the node id
to be -1. Unfortunately the name of the function can easily suggest that the
allocation is restricted to the given node. In truth, the node is only
preferred, unless __GFP_THISNODE is among the gfp flags.
...
Cc: Robin Holt robinmh...@gmail.com
Acked-by: Robin Holt robinmh...@gmail.com
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:44:07AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 16, 2011, at 10:32 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
David,
The following set of patches have been reviewed by the above parties and
all comments have been integrated. Although the patches stray from the
drivers/net/can
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Robin Holt h...@sgi.com wrote:
Grant,
Earlier, you had asked for a more specific name for the compatible
property of the Freescale flexcan device. I still have not gotten a
more specific answer. Hopefully Marc can give you more details about
commit 6c37e46.
Could you please queue these up for the next appropriate push to Linus'
tree?
Thanks,
Robin Holt
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
powerpc does not have a mach-/clock.h. When testing, I found neither
arm nor powerpc needed the mach/clock.h at all so I removed it.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de
Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com
Cc: U Bhaskar-B22300
Make flexcan driver handle register reads in the appropriate endianess.
This was a basic search and replace and then define some inlines.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de
Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com
Cc: U Bhaskar-B22300
This patch cleans up the documentation of the device-tree binding for
the Flexcan devices on Freescale's PowerPC and ARM cores. Extra
properties are not used by the driver so we are removing them.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de,
Acked
If our CAN device's device tree node has a clock-frequency property,
then use that value for the can devices clock frequency. If not, fall
back to asking the platform/mach code for the clock frequency associated
with the flexcan device.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
Acked-by: Wolfgang
Allow the p1010 processor to select the flexcan network driver.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de,
Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com,
Cc: U Bhaskar-B22300 b22...@freescale.com
Cc: socketcan-c...@lists.berlios.de,
Cc: net
believe we have
agreement on all the other code changes in these patches. Is this change
acceptable as is and if we get a better resolution on the fsl,flexcan
name later, we can update the documentation and driver then?
Thanks,
Robin
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 03:45:49AM -0500, Robin Holt wrote
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 09:13:50AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Robin Holt h...@sgi.com wrote:
Grant,
Earlier, you had asked for a more specific name for the compatible
property of the Freescale flexcan device. I still have not gotten a
more specific
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:53:43AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Robin Holt h...@sgi.com wrote:
+- compatible : Should be fsl,processor-flexcan and fsl,flexcan
Don't do this. fsl,flexcan is far too generic. Be specific to the
soc part number or the ip core
really only reflect
changes in the drivers/net/can tree. I, therefore, believe it is
probably best to route them through David S. Miller's netdev tree.
Wolfgang and Kumar, does that seem correct to you?
Thanks,
Robin Holt
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
powerpc does not have a mach-/clock.h. When testing, I found neither
arm nor powerpc needed the mach/clock.h at all so I removed it.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de
Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com
Cc: U Bhaskar-B22300
Make flexcan driver handle register reads in the appropriate endianess.
This was a basic search and replace and then define some inlines.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de
Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com
Cc: U Bhaskar-B22300
This patch cleans up the documentation of the device-tree binding for
the Flexcan devices on Freescale's PowerPC and ARM cores. Extra
properties are not used by the driver so we are removing them.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de,
To: Wolfgang
On powerpc, the OpenFirmware devices are not matched without specifying
an of_match array. Introduce that array as that is used for matching
on the Freescale P1010 processor.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de
Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger w
If our CAN device's device tree node has a clock-frequency property,
then use that value for the can devices clock frequency. If not, fall
back to asking the platform/mach code for the clock frequency associated
with the flexcan device.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
To: Kumar Gala ga
Allow the p1010 processor to select the flexcan network driver.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de,
Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com,
Cc: U Bhaskar-B22300 b22...@freescale.com
Cc: socketcan-c...@lists.berlios.de,
Cc: net
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:46:27PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 10, 2011, at 1:16 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
On 08/10/2011 07:01 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 10, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
I added a simple clock source for the p1010rdb so the flexcan driver
resolved.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
To: U Bhaskar-B22300 b22...@freescale.com
Cc: PPC list linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Eric Dumazet eric.duma...@gmail.com
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1010si.dtsi
b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1010si.dtsi
index 7f51104..91566aa 100644
really only reflect
changes in the drivers/net/can tree. I, therefore, believe it is
probably best to route them through David S. Miller's netdev tree.
Wolfgang and Kumar, does that seem correct to you?
Thanks,
Robin Holt
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
powerpc does not have a mach-/clock.h. When testing, I found neither
arm nor powerpc needed the mach/clock.h at all so I removed it.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de
Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com
Cc: U Bhaskar-B22300
Make flexcan driver handle register reads in the appropriate endianess.
This was a basic search and replace and then define some inlines.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de
Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com
Cc: U Bhaskar-B22300
This patch cleans up the documentation of the device-tree binding for
the Flexcan devices on Freescale's PowerPC and ARM cores. Extra
properties are not used by the driver so we are removing them.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
To: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de,
To: Wolfgang
On powerpc, the OpenFirmware devices are not matched without specifying
an of_match array. Introduce that array as that is used for matching
on the Freescale P1010 processor.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de
Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger w
If our CAN device's device tree node has a clock-frequency property,
then use that value for the can devices clock frequency. If not, fall
back to asking the platform/mach code for the clock frequency associated
with the flexcan device.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
To: Kumar Gala ga
Allow the p1010 processor to select the flexcan network driver.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de,
Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com,
Cc: U Bhaskar-B22300 b22...@freescale.com
Cc: socketcan-c...@lists.berlios.de,
Cc: net
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 06:35:08PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
On 08/11/2011 06:07 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
Allow the p1010 processor to select the flexcan network driver.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de,
Acked-by: Wolfgang
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:41:34PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 11, 2011, at 11:07 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
Allow the p1010 processor to select the flexcan network driver.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de,
Acked-by: Wolfgang
for segragating future specific
revisions of the flexcan interface if needed.
6) I failed to Cc: you or the device tree list when I submitted version
10 of the patches. I have added both to the patch header so they
will be included in the next pass.
Thanks,
Robin Holt
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:01:58PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
On 08/10/2011 05:05 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
With all the patches applied, my p1010rdb works for communicating between
its two can ports and also can communicate with an external PSOC. I have
done no testing beyond compile
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:56:01AM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
On 08/10/2011 05:06 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/clock.c
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/clock.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..16fae04
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 03:47:43PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hi Robin,
On 08/10/2011 05:06 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
In working with the socketcan developers, we have come to the conclusion
the Documentation...fsl-flexcan.txt device tree documentation needs to
be cleaned up
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 10:06:02PM -0500, Robin Holt wrote:
On powerpc, the OpenFirmware devices are not matched without specifying
an of_match array. Introduce that array as that is used for matching
on the Freescale P1010 processor.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
To: Marc Kleine
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:45:17AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 10, 2011, at 9:15 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 03:47:43PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hi Robin,
On 08/10/2011 05:06 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
In working with the socketcan developers, we have come
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 02:36:20PM +, U Bhaskar-B22300 wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Robin Holt [mailto:h...@sgi.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 7:46 PM
To: Wolfgang Grandegger
Cc: Robin Holt; Marc Kleine-Budde; U Bhaskar-B22300; Wood Scott-B07421;
net
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:52:07AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 9, 2011, at 3:59 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
I guess my poor wording may have gotten me in trouble. I am getting
ready to repost this patch, but I want to ensure I am getting it as
right as possible.
I think I should
correct form.
Thanks,
Robin Holt
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
powerpc does not have a mach-/clock.h. When testing, I found neither
arm nor powerpc needed the mach/clock.h at all so I removed it.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de
Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com
Cc: U Bhaskar-B22300
Make flexcan driver handle register reads in the appropriate endianess.
This was a basic search and replace and then define some inlines.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de
Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com
Cc: U Bhaskar-B22300
On powerpc, the OpenFirmware devices are not matched without specifying
an of_match array. Introduce that array as that is used for matching
on the Freescale P1010 processor.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de
Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger w
I added a simple clock source for the p1010rdb so the flexcan driver
could determine a clock frequency. The p1010 flexcan device only has
an oscillator of system bus frequency divided by 2.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de,
Acked-by: Wolfgang
source can not be selected.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de,
To: Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com,
To: U Bhaskar-B22300 b22...@freescale.com
To: Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com
To: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
To: Kumar Gala ga
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:53:15AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 10, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 02:36:20PM +, U Bhaskar-B22300 wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Robin Holt [mailto:h...@sgi.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 7:46
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:56:28AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On 08/10/2011 11:27 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
-CPI Clock- Can Protocol Interface Clock
- This CLK_SRC bit of CTRL(control register) selects the clock source to
- the CAN Protocol Interface(CPI) to be either the peripheral clock
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:17:45PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 10, 2011, at 12:16 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:53:15AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 10, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 02:36:20PM +, U Bhaskar-B22300 wrote
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:36:22PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On 08/10/2011 12:19 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:56:28AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On 08/10/2011 11:27 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
-CPI Clock- Can Protocol Interface Clock
- This CLK_SRC bit of CTRL(control register
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 01:27:52PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On 08/10/2011 01:23 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
On 08/10/2011 06:00 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 02:36:20PM +, U Bhaskar-B22300 wrote:
...
It looks like the way to do that is to assign a label to those
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 01:40:30PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On 08/10/2011 01:30 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:36:22PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On 08/10/2011 12:19 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:56:28AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
Also may want to list fsl
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 08:16:33PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
On 08/10/2011 07:01 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 10, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
I added a simple clock source for the p1010rdb so the flexcan driver
could determine a clock frequency. The p1010 flexcan
and last patches are both applied,
the tree will compile for either ppc or arm, but will not work without
all patches. If the ppc patch (4/4) gets applied before 1/4, we could
have a random config tester detect a compile failure on ppc if they
select NET, CAN, and CAN_FLEXCAN.
Thanks,
Robin Holt
On powerpc, the OpenFirmware devices are not matched without specifying
an of_match array. Introduce that array as that is used for matching
on the Freescale P1010 processor.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
To: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de
To: Wolfgang Grandegger w
Make flexcan driver handle register reads in the appropriate endianess.
This was a basic search and replace and then define some inlines.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de
To: Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com
To: U Bhaskar-B22300 b22
Argh. I sent an earlier (non-working) version of this patch. Here is
the correct one.
I added a clock source for the p1010rdb so the flexcan driver
could find its clock frequency.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
To: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de,
To: Wolfgang Grandegger w
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 09:11:33AM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
+ return p1010_rdb_system_clock;
Just returning fsl_get_sys_freq() here would already be fine. I'm also
missing the factor of two here:
return fsl_get_sys_freq() / 2;
I am working on the other comments
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 09:11:33AM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
On 08/09/2011 08:33 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
Argh. I sent an earlier (non-working) version of this patch. Here is
the correct one.
Please always resend the complete series of patches with an incremented
version number
and last patches are both applied,
the tree will compile for either ppc or arm, but will not work without
all patches. If the ppc patch (4/4) gets applied before 1/4, we could
have a random config tester detect a compile failure on ppc if they
select NET, CAN, and CAN_FLEXCAN.
Thanks,
Robin Holt
On powerpc, the OpenFirmware devices are not matched without specifying
an of_match array. Introduce that array as that is used for matching
on the Freescale P1010 processor.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
To: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de
To: Wolfgang Grandegger w
powerpc does not have a mach-/clock.h. When testing, I found neither
arm nor powerpc needed the mach/clock.h at all so I removed it.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
To: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de
To: Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com
To: U Bhaskar-B22300 b22
I added a simple clock source for the p1010rdb so the flexcan driver
could determine a clock frequency. The p1010 can device only has an
oscillator of system bus frequency divided by 2.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
To: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de,
To: Wolfgang Grandegger w
Make flexcan driver handle register reads in the appropriate endianess.
This was a basic search and replace and then define some inlines.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de
To: Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com
To: U Bhaskar-B22300 b22
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 02:33:31PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
On 08/09/2011 07:55 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
I added a clock source for the p1010rdb so the flexcan driver
could find its clock frequency.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
To: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de
submission of patch 5.
Thanks,
Robin Holt
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
powerpc does not have a mach-/clock.h. When testing, I found neither
arm nor powerpc needed the mach/clock.h at all so I removed it.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
To: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de
Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com
To: U Bhaskar-B22300 b22
Make flexcan driver handle register reads in the appropriate endianess.
This was a basic search and replace and then define some inlines.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de
Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com
To: U Bhaskar-B22300
On powerpc, the OpenFirmware devices are not matched without specifying
an of_match array. Introduce that array as that is used for matching
on the Freescale P1010 processor.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
To: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de
Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger w
I added a simple clock source for the p1010rdb so the flexcan driver
could determine a clock frequency. The p1010 can device only has an
oscillator of system bus frequency divided by 2.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de,
Acked-by: Wolfgang
the standard for node naming in that they have a trailing -v1.0.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
To: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de,
To: Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com,
To: U Bhaskar-B22300 b22...@freescale.com
Cc: socketcan-c...@lists.berlios.de,
Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 02:45:58PM +, U Bhaskar-B22300 wrote:
Hi Robin,
Where are you doing the irq handling ie request_irq() for the powerpc
based P1010.
Or the existing code of ARM based FlexCAN will work for P1010 ??
It appears that the of_device stuff got moved under the
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 01:17:47PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On 08/09/2011 09:43 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
In working with the socketcan developers, we have come to the conclusion
the fsl-flexcan device tree bindings need to be cleaned up.
The driver does not depend upon any properties other
I guess my poor wording may have gotten me in trouble. I am getting
ready to repost this patch, but I want to ensure I am getting it as
right as possible.
I think I should reword the commit message to indicate we are removing
the Documentation/.../fsl-flexcan.txt file which has essentially
believe they are all ready
for forwarding to David S. Miller for the netdev tree. I think patch
4 is ready for submission to the PPC85xx maintainer. Patch 5 changed
from the previous post by adding a second compatible string for the
fsl,p1010_flexcan.
Thanks,
Robin Holt
powerpc does not have a mach-/clock.h. When testing, I found neither
arm nor powerpc needed the mach/clock.h at all so I removed it.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
To: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de
Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com
To: U Bhaskar-B22300 b22
Make flexcan driver handle register reads in the appropriate endianess.
This was a basic search and replace and then define some inlines.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de
Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com
To: U Bhaskar-B22300
On powerpc, the OpenFirmware devices are not matched without specifying
an of_match array. Introduce that array as that is used for matching
on the Freescale P1010 processor.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
To: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de
Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger w
I added a simple clock source for the p1010rdb so the flexcan driver
could determine a clock frequency. The p1010 can device only has an
oscillator of system bus frequency divided by 2.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de,
Acked-by: Wolfgang
*dts* files are not following the standard for node naming in
that they have a trailing -v1.0.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
To: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de,
To: Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com,
To: U Bhaskar-B22300 b22...@freescale.com
To: Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com
powerpc does not have a mach-/clock.h. When testing, I found neither
arm nor powerpc needed the mach/clock.h at all so I removed it.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
To: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de
To: Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com
To: U Bhaskar-B22300 b22
I added a clock source for the p1010rdb so the flexcan driver
could find its clock frequency.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
To: Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de,
To: Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com,
To: U Bhaskar-B22300 b22...@freescale.com
Cc: socketcan-c
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 11:52:45AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 6, 2011, at 8:58 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
On 08/06/2011 06:05 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
flexcan driver needs the clk_get, clk_get_rate, etc functions
to work. This patch provides the minimum functionality
The root of this issue is in sysfs directory creation. Every time
a directory is created a string compare is done against all sibling
directories to ensure we do not create duplicates. The list of
directory nodes in sysfs is kept as an unsorted list which results
in this being an
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 11:25:00PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
* Nathan Fontenot nf...@austin.ibm.com [2010-10-01 13:35:54]:
Define a version of memory_block_size_bytes() for powerpc/pseries such that
a memory block spans an entire lmb.
I hope I am not missing anything obvious, but why
...@austin.ibm.com
Reviewed-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
I am fine with this patch by itself, but its only real function is
to protect the count introduced by the next patch. You might want to
combine the patches, but if not, that is fine as well.
Robin
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 01:28:39PM -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
Move the find_memory_block() routine up to avoid needing a forward
declaration in subsequent patches.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot nf...@austin.ibm.com
Reviewed-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
removed so we can remove the memory block.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot nf...@austin.ibm.com
Reviewed-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Reviewed-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 01:37:05PM -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
Define a version of memory_block_size_bytes for x86_64 when CONFIG_X86_UV is
set.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
Signed-off-by: Jack Steiner stei...@sgi.com
I think this technically needs a Signed-off-by: you since you
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 01:37:49PM -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
Update the memory hotplug documentation to reflect the new behaviors of
memory blocks reflected in sysfs.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot nf...@austin.ibm.com
Reviewed-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 01:31:51PM -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
Update the memory sysfs code such that each sysfs memory directory is now
considered a memory block that can span multiple memory sections per
memory block. The default size of each memory block is SECTION_SIZE_BITS
to maintain
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 01:35:54PM -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
Define a version of memory_block_size_bytes() for powerpc/pseries such that
a memory block spans an entire lmb.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot nf...@austin.ibm.com
Reviewed-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
parameter to unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes so that we know which memory
section of the memory block to unregister.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot nf...@austin.ibm.com
Reviewed-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev
Fontenot nf...@austin.ibm.com
Reviewed-by: Robin Holt h...@sgi.com
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 02:28:30PM -0500, Robin Holt wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 01:17:33PM -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
...
My next task is to implement a x86_64 SGI UV specific chunk of code
to memory_block_size_bytes(). Would you consider adding that to your
patch set? I expect
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 01:17:33PM -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
On 09/28/2010 07:38 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
I was tasked with looking at a slowdown in similar sized SGI machines
booting x86_64. Jack Steiner had already looked into the memory_dev_init.
I was looking at link_mem_sections
In the next patch, you introduce a mutex for adding/removing memory blocks.
Is there really a need for this to be atomic? If you reorder the patches
so the mutex comes first, would the atomic be needed any longer?
Robin
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 02:22:24PM -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
Add a
I was tasked with looking at a slowdown in similar sized SGI machines
booting x86_64. Jack Steiner had already looked into the memory_dev_init.
I was looking at link_mem_sections().
I made a dramatic improvement on a 16TB machine in that function by
merely caching the most recent memory section
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 02:44:40PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 09/27/2010 09:09 PM, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
This set of patches decouples the concept that a single memory
section corresponds to a single directory in
/sys/devices/system/memory/. On systems
with large amounts of memory (1+ TB)
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 12:50:48PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
Let me start by saying I agree completely with everything you wrote and
still disagree with this patch, but was willing to compromise and work
around this for our upcoming x86_64 machine by putting a value add
into our packaging of
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 11:37:55AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 04:55:07AM -0500, Robin Holt wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 12:50:48PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
Let me start by saying I agree completely with everything you wrote and
still disagree with this patch
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
