 02:35:48PM +0530, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote: > From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" > > On IBM POWER9, the device tree exposes a property array identifed by > "ibm,thread-groups" which will indicate which groups of threads share a > particular set of resources. > > As of today we

Re: powerpc: 32BIT vs. 64BIT (PPC32 vs. PPC64)

2018-07-08 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 07/08/2018 04:51 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Randy Dunlap writes: >> Hi, >> >> Is there a good way (or a shortcut) to do something like: > > The best I know of is: > >> $ make ARCH=powerpc O=PPC32 [other_options] allmodconfig >> to get a PPC32/32BIT allmodconfig > > $ echo

Re: powerpc: 32BIT vs. 64BIT (PPC32 vs. PPC64)

2018-07-08 Thread Nicholas Piggin
On Sat, 7 Jul 2018 07:59:49 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 07/07/2018 05:13 AM, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > > On Fri, 6 Jul 2018 21:58:29 -0700 > > Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > >> On 07/06/2018 06:45 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > >>> On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 14:30 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: Clean up dma_set_*mask() hooks

2018-07-08 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 03:20:34PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: >> What are you trying to do? I really don't want to see more users of >> the hooks as they are are a horribly bad idea. > > I really need to fix the ongoing problem we have where, due to funky > integrations, devices suffer some

[RFC PATCH] powerpc/64s: Move ISAv3.0 / POWER9 idle code to powernv C code

2018-07-08 Thread Nicholas Piggin
Reimplement POWER9 idle code in C, in the powernv platform code. Assembly stubs are used to save and restore the stack frame and non-volatile GPRs before going to idle, but these are small and mostly agnostic to microarchitecture implementation details. POWER7/8 code is not converted (yet), but

Re: powerpc: 32BIT vs. 64BIT (PPC32 vs. PPC64)

2018-07-08 Thread Michael Ellerman
Randy Dunlap writes: > Hi, > > Is there a good way (or a shortcut) to do something like: The best I know of is: > $ make ARCH=powerpc O=PPC32 [other_options] allmodconfig > to get a PPC32/32BIT allmodconfig $ echo CONFIG_PPC64=n > allmod.config $ KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG=1 make allmodconfig $ grep

Re: [PATCH 2/3] [v2] m68k: mac: use time64_t in RTC handling

2018-07-08 Thread Finn Thain
On Sun, 8 Jul 2018, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 10:55 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > I don't think anyone so far had a strong preference here, so I went > > with what Mathieu suggested and kept the original Mac behavior, but > > added the WARN_ON(). > > So, is this safe

Re: [PATCH 2/3] [v2] m68k: mac: use time64_t in RTC handling

2018-07-08 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Arnd, Finn, On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 10:55 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 7:26 AM, Finn Thain > wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Jun 2018, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > >> The real-time clock on m68k (and powerpc) mac systems uses an unsigned > >> 32-bit value starting in 1904, which

Re: [PATCHv3 0/4] drivers/base: bugfix for supplier<-consumer ordering in device_kset

2018-07-08 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 6:24 AM, Pingfan Liu wrote: > On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 9:55 PM Pingfan Liu wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 4:47 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> > >> > On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Lukas Wunner wrote: >> > > [cc += Kishon Vijay Abraham] >> > > >> > > On Thu, Jul 05,