On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
dbarysh...@gmail.com wrote:
All mpc85xx boards deal with MPIC initialization in more or less the
same way. The only difrerences are some flags (WANTS_RESET,
BROKEN_FRR_NIRQS, SINGLE_DEST_CPU), and some bugs like leaking device
node
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:06, Marc Chidester marcchides...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks like the Rev D version of the 405EX chip without security
will be identified as a 405EXr, based on the values in the cpu_specs
table. For 405EX/405EXr the pvr_mask is 0x0004 with the
pvr_value's as
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:06, Marc Chidester marcchides...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks like the Rev D version of the 405EX chip without security
will be identified as a 405EXr, based on the values in the cpu_specs
table.
Yes, that is the case.
The 405EX Rev D without security PVR matches an old
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 13:24, Josh Boyer jwbo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 11:01:11AM -0500, Lee Nipper wrote:
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:06, Marc Chidester marcchides...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks like the Rev D version of the 405EX chip without security
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 13:22, Josh Boyer jwbo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 12:59:29PM -0500, Lee Nipper wrote:
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:06, Marc Chidester marcchides...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there an algorithm update needed or am I missing something?
Perhaps add more
I have observed an odd behavior in the latest 405EX revision parts (Rev D).
Upon first power up on our custom board,
the 405EX Rev D shows a value of 0x12911470 in the PVR register.
After a reset, the 405EX Rev D shows the correct value of 0x12911475
in the PVR register.
The 405EX Rev C part
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 13:51 -0700, Lee Nipper wrote:
Is ftrace functional with latest kernel on powerpc (32-bit) ?
It appears broken unless I'm missing something.
FWIW, 2.6.29-rc2 powerpc ftrace works with one patch
from Steven Rostedt added in:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git
Is ftrace functional with latest kernel on powerpc (32-bit) ?
I was checking basic functionality using the README steps.
The output of tracing/trace includes the header but nothing more (no trace
lines).
It appears broken unless I'm missing something.
Below is the interaction.
Lee
# mkdir
