On 20/07/2016 08:30, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> In particular this patch would indeed have a conflict, because you have
>
> +#define KVM_CAP_PPC_HTM 129
>
> but cap numbers 129 and 130 are already taken. So whoever applies it
> should bump the number to 131.
Applied now, it's 132.
Paolo
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> On 20/07/2016 07:46, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman
>>
>> Or do you want me to merge this before Paul gets back?
>
> No, this should be merged through the KVM tree. Please Cc the KVM
>
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 01:41:36PM +1000, Sam Bobroff wrote:
> Introduce a new KVM capability, KVM_CAP_PPC_HTM, that can be queried to
> determine if a PowerPC KVM guest should use HTM (Hardware Transactional
> Memory).
>
> This will be used by QEMU to populate the pa-features bits in the
>
On 20/07/2016 07:46, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman
>
> Or do you want me to merge this before Paul gets back?
No, this should be merged through the KVM tree. Please Cc the KVM
maintainers before offering to apply a patch that formally
Sam Bobroff writes:
> Introduce a new KVM capability, KVM_CAP_PPC_HTM, that can be queried to
> determine if a PowerPC KVM guest should use HTM (Hardware Transactional
Minor nit, "should" should be "can" IMHO.
> Memory).
>
> This will be used by QEMU to populate the
On 20/07/16 13:41, Sam Bobroff wrote:
> Introduce a new KVM capability, KVM_CAP_PPC_HTM, that can be queried to
> determine if a PowerPC KVM guest should use HTM (Hardware Transactional
> Memory).
>
> This will be used by QEMU to populate the pa-features bits in the
> guest's device tree.
>
>
Introduce a new KVM capability, KVM_CAP_PPC_HTM, that can be queried to
determine if a PowerPC KVM guest should use HTM (Hardware Transactional
Memory).
This will be used by QEMU to populate the pa-features bits in the
guest's device tree.
Signed-off-by: Sam Bobroff
---
Sam Bobroff writes:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 08:49:49PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> On Wed, 2016-06-07 at 06:05:54 UTC, Sam bobroff wrote:
>> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
>> > index 02416fe..06d79bc 100644
>> > ---
On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 08:49:49PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-06-07 at 06:05:54 UTC, Sam bobroff wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> > index 02416fe..06d79bc 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> > +++
On Wed, 2016-06-07 at 06:05:54 UTC, Sam bobroff wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> index 02416fe..06d79bc 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> @@ -588,6 +588,10 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 04:05:54PM +1000, Sam Bobroff wrote:
> Introduce a new KVM capability, KVM_CAP_PPC_HTM, that can be queried to
> determine if a PowerPC KVM guest should use HTM (Hardware Transactional
> Memory).
>
> This will be used by QEMU to populate the pa-features bits in the
>
On Wed, 2016-07-06 at 16:05 +1000, Sam Bobroff wrote:
> Introduce a new KVM capability, KVM_CAP_PPC_HTM, that can be queried to
> determine if a PowerPC KVM guest should use HTM (Hardware Transactional
> Memory).
>
> This will be used by QEMU to populate the pa-features bits in the
> guest's
Introduce a new KVM capability, KVM_CAP_PPC_HTM, that can be queried to
determine if a PowerPC KVM guest should use HTM (Hardware Transactional
Memory).
This will be used by QEMU to populate the pa-features bits in the
guest's device tree.
Signed-off-by: Sam Bobroff
---
13 matches
Mail list logo