This adds tests which will validate architecture page table helpers and
other accessors in their compliance with expected generic MM semantics.
This will help various architectures in validating changes to existing
page table helpers or addition of new ones.
This test covers basic page table entry
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 3:51 PM Alastair D'Silva wrote:
>
> From: Alastair D'Silva
>
> Enable OpenCAPI Storage Class Memory driver on bare metal
>
> Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva
> ---
> arch/powerpc/configs/powernv_defconfig | 4
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/p
Fixes: 0d40f55b9035 ("nvdimm: Add driver for OpenCAPI Storage Class Memory")
Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot
---
ocxl-scm.c |4 ++--
ocxl-scm_internal.c |4 ++--
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/ocxl-scm.c b/drivers/nvdimm/ocxl-scm.
Hi all,
On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 10:56:57 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> WARNING: 2 bad relocations
> c1998a48 R_PPC64_ADDR64_binary__btf_vmlinux_bin_start
> c
On 25/10/19 3:46 pm, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
From: Alastair D'Silva
These functions don't exist, so remove the prototypes for them.
Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva
Indeed, they do not.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan
---
drivers/nvdimm/nd-core.h | 4
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
Hi Alastair,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on char-misc/char-misc-testing]
[cannot apply to v5.4-rc5 next-20191025]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' o
On 06.10.19 10:56, David Hildenbrand wrote:
We currently try to shrink a single zone when removing memory. We use the
zone of the first page of the memory we are removing. If that memmap was
never initialized (e.g., memory was never onlined), we will read garbage
and can trigger kernel BUGs (due
Hi Alastair,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on char-misc/char-misc-testing]
[cannot apply to v5.4-rc5 next-20191025]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' o
Hi Alastair,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on char-misc/char-misc-testing]
[cannot apply to v5.4-rc5 next-20191025]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' o
Hi Alastair,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on char-misc/char-misc-testing]
[also build test WARNING on v5.4-rc5]
[cannot apply to next-20191025]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW
On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 10:21:25AM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Le 27/10/2019 à 01:06, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> >The hand-optimised asm code will pretty likely win handsomely, whatever
> >you do. Especially on cores like the 885 (no branch prediction, single
> >issue, small caches, etc.:
Hi Sergey,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on pci/next]
[also build test ERROR on v5.4-rc4 next-20191025]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to spe
On 2019-10-27, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 2:58 PM Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> >
> > + /* LOOKUP_IN_ROOT treats absolute paths as being relative-to-dirfd.
> > */
> > + if (flags & LOOKUP_IN_ROOT)
> > + while (*s == '/')
> > + s++;
> >
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 2:58 PM Aleksa Sarai wrote:
>
> + /* LOOKUP_IN_ROOT treats absolute paths as being relative-to-dirfd. */
> + if (flags & LOOKUP_IN_ROOT)
> + while (*s == '/')
> + s++;
> +
> /* Figure out the starting path and root (if
Le 27/10/2019 à 01:06, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 08:48:27PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Sat, 26 Oct 2019, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Let's look at the code:
__cvdso_gettimeofday(struct __kernel_old_timeval *tv, struct timezone *tz)
{
const struct vdso_da
15 matches
Mail list logo