2017-11-30 12:20+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
> On 30/11/2017 10:33, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
> >
> > It was reverted in 785373b4c38719f4af6775845df6be1dfaea120f after which
> > the symptoms disappeared until this series was merged, which contains
> >
> > 369ea8242c0fb5239b4ddf0dc568f694bd244de4
2017-10-02, David Gibson:
> Paolo,
>
> Here's BenH's ack. Again, this is a pretty important fix for us, and
> Paulus is away. Can you take this into the KVM tree please.
Applied to kvm/master, thanks.
(Turns out I'm not on any cc'd list, so the author date might be off.)
2016-10-24 16:39+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
> On 19/10/2016 19:24, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>>> > + if (vcpu->arch.st.msr_val & KVM_MSR_ENABLED)
>>> > + if (kvm_read_guest_cached(vcpu->kvm, >arch.st.stime,
>>> &
2016-10-19 06:20-0400, Pan Xinhui:
> This is to fix some lock holder preemption issues. Some other locks
> implementation do a spin loop before acquiring the lock itself.
> Currently kernel has an interface of bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu). It
> takes the cpu as parameter and return true if the
2016-08-03 13:36+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
> hmi.c functions are unused unless sibling_subcore_state is nonzero, and
> that in turn happens only if KVM is in use. So move the code to
> arch/powerpc/kvm/, putting it under CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_64_HANDLER
> rather than CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64. The
2013-10-17 13:35-0400, Steven Rostedt:
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 12:10:28 +0200
Radim Krčmář rkrc...@redhat.com wrote:
We implemented the optimized branch selection in higher levels of api.
That made static_keys very unintuitive, so this patch introduces another
element to jump_table, carrying
2013-08-25 15:15+0800, Kevin Hao:
We plan to use the jump label in the cpu/mmu feature check on ppc.
This will need to include the jump_label.h in several very basic header
files of ppc which seems to be included by most of the other head
files implicitly or explicitly. But in the current
