On Wednesday 11 June 2008, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 18:28 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
We used to do this correctly in case of a user triggered
kexec, but not for kdump.
Used to?
Sorry, wrong wording. I meant without this patch, it's correct
for kexec.
This patch
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
On Wednesday 11 June 2008, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 18:28 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
We used to do this correctly in case of a user triggered
kexec, but not for kdump.
Used to?
Sorry, wrong wording. I meant without this
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 18:06 +1000, Michael Neuling wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
On Wednesday 11 June 2008, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 18:28 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
We used to do this correctly in case of a user triggered
kexec, but not for
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 18:28 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
The ibm,cbe-start-ptcal rtas call transfers ownership
of a memory range to the hardware in order to do
periodic memory interface recalibration.
When we do a kexec, we need to get this page back,
so we don't step on the new kernel's toes.
