Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: enable support for GCC plugins

On 9 Dec 2016 at 13:48, Andrew Donnellan wrote: > >> as for the solutions, the general advice should enable the use of otherwise > >> failing gcc versions instead of forcing updating to new ones (though the > >> latter is advisable for other reasons but not everyone's in the position to > >> do

Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: enable support for GCC plugins

version as a basis and fork/simplify it (even i maintain private forks of the public version). as for the location of c-common.h, upstream gcc moved it under c-family in 2010 after the release of 4.5, so it should be where gcc-common.h expects it and i'm not sure how it ended up at its old location for

Re: [PATCH 0/9] mm: Hardened usercopy

On 10 Jul 2016 at 11:16, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * PaX Team <pagee...@freemail.hu> wrote: > > > On 9 Jul 2016 at 14:27, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > > > > I like the series, but I have one minor nit to pick. The effect of this > > > series is to harde

Re: [PATCH 0/9] mm: Hardened usercopy

On 9 Jul 2016 at 14:27, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Jul 6, 2016 6:25 PM, "Kees Cook" wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > This is a start of the mainline port of PAX_USERCOPY[1]. After I started > > writing tests (now in lkdtm in -next) for Casey's earlier port[2], I > > kept

Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v8 2/4] GCC plugin infrastructure

so in general arch maintainers should test the target tuples used on their arch with all the supported gcc versions (speaking of CC, not HOSTCC/HOSTCXX). cheers, PaX Team ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev