From: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Replace the sysdev class and struct sys_device used for power
management in the OMAP's GPIO code with a struct syscore_ops object
which is simpler.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Acked-by: Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com
---
arch/arm/plat-omap
From: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Device suspend/resume infrastructure is used not only by the suspend
and hibernate code in kernel/power, but also by , APM, Xen and the
kexec jump feature. However, commit 40dc166cb5dddbd36aa4ad11c03915ea
(PM / Core: Introduce struct syscore_ops for core
Hi,
The following series of patches fixes bugs related to the introduction
of struct syscore_ops later in this cycle, replaces sysdev suspend/resume
operations in all of the architectures still using them with struct
syscore_ops-based PM callbacks and finally removes the suspend/resume
and
From: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Make some PowerPC architecture's code use struct syscore_ops
objects for power management instead of sysdev classes and sysdevs.
This simplifies the code and reduces the kernel's memory footprint.
It also is necessary for removing sysdevs from the kernel
From: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Replace sysdev classes and struct sys_device objects used for core
power management by Samsung platforms with struct syscore_ops objects
that are simpler.
This generally reduces the code size and the kernel memory footprint.
It also is necessary for removing
From: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Replace sysdev classes and struct sys_device objects used for core
power management by the PXA platform code with struct syscore_ops
objects that are simpler.
This reduces the code size and the kernel memory footprint. It also
is necessary for removing
From: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Since suspend, resume and shutdown operations in struct sysdev_class
and struct sysdev_driver are not used any more, remove them. Also
drop sysdev_suspend(), sysdev_resume() and sysdev_shutdown() used
for executing those operations and modify all
On Monday, February 07, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 10:36:31AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
I'd not be so sure - since it's a bool without an explicit default set
Kconfig will default to disabling it and if anything enabling it is
On Wednesday 21 April 2010, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 18:55 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
--- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
+++
On Sunday 09 August 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Also, approaches such as [1] can make use of this
extended infrastructure instead of putting the CPU to an arbitrary C-state
when it is offlined, thereby providing the system administrator a rope to
hang
himself with should he
On Sunday 08 February 2009, Paul Collins wrote:
Paul Collins p...@burly.ondioline.org writes:
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl writes:
On Wednesday 21 January 2009, Paul Collins wrote:
Got a couple of these on a PowerBook running 2.6.29-rc2 either during
suspend or resume -- it's hard
On Wednesday 21 January 2009, Paul Collins wrote:
Got a couple of these on a PowerBook running 2.6.29-rc2 either during
suspend or resume -- it's hard to tell. (The suspend message is
timestamped in syslog with the time I resumed, so I guess it was
buffered along with the subsequent Badness
On Monday 12 January 2009, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
* Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl [2009-01-11 01:08:19]:
On Friday 02 January 2009, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
Hi,
2.6.28-git4 kernel drops to xmon with kernel expection. Similar kernel
expection was seen next-20081230 and next
On Friday 02 January 2009, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
Hi,
2.6.28-git4 kernel drops to xmon with kernel expection. Similar kernel
expection was seen next-20081230 and next-20081231 and was reported
earlier at http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/31/157
Is this a regression from 2.6.27?
Rafael
On Friday, 17 of October 2008, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Oct 17, 2008, at 1:11 PM, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 10:47 -0700, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
Hi,
I get this following compile error on my ppc box.
Let me know if its a known issue. Otherwise, I can figure out
On Saturday, 16 of February 2008, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
The softlockup is seen from 2.6.25-rc1-git{1,3} and is visible in the
2.6.24-rc2 kernel,
While booting up with the 2.6.25-rc1-git{1,3} and 2.6.25-rc2 kernel(s) on the
powerbox
Can you update the Bugzilla entry at:
On Friday, 14 of December 2007, Johannes Berg wrote:
It can use the new notifier that happens before freezing yes. Johannes,
I think that's pretty much what my old powermac implementation did
(using my private notifier scheme I had there), might be worth reviving
that bit and
On Wednesday, 12 of December 2007, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 13:45 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
I only just noticed a huge regression that was introduced when we moved
PowerPC to the generic APM emulation code instead of our own. I'm in
large part to blame since I
PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
arch/i386/Kconfig|4
arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 14 --
arch/x86_64/Kconfig |3 +++
kernel/power/Kconfig | 18 +++---
4 files changed
]
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Scott Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: David Howells [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Ralf Baechle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Paul Mundt [EMAIL
is delivered to the
windfarm thread needs not be there.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/macintosh/windfarm_core.c | 10 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6-git.orig/drivers
301 - 321 of 321 matches
Mail list logo
