Re: [PATCH] arch: pgtable: define MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS where needed

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 03:59:32PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > From: Arnd Bergmann > > Stefan Agner reported a bug when using zsram on 32-bit Arm machines > with RAM above the 4GB address boundary: > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address > pgd =

Re: [PATCH v4] PCI: Unify ECAM constants in native PCI Express drivers

On 20-10-04 19:53:06, Florian Fainelli wrote: Hi Florian, Sorry for taking a long time to get back to you. [...] > This appears to be correct, so: > > Acked-by: Florian Fainelli Thank you! > however, I would have defined a couple of additional helper macros and do: > > idx =

Re: [PATCH net-next 04/12] ibmvnic: Introduce xmit_more support using batched subCRQ hcalls

On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 13:09:59 -0600 Thomas Falcon wrote: > Include support for the xmit_more feature utilizing the > H_SEND_SUB_CRQ_INDIRECT hypervisor call which allows the sending > of multiple subordinate Command Response Queue descriptors in one > hypervisor call via a DMA-mapped buffer. This

Re: [PATCH net-next 01/12] ibmvnic: Ensure that subCRQ entry reads are ordered

On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 13:09:56 -0600 Thomas Falcon wrote: > Ensure that received Subordinate Command-Response Queue > entries are properly read in order by the driver. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Falcon Are you sure this is not a bug fix?

Re: [PATCH net-next 02/12] ibmvnic: Introduce indirect subordinate Command Response Queue buffer

On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 13:09:57 -0600 Thomas Falcon wrote: > This patch introduces the infrastructure to send batched subordinate > Command Response Queue descriptors, which are used by the ibmvnic > driver to send TX frame and RX buffer descriptors. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Falcon > @@ -2957,6

Re: [PATCH v2 05/19] powerpc: interrupt handler wrapper functions

Hi Nicholas, I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on powerpc/next] [also build test WARNING on v5.10-rc3 next-20201113] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented

Re: [PATCH v2 03/19] powerpc: bad_page_fault, do_break get registers from regs

Hi, Quoting Nicholas Piggin : This also moves the 32s DABR match to C. I'm still not happy with that. What about the following instead ? diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S index 8cdc8bcde703..6253c4acb46d 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S

Re: [PATCH] arch: pgtable: define MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS where needed

On 2020-11-13 15:59, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > From: Arnd Bergmann > > Stefan Agner reported a bug when using zsram on 32-bit Arm machines > with RAM above the 4GB address boundary: > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address > pgd = a27bd01c > []

Re: [PATCH kernel v4 2/2] powerpc/dma: Fallback to dma_ops when persistent memory present

On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 12:52:41PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arch_dma_map_page_direct); I've dropped the unused exports and applied the series to dma-mapping-for-next.

[PATCH] powerpc/64s: Fix KVM system reset handling when CONFIG_PPC_PSERIES=y

pseries guest kernels have a FWNMI handler for SRESET and MCE NMIs, which is basically the same as the regular handlers for those interrupts. The system reset FWNMI handler did not have a KVM guest test in it, although it probably should have because the guest can itself run guests. Commit

Re: Error: invalid switch -me200

Le 14/11/2020 à 01:20, Segher Boessenkool a écrit : On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:14:18PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote: Error: invalid switch -me200 Error: unrecognized option -me200 251 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200) += -Wa,-me200 Are those all broken configs, or is Kconfig messed up such that