Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com writes:
On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 17:41 -0600, Anthony Foiani wrote:
In my original patch [...] I used fsl,sata-max-gen. I thought
Jeff disliked it, so I changed it be more generic -- but maybe I
misread his complaint. (And while his opinions are still
(as a proper patch for
easier tracking).
Best regards,
Anthony Foiani
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
-failure-lockdep-splat-possibly-related-tp75162.html
Same patch successfully tested with 3.9.7. linux-next compiled but
not tested on hardware.
This patch is based off linux-next tag next-20130819
(which is commit 66a01bae29d11916c09f9f5a937cafe7d402e4a5 )
Signed-off-by: Anthony Foiani anthony.foi
tag next-20130819
(which is commit 66a01bae29d11916c09f9f5a937cafe7d402e4a5 )
Signed-off-by: Anthony Foiani anthony.foi...@gmail.com
---
drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c b/drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c
index 19720a0
Bhushan Bharat-R65777 r65...@freescale.com writes:
Anthony, I would prefer if you can send the patch (In case not then
let me know)
Sure, I'll get it sent in a few minutes.
Would you like me to put an Acked-by on it for you?
Best regards,
Anthony Foiani
before it'd be accepted there, I fear.)
Either way, I'll definitely report if it fixes the splat on my 3.9.7
system.
Thanks again!
Best regards,
Anthony Foiani
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo
-coalescing.patch
(or: http://preview.tinyurl.com/mpd4e9h )
Unfortunately, the hang on reboot was not easily repeatable; I'll
report whether it happens in the next few days or not.
Thanks again,
Anthony Foiani
-- 8 --
From 2abb6df770c95eb4103476c70847a78f816fe5e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anthony
greatly
appreciate it.
Thank you for your time!
Best regards,
Anthony Foiani
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
provided excellent support. Apologies if it turns
out that it was all due to a wiring error. :(
Best regards,
Anthony Foiani
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
have demonstrated that there is a problem
with their hardware, they have been gracious about accepting that
result and pursuing it with Freescale if necessary.
Thanks again for your help!
Best regards,
Anthony Foiani
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
hard when you read it. :)
Thanks again for your help. I'll try to get the results of testing
w/o speed limit to you within a day or two.
Best regards,
Anthony Foiani
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org
Shaohui --
Apologies, a minor clarification is needed:
Anthony Foiani t...@scrye.com writes:
Shaohui --
Xie Shaohui-B21989 b21...@freescale.com writes:
If stop NOR write, could the SATA recover and work?
Earlier in my development, I was seeing this error and it would
recover:
ata2
, and a kernel config.
Please let me know if there is any more information that I can
contribute.
Best regards,
Anthony Foiani
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Scott --
Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com writes:
On 05/15/2013 03:12:21 AM, Anthony Foiani wrote:
At this point, /dev/sda is pretty much unusable, and I have to do
at least a reboot to recover. (I don't recall if I had to do a
power cycle at this point, though.)
For whatever it's worth
would be very welcome.
Best regards,
Anthony Foiani
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Anthony Foiani t...@scrye.com writes:
Maybe I need to call ata_set_sata_spd as well. Can I do that before
discovery, or should it be a part of the port_start callback? And
if the latter, shouldn't it be handled within the ata core, instead
of expecting each host driver to do that call?
My
/sata_spd:1.5 Gbps
./ata2/link2/ata_link/link2/hw_sata_spd_limit:1.5 Gbps
./ata2/link2/ata_link/link2/sata_spd_limit:1.5 Gbps
Thanks for any pointers. Patch below.
Thanks again,
Anthony Foiani
(Pardon the extra context, but it seemed the easiest way to show how
this call slotted in between
Apologies for resurrecting a very old thread, but...
On 05/30/2012 02:14 PM, Anthony Foiani wrote:
Maybe someone who knows devtree really well could crank that out in a
few minutes... but I'm not that person. :)
Well, I wasn't last year, but this year I decided that I didn't care.
Took me
coding style,
Huh. I thought I had. I'll double-check.
and submit the patch inline rather than as an attachment (e.g. use git
send-email).
Will see if I can do so. I don't actually have any sort of MTA set up
on this machine, hence these Thunderbirded messages.
Thanks again,
Anthony
Scott --
On 04/30/2013 06:42 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
I just meant that, for whatever boards you would have put this in the
device tree, put it in platform code instead (if the platform file
supports more than one board type, then check the compatible at the
top of the device tree).
I think I
this.
I was hoping that someone might know the correct answer offhand, but
I honestly think that this isn't worth spending too much time on.
(But I do think that Adrian's patch is an improvement over the current
state of affairs.)
Thanks again to everyone that's chimed in.
Best regards,
Anthony
/ unconnected kconfig symbols in the tree. If we
ever do find out more details about the workaround, we can at least
add some comments at the code site.
Thanks again!
Best regards,
Anthony Foiani
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https
Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com writes:
We currently support building one kernel that supports a bunch of
different boards. The hardcoding of this workaround was harmless so
far because it was conditional on a symbol that was never defined,
but now you'll be enabling this workaround on
Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com writes:
CONFIG_MPC831x_RDB doesn't mean that you're running on such a board,
only that the kernel supports those boards. It should be a runtime
test.
Point taken.
If that SATA check is CPU/SOC-based, then it should be easy enough to
test. The cpuinfo for
Li Yang-R58472 r58...@freescale.com writes:
Thanks for bringing [CONFIG_MPC8315_DS] up again. Looks like we do
have a problem here.
My impression is that the simplest fix is Adrian's patch, which simply
keys off CONFIG_MPC831x_RDB. It's not very satisfying, but I'll take
working vs. rare
Greetings.
I was occasionally running into problems at boot time on an
MPC8315-based board (derived from the MPC831xRDB, apparently), using
SATA to talk to an SSD. My vendor suggested that I enable
CONFIG_MPC8315_DS.
That symbol is only found once in the entire kernel codebase:
$ git
be some pain in that transition.
Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
Best regards,
Anthony Foiani
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
27 matches
Mail list logo
