Re: boot/wrap assumes a biarch toolchain?

2007-10-30 Thread Jan Dittmer
Andreas Schwab wrote: > Jan Dittmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Your mail from 2007-10-29 4:39 pm (CET) >> >>>> Your compiler still needs -m32 to generate 32-bit code (or use >>>> --with-cpu=default32 to make that the default). >> See the

Re: boot/wrap assumes a biarch toolchain?

2007-10-30 Thread Jan Dittmer
Andreas Schwab wrote: > Jan Dittmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Your mail from 2007-10-29 4:39 pm (CET) >> >>>> Your compiler still needs -m32 to generate 32-bit code (or use >>>> --with-cpu=default32 to make that the default). >> See the

Re: boot/wrap assumes a biarch toolchain?

2007-10-29 Thread Jan Dittmer
Andreas Schwab wrote: > Jan Dittmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Same error, you write above that a newer compiler version should >> not need -m32 or --with-cpu=default32 any more? > > ??? Where did I say that? Your mail from 2007-10-29 4:39 pm (CET) >&g

Re: boot/wrap assumes a biarch toolchain?

2007-10-29 Thread Jan Dittmer
Andreas Schwab wrote: > Anton Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> One way to make this go away would be to build binutils as biarch: >> >> # configure --target=powerpc-linux --enable-targets=powerpc64-linux ... > > If you configure your toolchain for powerpc64-linux you get a biarch > tool

Re: boot/wrap assumes a biarch toolchain?

2007-10-29 Thread Jan Dittmer
Andreas Schwab wrote: > Jan Dittmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Andreas Schwab wrote: >>> Jan Dittmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> >>>> $ powerpc64-linux-gcc-4.0.4 -v >>>> Using built-in specs. >>>> Target: powe

Re: boot/wrap assumes a biarch toolchain?

2007-10-29 Thread Jan Dittmer
Andreas Schwab wrote: > Jan Dittmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> $ powerpc64-linux-gcc-4.0.4 -v >> Using built-in specs. >> Target: powerpc64-linux >> Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr/cc217 >> --exec-prefix=/usr/cc217/powerpc64 --target=pow

Re: Define termios_1 functions for powerpc, s390, avr32 and frv

2007-09-13 Thread Jan Dittmer
Paul Mackerras wrote: > Commit f629307c857c030d5a3dd777fee37c8bb395e171 introduced uses of > kernel_termios_to_user_termios_1 and user_termios_to_kernel_termios_1 > on all architectures. However, powerpc, s390, avr32 and frv don't > currently define those functions since their termios struct didn'