32 detached
>
> Huh. In PowerPC, is there some difference between system calls
> executed in initrd and those same system calls executed in userspace?
I've faced some issues in the past with certain syscalls not working
exactly the same on
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 09:18:00PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> If we just move the include of asm/paca.h below asm-generic/percpu.h
> then it avoids the bad circular dependency and we still have paca.h
> included from percpu.h as before.
>
> eg:
>
> diff --git
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 02:10:17PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Our mails have crossed.
Ah indeed :-)
> I just sent a more comprehensive patch. I
> think your patch would require a lot of build testing and even then may
> fail for some CONFIG combination that we didn't test or added in the
Hi again Stephen,
On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 07:20:19PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 08:48:42PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We are getting build failures in some PowerPC configs for Linus' tree.
> > See e.g. http://k
On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 08:48:42PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We are getting build failures in some PowerPC configs for Linus' tree.
> See e.g. http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/14306515/
>
> In file included from /kisskb/src/arch/powerpc/include/asm/paca.h:18,
>
kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <pau...@samba.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/misc_32.S
Hi Zhu,
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 05:11:48PM +0800, zhuyj wrote:
Hi, Claudiu
Please help to review this patch. This patch is for kernel 2.6.x. Thanks
a lot.
Hi, Willy
Please help to merge this patch to longterm: 2.6.32.61 since this
problem also occurs on this kernel. Thanks a lot.
Hi Zhu,
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 05:57:53PM +0800, zhuyj wrote:
I reference the following 2 mainline commits. These 2 commits are based
on the current kernel 3.x and ethtool.
If we only backport these 2 commits on kernel 2.6.x, this problem will
not be fixed yet.
OK fine, I just wanted that
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 06:15:25PM +0800, zhuyj wrote:
Hi, Willy
I made a new patch. In long commit message, I inserted the equivalent
mainline commit
about this feature. Maybe it is better. Now this patch is in the
attachment. Please check
and merge it into kernel 2.6.32.62.
Sure, it's
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 02:40:23PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
This patch adds GRO support to mv643xx_eth by making it invoke
napi_gro_receive instead of netif_receive_skb.
Signed-off-by: Soeren Moch sm...@web.de
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth
Hi Sebastian,
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 04:47:49PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
I did some simple tests on Dove/Cubox with 'netperf -cCD' and
gso/gro/lro options on
mv643xx_eth. The tests may not be sufficient, as I am not that into
net performance testing.
In fact the difference only
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 05:27:03PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
I don't have a strong opinion on whether Soeren's or your proposal should
be submitted. But I insist on having one of them in, as GRO significantly
improves the common use case, is enabled by default, and not as
constrained
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 08:54:35AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Thu, 2013-04-11 at 17:32 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 05:27:03PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
I don't have a strong opinion on whether Soeren's or your proposal should
be submitted. But I insist
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 06:59:11PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 05:27:03PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
I don't have a strong opinion on whether Soeren's or your proposal should
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 01:31:19PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
From: Sebastian Hesselbarth sebastian.hesselba...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:27:03 +0200
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 04:47:49PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:59:15AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Thu, 2013-04-11 at 19:51 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Eric provided me with one such experimental patch in the past for this
driver. It worked for me but we never tried to clean it up to propose
it for inclusion
Hi Joakim,
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 12:39:50PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
I figure, after 2.4.37.12, a public git tree on kernel org which still
receives fixes would be enough.
FYI, I've merged your patches and pushed them along with a few pending
other ones here :
Hi Tony,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 09:44:19AM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 07:35:28AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:52:02AM +1100, Michael Neuling wrote:
stable-2.6.27.60 added c24cb8e5 which uses PV_POWER7 but it's not
defined. Following
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:52:02AM +1100, Michael Neuling wrote:
stable-2.6.27.60 added c24cb8e5 which uses PV_POWER7 but it's not
defined. Following patch adds these definitions.
Thank you for the report Michael, I have no PPC toolchain so I have
not tested this one. Added now.
Just one
Hi Joakim,
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 09:44:18AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote on 2011/12/11 18:33:46:
Hi Joakim,
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 06:19:54PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
To: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
From: Willy Tarreau
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 12:39:50PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
BTW, since you're asking, you seem to still be using 2.4. Do you think it's
worth pursuing maintenance over 2.4.37.12 and if so for how long ? I'm
asking
because until the break-in, I felt like almost nobody was using it
2.6.27-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
commit 5db1256a5131d3b133946fa02ac9770a784e6eb2 upstream.
Move the smp_rmb after cpu_relax loop in read_seqlock and add
ACCESS_ONCE to make sure the test and return are consistent.
A
Hi Joakim,
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 06:19:54PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
To: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
From: Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu
Hi Joakim, On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 01:30:06PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund
wrote: This is a
backport from 2.6 which I did
Hi Joakim,
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 01:30:06PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
This is a backport from 2.6 which I did to overcome 8xx CPU
bugs. 8xx does not update the DAR register when taking a TLB
error caused by dcbX and icbi insns which makes it very
tricky to use these insns. Also the
Hi an,
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 09:22:09AM -0700, Dan Malek wrote:
Hi Joakim.
On Oct 10, 2011, at 4:38 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
This adds Large page support for 8xx and uses it
for all kernel RAM
- Dan, what do you think :)
Since you asked, yes it looks great :-) Now, can
Hi Joakim,
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 03:54:45PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
This is a backport from 2.6 which I did to overcome 8xx CPU
bugs. 8xx does not update the DAR register when taking a TLB
error caused by dcbX and icbi insns which makes it very
tricky to use these insns. Also the
Hi Anton,
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 08:16:00AM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
Hi,
From: Amit Shah amit.s...@redhat.com
commit e74d098c66543d0731de62eb747ccd5b636a6f4c upstream.
Alan pointed out a race in the code where hvc_remove is invoked. The
recent virtio_console work is the
to using tty_vhangup().
Reported-by: Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Signed-off-by: Amit Shah amit.s...@redhat.com
CC: Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
CC: linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org
CC: Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gre...@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau w
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 09:12:44AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote on 2011/01/11 07:09:26:
Hi Joakim,
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:37:46PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
This is a backport from 2.6 which I did to overcome 8xx CPU
bugs. 8xx does
Hi Joakim,
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:37:46PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
This is a backport from 2.6 which I did to overcome 8xx CPU
bugs. 8xx does not update the DAR register when taking a TLB
error caused by dcbX and icbi insns which makes it very
tricky to use these insns. Also the
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 08:45:38PM +0530, Sachin P. Sant wrote:
2.6.29-rc3-git5 randconfig build on powerpc fails with following error
CALLarch/powerpc/kernel/systbl_chk.sh
CALLarch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init_check.sh
CC [M] drivers/staging/panel/panel.o
Thanks Sachin !
Greg, could you please merge this one into your staging tree ?
Thanks,
Willy
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 09:10:58PM +0530, Sachin P. Sant wrote:
* Fix build break for lcd panel driver.
Signed-off-by : Sachin Sant sach...@in.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 10:28:46AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
Sometimes, for performance critical paths, I would like gcc to be dumb and
follow *my* code and not its hard-coded probabilities.
If you really want that, simple: just disable optimization @)
already tried. It fixed some
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 01:33:53PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
Note in particular the last predictors; assuming branch ending
with goto, including call, causing early function return or
returning negative constant are not taken. Just these alone
are likely 95+% of the unlikelies in the
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:42:26AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 18:33:16 +0100
Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:25:52AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:08:01 +0100
Roel Kluin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:25:52AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:08:01 +0100
Roel Kluin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The patch below was not yet tested. If it's correct as it is, please
comment. ---
Fix Unlikely(x) == y
you found a great set of bugs..
but to be
36 matches
Mail list logo
