On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 15:48 -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On 01/11/2016 02:55 PM, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote:
> > "Carlos O'Donell" writes:
> >
> >> On 01/11/2016 10:16 AM, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote:
> >>> Adhemerval Zanella writes:
> >>>
> On 08-01-2016 13:36, Pe
On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 14:59 +0200, David Jander wrote:
> On Thursday 04 September 2008 14:19:26 Josh Boyer wrote:
> >[...]
> > >(I have edited the output of this tool to fit into an e-mail without
> > > wrapping lines for readability).
> > >Please tell me how on earth there can be such a big differ
On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 13:48 +0200, David Jander wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 August 2008 23:04:39 Steven Munroe wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 08:28 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 15:06 +0200, David Jander wrote:
> > > > Hi Matt,
>
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 08:28 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 15:06 +0200, David Jander wrote:
> > Hi Matt,
> >
> > On Monday 25 August 2008 13:00:10 Matt Sealey wrote:
> > > The focus has definitely been on VMX but that's not to say lower power
> > > processors were for
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 10:48 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Adding Steve to the CC list as I'd like his input from the
> glibc/powerpc side as he's the requester of that feature in the first
> place.
>
> Steve: Roland is proposing to ues dsocaps instead of AT_BASE_PLATFORM.
>
I am will to
Roland McGrath writes:
> I understand why you think so. But let's not be too abstract. The
> purpose of the addition is to drive ld.so's selection of libraries, yes?
The is one possible usage of this AT_BASE_PLATFORM. There is also a
requirement from performance tools and large applications to
