Hi Dan vinod,
Do you have any comments about this patch?
Thanks,
Forrest
-Original Message-
From: Shi Xuelin-B29237
Sent: 2012年11月21日 17:01
To: dan.j.willi...@gmail.com; vinod.k...@intel.com;
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: i...@ovro.caltech.edu; Shi
Hi Dan,
Do you have any comments about this RaidEngine patch?
Thanks,
Forrest
-Original Message-
From: Linuxppc-dev
[mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces+qiang.liu=freescale@lists.ozlabs.org] On
Behalf Of Shi Xuelin-B29237
Sent: 2012年8月22日 14:24
To: dan.j.willi...@gmail.com; vinod.k
Hi Dan Williams,
Do you have any comment about this patch?
Thanks,
Forrest
-Original Message-
From: Ira W. Snyder [mailto:i...@ovro.caltech.edu]
Sent: 2012年1月12日 0:14
To: Shi Xuelin-B29237
Cc: vinod.k...@intel.com; dan.j.willi...@intel.com;
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-ker
Hello Dan Williams,
Do you have any comment about this patch?
Thanks,
Forrest
-Original Message-
From: Shi Xuelin-B29237
Sent: 2011年12月27日 14:31
To: vinod.k...@intel.com; dan.j.willi...@intel.com;
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Li Yang-R58472
Cc: Shi
Xuelin-B29237
Sent: 2011年12月26日 14:01
To: i...@ovro.caltech.edu; vinod.k...@intel.com; dan.j.willi...@intel.com;
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Shi Xuelin-B29237
Subject: [PATCH] fsldma: fix performance degradation by optimizing spinlock use.
From: Forrest shi b29
returns, I believe the memory access are completed.
spin_unlock_irqsave is an implicit memory barrier and guaranteed this.
Thanks,
Forrest
-Original Message-
From: Ira W. Snyder [mailto:i...@ovro.caltech.edu]
Sent: 2011年12月3日 1:14
To: Shi Xuelin-B29237
Cc: vinod.k...@intel.com
as
completed, because the fsl_tx_status is called after fsl_dma_tx_submit for a
specific cookie. If you can give me an example here, I will agree with you.
Thanks,
Forrest
-Original Message-
From: Ira W. Snyder [mailto:i...@ovro.caltech.edu]
Sent: 2011年12月1日 1:08
To: Shi Xuelin-B29237
Cc
] fsldma: fix performance degradation by
optimizing spinlock use.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 08:12:25AM +, Shi Xuelin-B29237 wrote:
Hi Ira,
Thanks for your review.
After second thought, I think your scenario may not occur.
Because the cookie 20 we query must be returned
Hi Ira,
see my comments below.
Thanks,
Forrest
-Original Message-
From: Ira W. Snyder [mailto:i...@ovro.caltech.edu]
Sent: 2011年11月29日 0:38
To: Shi Xuelin-B29237
Cc: vinod.k...@intel.com; dan.j.willi...@intel.com;
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Li Yang-R58472; linux-ker
-common.cookie is definitely wrote as
20 and cpu2 could not read as 19.
How do you think?
Happy Thanks Giving day,
Forrest
-Original Message-
From: Ira W. Snyder [mailto:i...@ovro.caltech.edu]
Sent: 2011年11月23日 2:59
To: Shi Xuelin-B29237
Cc: dan.j.willi...@intel.com; Li Yang-R58472; z...@zh
10 matches
Mail list logo
