On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:36:06 +0200, "Gabriel Paubert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 03:07:13PM +0200, Alexander van Heukelum wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:13:06 +1000, "Paul Mackerras" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > said:
>
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:13:06 +1000, "Paul Mackerras" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Alexander van Heukelum writes:
> > Powerpc would pick up an optimized version via this chain: generic fls64
> > ->
> > powerpc __fls --> __ilog2 --> asm (PPC_CNTLZ
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:19:50 +0200, "Alexander van Heukelum"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:51:02 +0200, "Ingo Molnar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > * Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
&g
hose generic bitops changes? Just in case it's
> not obvious from previous discussions: we'll push them upstream via a
> separate pull request, not via usual x86.git changes. They originated
> from x86.git but grew into a more generic improvement for all. They sit
> in x86.g
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:55:12 +1000, "Paul Mackerras" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Ingo Molnar writes:
> >
> > * Alexander van Heukelum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Powerpc (and ppc) have their have some code in their bitops.h which
&g
